Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CoreOS Clair vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security comparison

Red Hat and SentinelOne are both solutions in the Container Security category. Red Hat is ranked #26 with an average rating of 9.0, while SentinelOne is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.7. Red Hat holds a 0.5% mindshare in Container Security, compared to SentinelOne’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 99% of SentinelOne users who would recommend it.
CoreOS Clair
Read 2 CoreOS Clair reviews
  • 526 Views
  • 411 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Read 104 SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security reviews
  • 4,495 Views
  • 1,141 Comparison Views
99% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

CoreOS Clair and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security compete in the cloud security category. Users favor SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security for its features and security.

Features: CoreOS Clair provides detailed vulnerability scanning, effective container analysis, and open-source flexibility. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers comprehensive threat detection, automated response capabilities, and extensive security features for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: CoreOS Clair requires better scalability, more frequent updates, and enhanced user interface. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security needs improvements in real-time alerting mechanisms, better integration with existing security frameworks, and more customizable reporting options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CoreOS Clair is straightforward to deploy but has mixed reviews on customer support responsiveness. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is known for fast deployment and superior, proactive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: CoreOS Clair is cost-effective with a quick return on investment. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is more expensive but is considered justified by its extensive features and robust support, resulting in a strong ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CoreOS Clair vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
CoreOS Clair vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 831,881 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CoreOS Clair
Ranking in Container Security
26th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Ranking in Container Security
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
104
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (6th), Cloud and Data Center Security (5th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (4th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (4th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (3rd), Compliance Management (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of CoreOS Clair is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is 2.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Security
 

Featured Reviews

Felipe Giffu - PeerSpot reviewer
An operational system, similar to Linux where you can run your applications inside containers
With CoreOS, you can run your applications inside containers. For example, if you have an application that needs to run on Linux, you can create and install a container. However, it's important to note that you don't install CoreOS inside a container; CoreOS is the host operating system that manages containers. When you mentioned using Nacula as part of your CI/CD pipeline, it means your application is deployed and managed automatically through the CI/CD process. Containers are used to deploy your application within this pipeline, but CoreOS does not run inside these containers. Instead, CoreOS is the base operating system that supports and manages these containers.
Read full review
Andrew W - PeerSpot reviewer
Tells us about vulnerabilities as well as their impact and helps to focus on real issues
Looking at all the different pieces, it has got everything we need. Some of the pieces we do not even use. For example, we do not have Kubernetes Security. We are not running any K8 clusters, so it is good for us. Overall, we find the solution to be fantastic. There can be additional education components. This may not be truly fair to them because of what the product is going for, but it would be great to see additional education for compliance. It is not a criticism of the tool per se, but anything to help non-development resources understand some of the complexities of the cloud is always appreciated. Any additional educational resources are always helpful for security teams, especially those without a development background.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"With CoreOS, you can run your applications inside containers. For example, if you have an application that needs to run on Linux, you can create and install a container. However, it's important to note that you don't install CoreOS inside a container; CoreOS is the host operating system that manages containers."
"CoreOS Clair's best feature is detection accuracy."
"We use the infrastructure as code scanning, which is good."
"Cloud Native Security's evidence-based reporting allows us to prioritize issues by understanding their impact, helping us resolve the most important problems first."
"It is advantageous in terms of time-saving and cost reduction."
"The most valuable feature of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is its advanced AI and machine learning capabilities, which allow it to identify and respond to threats in real time."
"The multi-cloud support is valuable. They are expanding to different clouds. It is not restricted to only AWS. It allows us to have different clouds on one platform."
"The UI is responsive and user-friendly."
"The solution helped free other staff to work on other projects or other tasks. We basically just had to do a bunch of upfront configuring. With it, we do not have to spend as much time in the console."
"Singularity Cloud Security's most valuable features are its ease of scalability and comprehensive security measures."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pros
 

Cons

"It can be improved in its support response. They usually take up to seven days to resolve the issue."
"An area for improvement is that CoreOS Clair doesn't provide information about the location of vulnerabilities it detects."
"In terms of ease of use, initially, it is a bit confusing to navigate around, but once you get used to it, it becomes easier."
"They can work on policies based on different compliance standards."
"For SentinelOne, improvements could be made in managing Internet dependency as cloud-based operations can pose challenges in environments with limited connectivity."
"Implementing single sign-on requires a pre-class account feature, which is currently not available."
"Bugs need to be disclosed quickly."
"For SentinelOne, improvements could be made in managing Internet dependency as cloud-based operations can pose challenges in environments with limited connectivity."
"When we get a new finding from PingSafe, I wish we could get an alert in the console, so we can work on it before we see it in the report. It would be very useful for the team that is actively working on the PingSafe platform, so we can close the issue the same day before it appears in the daily report."
"SentinelOne currently lacks a break glass account feature, which is critical for implementing Single Sign-On."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CoreOS Clair is open-source and free of charge."
"I am not involved in the pricing, but it is cost-effective."
"The tool is cost-effective."
"SentinelOne provided competitive pricing compared to other vendors, and we are satisfied with the deal."
"The pricing is fair. It is not inexpensive, and it is also not expensive. When managing a large organization, it is going to be costly, but it meets the business needs. In terms of what is out there on the market, it is fair and comparable to what I have seen, so I do not have any complaints about the cost"
"PingSafe is cost-effective for the amount of infrastructure we have. It's reasonable for what they offer compared to our previous solution. It's at least 25 percent to 30 percent less."
"It's a fair price for what you get. We are happy with the price as it stands."
"Its pricing was a little less than other providers."
"We have an enterprise license. It is affordable. I'm not sure, but I think we pay 150,000 rupees per month."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
831,881 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
25%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Real Estate/Law Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CoreOS Clair?
If you work with CoreOS or OpenShift, you don't need to pay for CoreOS separately. When you pay for OpenShift, you get CoreOS included, so you don't need to pay for the operating system separately....
See all answers
What needs improvement with CoreOS Clair?
It can be improved in its support response. They usually take up to seven days to resolve the issue.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for CoreOS Clair?
We use the tool to manage and secure the event file system. CoreOS Clair is an operational system that is very similar to Linux and offers benefits to other Linux operating systems. One major advan...
See all answers
What do you like most about PingSafe?
The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best features.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?
SentinelOne is relatively cheap. If ten is the most expensive, I would rate it a seven.
See all answers
What needs improvement with PingSafe?
The areas with room for improvement include the cost, which is higher compared to other security platforms. The dashboard can also be laggy.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

JFrog Xray vs CoreOS Clair Logo
JFrog Xray vs CoreOS Clair
Compared 28% of the time
Snyk vs CoreOS Clair Logo
Snyk vs CoreOS Clair
Compared 16% of the time
Tenable.io Container Security vs CoreOS Clair Logo
Tenable.io Container Security vs CoreOS Clair
Compared 13% of the time
Qualys VMDR vs CoreOS Clair Logo
Qualys VMDR vs CoreOS Clair
Compared 9% of the time
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs CoreOS Clair Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs CoreOS Clair
Compared 9% of the time
More CoreOS Clair Competitors
Wiz vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Logo
Wiz vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Compared 27% of the time
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Compared 23% of the time
AWS GuardDuty vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Logo
AWS GuardDuty vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Compared 8% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Compared 7% of the time
Orca Security vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Logo
Orca Security vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Compared 6% of the time
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Container Security
January 2025
CoreOS Clair reportDownload CoreOS Clair product report
Buyer's Guide
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
January 2025
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security reportDownload SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
PingSafe
 

Overview

Clair is an open source project for the static analysis of vulnerabilities in appc and docker containers.

Vulnerability data is continuously imported from a known set of sources and correlated with the indexed contents of container images in order to produce lists of vulnerabilities that threaten a container. When vulnerability data changes upstream, the previous state and new state of the vulnerability along with the images they affect can be sent via webhook to a configured endpoint. All major components can be customized programmatically at compile-time without forking the project.

Red Hat

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security protects cloud workloads, offering advanced threat detection and automated response. It integrates seamlessly with cloud environments and secures containerized applications and virtual machines against vulnerabilities.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is renowned for its efficiency in mitigating threats in real-time. The platform integrates effortlessly with existing cloud environments, ensuring robust cloud security management with minimal manual intervention. Securing containerized applications and virtual machines, it excels in threat intelligence and endpoint protection. However, improvements are needed in performance during high workload periods, and more integrations with third-party tools and better documentation would be beneficial. Users often find the installation process complex, support response times slow, and the dashboard's navigation unintuitive.

What are the key features of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security?
  • Real-time Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats as they occur.
  • Automated Response: Automatically responds to threats to minimize impact.
  • Ease of Deployment: Simple setup process with scalable options.
  • Machine Learning Insights: AI-driven insights enhance threat prevention.
  • Seamless Integration: Integrates with cloud environments for unified security management.
What are the primary benefits or ROI to expect from SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security?
  • Enhanced Threat Mitigation: Improved security against real-time threats.
  • Reduced Manual Intervention: Automated processes save time and resources.
  • Scalability: Easily adapts to growing security requirements.
  • Centralized Management: Manage security across platforms from a single console.
  • Advanced Threat Intelligence: Provides in-depth analysis and protection.

In specific industries, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is implemented to safeguard critical data and infrastructure. Organizations in finance, healthcare, and technology depend on its real-time threat detection and automated response to protect sensitive information. Its ability to secure containerized applications and virtual machines is particularly valuable in dynamic environments where rapid scaling is necessary.

SentinelOne
 

Sample Customers

eBay, Veritas, Verizon, SalesForce
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
CoreOS Clair vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
January 2025
Free Report: CoreOS Clair vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
Find out what your peers are saying about CoreOS Clair vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
831,881 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CoreOS Clair vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.