Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cornerstone MFT vs Files.com comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cornerstone MFT
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
30th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Files.com
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
18th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Cornerstone MFT is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Files.com is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Cornerstone MFT?
Share your opinion
reviewer2330397 - PeerSpot reviewer
IP whitelisting allows for specific IP addresses within an organization to be restricted, mitigating potential hazards
There is a requirement to simplify access, particularly for managing large amounts of stored data within Files.com. Instead of navigating through firewall rules, etc., users seek the ability to bypass two-factor authentication when logging in via username and password. Missing this toggle could necessitate recreating the account. Additionally, there's a lack of clarity regarding users under this system, making monitoring challenging. However, Files.com does offer SSO, which addresses many of these concerns. The solution should show more in terms of the way we navigate things like FTP or FTPS with a username/password configuration, if not through SSO. It requires the use of an API key, among other things. There are workarounds and ways to address a few of these issues.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Files.com?
The data was valuable. We needed it. The pricing is not bad for the level of service.
What needs improvement with Files.com?
There is a requirement to simplify access, particularly for managing large amounts of stored data within Files.com. Instead of navigating through firewall rules, etc., users seek the ability to byp...
What is your primary use case for Files.com?
Files.com saves large amounts of data post-TSA exit, enabling divestment from the initial company and data migration from specific mainframe teams to newer systems. This includes data updates, with...
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

US Postal Service, Bancolombia, Bank of Montreal, Ohio Department of Public Safety, Mercury Marine, Children's National Medical Center, Pearson, Standard Bank, Medbeyond, Pathways Home Health, University of Florida, Council of the European Union, Teleflora, Metlife Stadium, NHK Japan
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Fortra, Progress Software and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: April 2025.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.