We performed a comparison between CoreOS Clair and SUSE NeuVector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Container Security."It is pretty easy to integrate with this platform. When properly integrated, it monitors end-to-end."
"We noted immediate benefits from using the solution."
"Cloud Native Security offers a valuable tool called an offensive search engine."
"It is advantageous in terms of time-saving and cost reduction."
"PingSafe's most valuable feature is its unified console."
"The most valuable feature of PingSafe is its integration with most of our technology stack, specifically all of our cloud platforms and ticketing software."
"I like CSPM the most. It captures a lot of alerts within a short period of time. When an alert gets triggered on the cloud, it throws an alert within half an hour, which is very reasonable. It is a plus point for us."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to gain deep visibility into the workloads inside containers."
"CoreOS Clair's best feature is detection accuracy."
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"I would like additional integrations."
"There is no break-glass account feature. They should implement this as soon as possible because we can't implement SSO without a break-glass feature."
"In terms of ease of use, initially, it is a bit confusing to navigate around, but once you get used to it, it becomes easier."
"There is room for improvement in the current active licensing model for PingSafe."
"In addition to our telecom and Slack channels, it would be helpful to receive Cloud Native Security security notifications in Microsoft Teams."
"PingSafe can improve by eliminating 100 percent of the false positives."
"The integration with Oracle has room for improvement."
"PingSafe takes four to five hours to detect and highlight an issue, and that time should be reduced."
"An area for improvement is that CoreOS Clair doesn't provide information about the location of vulnerabilities it detects."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
CoreOS Clair is ranked 26th in Container Security with 1 review while SUSE NeuVector is ranked 20th in Container Security with 7 reviews. CoreOS Clair is rated 8.0, while SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CoreOS Clair writes "Excellent detection accuracy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". CoreOS Clair is most compared with JFrog Xray, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Snyk, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Aqua Cloud Security Platform, whereas SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Sysdig Falco, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and Sysdig Secure.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
