Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cribl vs Kloudfuse comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 26, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Cribl
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
36th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (37th), Log Management (37th), Cloud Data Integration (23rd), Data Preparation Tools (6th)
Kloudfuse
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
72nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Jai Chudasama - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 6, 2024
Provides data normalization and routes the same data to different destinations but lacks documentation
We employed a hybrid strategy, setting up Cribl Cloud as the head node in their environment. For data processing, we used worker nodes within the client’s environment, which are closer to the data sources. This setup allowed us to process data locally before sending it to our destination. For cloud assets, such as SaaS applications like Salesforce, we used the cloud-hosted Cribl instance to handle that information. Meanwhile, the on-premises data was processed by the hybrid worker nodes. We encountered delays due to third-party issues, extending the timeline to six to seven months. Without these issues, it likely would have taken around three months, depending on the speed of obtaining API keys, authorizations from networking teams, and other factors. Under ideal circumstances, a three-month timeframe would be more accurate. You need to maintain the pipeline, which includes data processing, before it reaches its destination. When onboarding new data, managing and rotating API keys as needed is important. Maintaining these aspects ensures faster and more efficient deployments. If you want to reduce log ingestion or route data to multiple destinations, consider using an on-premises or cloud solution. Your choice will depend on your organization’s network constraints. For example, if critical assets on your network need to connect to the internet, your network team might have restrictions. Weigh the benefits of cloud versus on-premises options to determine what best fits your needs.
Use Kloudfuse?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product pricing is reasonable compared to other solutions."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cribl?
Compared to other enterprise solutions, Cribl tends to be more cost-effective. While other major players can be quite expensive, especially as data volumes increase over time, Cribl offers a fair p...
What needs improvement with Cribl?
Cribl has simplified many aspects of the onboarding process, but there's still room for improvement. Currently, no other tools in the market truly compete with Cribl in its niche. Splunk is trying ...
What is your primary use case for Cribl?
We were one of the first customers when Cribl launched. Around 10% to 20% of Cribl had already been implemented when I joined. My role involved expanding it to 100% of our incoming logs being proce...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: August 2024.
801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.