Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Coro vs Huntress comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Coro
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
62nd
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
66th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Email Security (55th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (48th)
Huntress
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
9th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
9th
Average Rating
9.4
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Anti-Malware Tools (4th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Coro is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Huntress is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Nick Mrotek - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 9, 2024
Helped us to reduce the need for expensive security tools
The automatic remediation is the most valuable feature for us. It works great. If our team can't look at an issue exactly at the moment, it's just good to know that there's Huntress that can come in and be able to remediate most, if not all, issues. If there's something that needs a further look at, we can automate the alerts. It's proven to be a lot more efficient than other antiviruses we've worked with in the past. It's easy to use Huntress overall. I haven't had too many issues. I haven't really had to contact or support with anything. So far, so good. Huntress is a solution tailored specifically for the small and medium business market. It sits on top of Windows Defender, so you do not have to have either expertise or other software. It works well as a standalone client. Removal, specifically, has been very, very nice. Others have been clunky when it comes to removing files or the application itself. Huntress has the uninstall option straight from the admin portal. That's been a great great feature. We've witnessed the benefits of Huntress both immediately after we deployed it, and after some time. The ease of use was noticed immediately. But then, eventually, when it comes to either losing a client or having someone who's left having to remove it from their machine, just having the ability to uninstall very seamlessly becomes very useful. The solution is fully managed by Huntress 24/7. It's reduced our workload in terms of triaging or managing alerts. It's very much reduced the attention to detail that we've needed to have, especially since it's such a reputable company. We feel confident in having them remediate some issues so that we don't have to be looking at them all the time. Huntress helped us to reduce the need for expensive security tools or expensive security analysts. That's very important, especially with us being a smaller business. Not having to purchase larger software has been great. I don't know if our organizational security has drastically improved. However, it has done what it needs to do. We haven't lost security; we've maybe become more secure with it. That said, just having that presence of mind, knowing that we do have a very sophisticated team and product behind us, has been wonderful.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It works well for an MSP."
"The pricing model for Huntress is similar to competitors and is charged per endpoint."
"I rate the product's price a five or six on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive since it is a fairly priced product."
"The solution is cheap compared to other alternatives. It offers good value for money. For the whole solution, it's up to about five pounds per device per month. Considering what it does, I think that's very good value."
"The tool’s price is very good. You just need to pay for the standard license. However, you need to pay the additional cost for Microsoft Defender."
"The pricing is competitive, in line with Huntress's offerings, and aligns well with our business model."
"I rate the product pricing six out of ten for the Malaysian market. However, I would rate it a three out of ten for the Australian, New Zealand, or Singapore markets."
"While other options have emerged since Huntress' arrival, I believe it still offers the best value for the features and services it provides."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
814,325 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Retailer
8%
Educational Organization
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
Computer Software Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
7%
Financial Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Huntress?
It is very easy to use. It is a great solution. They are one of the better vendors that I have ever worked with since I have been in the industry.
What needs improvement with Huntress?
I had been requesting Huntress support for macOS for a while, and they recently rolled it out, making it generally available within two months. Having a regular support line would be good.
What is your primary use case for Huntress?
It integrates seamlessly with RMM, making it easy to roll out and use. Many fixes are automated, so you can approve them and let the system handle them, avoiding the need to go through individual s...
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Lenovo, Dropbox, T-Systems
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP). Updated: October 2024.
814,325 professionals have used our research since 2012.