DataSunrise Database Security vs Oracle Audit Vault comparison

"We have a law in Turkey similar to the GDPR in the European Union. It's almost like a replica. Complying with this law is crucial, and the service plays a significant role. Many customer inquiries revolve around not retaining their data. The service addresses this by providing functionality for masking data within the databases. So, if a user requests data deletion, we can remove any information we have on them within the database, ensuring compliance with the law."

"The most valuable feature of DataSunrise Database Security is Dynamic Masking. You don't need to build copies of the database and is highly customizable. It is a very good unique feature. It also has built-in algorithms, or machine learning, which is quite helpful, because it understands the user's behaviors and patterns to apply certain policies."

"Our client was scheduled to take a year and a half to set up compliance, but by deploying this product they were able to do the compliance reports within three months."

"Technical support is perfect."

"This solution acts as a complete data warehouse for our audit data."

"Out-of-the-box policies ensure our compliance with standards like SOX, ISO 27001, and so on."

"All of the other components that make up the infrastructure in the environment including the operating system are also quite valuable."

"The solution is very stable and reliable."

"It has reduced the stress of collecting database event logs in silos from each database."

"Our clients can see all of their past actions or the wrong activity done on the network. We can load the diagnostics for the business."

"The solution has many features but I would like to see vulnerability assessments in the next release."

"I believe there's room for improvement in their distributor network, especially in Turkey. This is why I was exploring alternatives to DataSunrise Database Security. However, the product itself is quite good. One suggestion for enhancement could be adding an encryption module on top of the masking features, perhaps a more permanent form of preservative encryption."

"Currently, you need two servers: one for Audit Vault and one for the firewall. If they can combine them into one server, it will be great because it is costly to have two servers. It will also make its installation easier. I have heard that in the new version, there will be only one server for both."

"The performance of Oracle Audit Vault could be improved, especially in handling large data collections and generating reports on time."

"Stability could be improved, we have had some challenges"

"I hear from many people that say IBM Guardian is better than Oracle Audit Vault when it comes to performance. IBM Guardian works transparently in the database, but Oracle Audit Vault consumes some ratios on the server."

"The support could improve."

"An easy, friendly user interface would be nice to have, since this would enable administrators to identify important events with a prompt response."

"This solution doesn't audit the network."

"One feature that is missing is the ability to have a secret server that is always encrypted."

"The product is expensive."

"For the bank, the license was $48,000 last time. That was the licensing for the bank on just one license."

"This solution is definitely not expensive, and it is a small fraction of the overall database licensing costs."

"The licensing cost is about $360,000, annually."

"Oracle can be an expensive solution depending on the options and user needs."