Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cyware Cyber Fusion vs ThreatQ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cyware Cyber Fusion
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
28th
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
25th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ThreatQ
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
17th
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
24th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

AhmedKonsowa - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 8, 2023
A stable solution with excellent features and a helpful technical support team
We use the solution for cyber fusion centers The product has a lot of strong points compared to other tools. The prices must be reduced. I have been using the solution for one year. I am using the latest version of the solution. I rate the tool’s stability a nine out of ten. In my company,…
JR
Mar 28, 2024
Improves the threat intelligence gathering process, but it is not user-friendly
We used the solution for threat mapping and managing IoCs ThreatQ is a very good tool. We can create playbooks. The solution’s data aggregation and correlation capabilities are good. The product has connectors for the majority of the security controls. Integrating the solution with our existing…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The technical support team is helpful."
"The product is stable."
"Integrating the solution with our existing security tools and workflows was easy."
"The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized as malicious."
 

Cons

"The tool doesn't integrate well with ServiceNow."
"The prices must be reduced."
"The solution should be simpler for the end-user in terms of reporting and navigating the product."
"The tool is not user-friendly."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
806,727 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
12%
Educational Organization
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ThreatQ?
Integrating the solution with our existing security tools and workflows was easy.
What needs improvement with ThreatQ?
The tool is not user-friendly. It is not beginner-friendly. It would be very difficult for a beginner to learn the tool. It will take at least two months to get familiar with it. Building the playb...
What is your primary use case for ThreatQ?
We used the solution for threat mapping and managing IoCs.
 

Also Known As

CSOL, Fusion and Threat Response, Threat Intelligence eXchange, Security Orchestration and Automation (SOAR)
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Radar, Bitdefender, Crowdstrike, FireEye, IBM Security
Find out what your peers are saying about Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. ThreatQ and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
806,727 professionals have used our research since 2012.