Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Eclipse Luna vs dbForge Studio for SQL Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

dbForge Studio for SQL Server
Ranking in IDE
12th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Eclipse Luna
Ranking in IDE
15th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IDE category, the mindshare of dbForge Studio for SQL Server is 1.3%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Eclipse Luna is 0.7%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IDE
 

Featured Reviews

Lucas Dreyer - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable, scalable solution with excellent administration
The initial setup is straightforward. It's quite easy to create databases, administrate databases, and set up a backup. It's quite easy to install and to manage. Deployment can take up to three hours if you are installing the full SQL server. Setting up just the database is a couple of minutes. I haven't set up a full backup, or any of that myself. I've set up backups to local disks, however, and that's quite easy to do. Setting up jobs, or maintenance jobs that are running statistics on variables, shrinking, translating locked files, etc., only take a few minutes to set up. A full configuration would take two hours maximum.
RahulJain7 - PeerSpot reviewer
Good plugins and helpful templates with a useful auto-code suggestion feature
Eclipse's auto-code suggestion feature makes programming very easy and fast. Thanks to Eclipse, we can deliver fast and well-compiled code as it compiles the code on every hit which stops developers from writing bad code instantly. On top of this, we can integrate other software like Tomcat, and MySQL in Eclipse very easily which makes development even faster. Now, we can deploy our Java app directly into Tomcat from Eclipse itself which saves a lot of time in development. The same thing is true in MySQL. we can see data in Eclipse itself using SQL queries. There's no need to install a query browser application.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I like the ease of use and quick data usage."
"It's quite easy to install and use from a local machine or laptop, as well as on a server."
"It is very extensible and uses resources optimally."
"Eclipse's auto-code suggestion feature makes programming very easy and fast."
"It works like a one-stop shop for all of our application development requirements."
 

Cons

"The only issue that I have is that it depends on hardware resources, it takes a lot, that is the only set back with the solution."
"The lock files and login are two features we've had issues with. As far as I can see, there's no way to switch off the login in SQL Servers. If there could be a way to switch off the login, for transactions, or in operations, or tables, that'd be great."
"I would like to see it extend native support for functional languages like Scala."
"The development of the product needs improvement."
"Eclipse can sometimes be a plugin nightmare. Various plugins require different versions of the same plugin running for different reasons."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Because it's 2012 version, it's a one-off enterprise license that we have never had to upgrade."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IDE solutions are best for your needs.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Boeing, Sony, Honda, Oracle, BMW, Samsung
NASA
Find out what your peers are saying about Eclipse Luna vs. dbForge Studio for SQL Server and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.