Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs Nastel AutoPilot comparison

Broadcom and meshIQ are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #49 with an average rating of 7.0, while meshIQ is ranked #93. Broadcom holds a 0.0% mindshare in APM, compared to meshIQ’s 0.0% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of meshIQ users who would recommend it.
Nastel AutoPilot
Read 4 Nastel AutoPilot reviews
  • 142 Views
  • 69 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Nastel AutoPilot and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management are two competing products in the application performance monitoring space. Users are generally more satisfied with the overall features and functionality of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management, despite pricing advantages associated with Nastel AutoPilot.

What features are offered by Nastel AutoPilot in comparison to Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

Nastel AutoPilot is known for its real-time monitoring, automated corrective actions, and advanced analytics. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management provides comprehensive analytics, scalability, and a broad set of features suited for larger enterprises.

What areas of improvement can be found in Nastel AutoPilot in comparison to Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

Nastel AutoPilot users mention the product's complexity, steep learning curve, and challenging setup process. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management users note occasional latency issues, need for more intuitive navigation, and slower customer support response times.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Nastel AutoPilot in comparison to Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

Nastel AutoPilot faces feedback on its challenging deployment process but receives positive reviews for its responsive customer service. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is praised for smoother deployment but has mixed reviews regarding the consistency of its customer service response times.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Nastel AutoPilot in comparison to Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

Nastel AutoPilot is seen as cost-effective with strong ROI, although setup costs are a concern for some users. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management has higher initial costs but is perceived as delivering better long-term ROI due to its advanced features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Nastel AutoPilot Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Nastel AutoPilot
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,476 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
49th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nastel AutoPilot
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
93rd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nastel AutoPilot is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shahpoup - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly
My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.
Read full review
it_user226614 - PeerSpot reviewer
You can easily scale it for high message rates, but it's primarily a flow-monitoring tool rather than an APM.
Autopilot is a middleware-centric business transaction monitoring tool that includes a Complex Event Processor (CEP) for transaction data. Architecture AutoPilot Probes are lightweight performance measurement and monitoring tools for live applications that are executed at defined points within the…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,476 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has suc...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2025
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reportDownload Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2025
Nastel AutoPilot reportDownload Nastel AutoPilot product report
 

Also Known As

CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
No data available
 

Overview

CA Cross-Enterprise APM provides 24/7 monitoring of business transactions for complex application environments by monitoring the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems and providing CA Application Performance Management with this data on a single pane of glass.

Broadcom
Nastel AutoPilot is an Application Performance Monitoring solution. It's real-time monitoring and analysis reduces the frequency and duration of incidents, end-to-end from distributed to mainframe.
meshIQ
 

Sample Customers

NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards
Banamex, Barclays Capital, Bank of Bermuda, California Commerce Bank, Calyon Corporate and Investment Bank, CGEY, Checkfree Corporation, CIBC, CitiCard, Citicorp, New York, Citigroup Inc., CME Group Inc., Credit Agricole Indosuez Luxembourg, Credit Suisse, CRIF, Deutsche Bundesbank, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, DTCC, FannieMae, Fidelity (FMR), First Citizens Bank & Trust, Fortis Investments, GE Money Americas, GE Money Bank, HP, HP/WestLB Systems, HSBC, HSH Nordbank, IG Index, i-bp Banque, Populaire, Interpay Nederland B.V., IZB - Informatikzentrum Bayern GmbH & Co., JP Morgan, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., MGIC (Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation) NYSE, OMGEO, People's Bank (Ct), Peoples United Bank, Phoenix Informatica Bancaria S.p.A., PinkRoccade, Santander Bank, SKOFIN, Sociale Verzekeringsbank, Thomson Financial, UBS, UMB Financial Corporation
Buyer's Guide
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Nastel AutoPilot
April 2025
Free Report: Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Nastel AutoPilot
Find out what your peers are saying about Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Nastel AutoPilot and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,476 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Nastel AutoPilot report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.