Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring comparison

Broadcom and ATAKAMA Technologies are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #49 with an average rating of 7.0, while ATAKAMA Technologies is ranked #84. Broadcom holds a 0.0% mindshare in APM, compared to ATAKAMA Technologies’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ATAKAMA Technologies users who would recommend it.
POWERHOUSE Application Perf...
Read 4 POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring reviews
  • 158 Views
  • 90 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring and Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management are popular tools in the tech market. Despite users preferring the pricing and support of POWERHOUSE, Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management seems superior due to its features, making users feel it is worth the price.

Features: POWERHOUSE offers simplified dashboard views, real-time monitoring, and user-friendly interfaces. Cross-Enterprise provides in-depth analytical tools, broader integration capabilities, and advanced reporting features.

Room for Improvement: POWERHOUSE could benefit from enhanced customization options, better integration features, and improved scalability. Cross-Enterprise needs to improve intuitiveness, reduce initial setup complexity, and offer more thorough user guides.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: POWERHOUSE offers a quicker deployment process and strong customer service support. Cross-Enterprise has a more detailed deployment process and slightly lower-rated customer service.

Pricing and ROI: POWERHOUSE users report lower setup costs and faster return on investment. Cross-Enterprise, though having higher upfront costs, is believed to justify the investment over time with its extensive features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
49th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
POWERHOUSE Application Perf...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
84th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shahpoup - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly
My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.
Read full review
it_user328959 - PeerSpot reviewer
Gives us clear information on what is going wrong and where we need to focus to improve our applications, but it lacks automatic alerting.
Have real-time performance metrics Alerting Profiling in production Gives us clear information on what is going wrong and where we need to focus to improve our applications. Real added value in our IT internal and external organization (we open Nudge APM dashboard to our outsourced…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has suc...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?
At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2025
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reportDownload Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2025
POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring reportDownload POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring product report
 

Also Known As

CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management
Nudge APM
 

Overview

CA Cross-Enterprise APM provides 24/7 monitoring of business transactions for complex application environments by monitoring the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems and providing CA Application Performance Management with this data on a single pane of glass.

Broadcom

The APM solution fully integrated with Real End User Monitoring and Synthetic Monitoring.

Be able to monitor and diagnose quickly any application performance slowdown with a fully integrated APM and User Monitoring solution. Start from the End User eyes and application response time monitoring down to code analysis and diagnostic. It has never been so easy to discover the root cause of any slow response time.

With few clics you can drill down and fix a problem to avoid any end user dissatisfaction or complain. APM is now integrated with End User Monitoring for a full understanding of what is happening. You can now monitor End User Satisfaction in production.

ATAKAMA Technologies
 

Sample Customers

NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards
Bank and Insurance : Crédit Agricole, CDC (Caisse des dépots et consignations), ACMS (French healthcare insurance), Service : Unibail Rodamco, Elis, Public : CNIL, Mairie de Paris, AESN, HAS, EPIDE, Ministere Education Nationale Software : Jalma, Neoxia, AFI, Traceone, Infinancials, Telecom operator : NordNet Media : Les Echos,
Buyer's Guide
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring
April 2025
Free Report: Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring
Find out what your peers are saying about Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.