Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Device42 vs FNT Command Platform comparison

 

Categories and Ranking

Device42
Ranking in Data Center Infrastructure Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
IT Asset Management (6th), Configuration Management Databases (2nd), IP Address Management (IPAM) Tools (3rd)
FNT Command Platform
Ranking in Data Center Infrastructure Management
7th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Data Center Infrastructure Management category, the mindshare of Device42 is 5.8%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FNT Command Platform is 1.8%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Center Infrastructure Management
 

Featured Reviews

Krishna Gopal Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Good reporting and discovery capabilities, and helpful for understanding device dependencies and asset management
Its price needs to be improved. It is more expensive than some of the other tools out there. Their support is good, but their knowledge base should be better. There should be a common area where we can search and find solutions for our queries or issues. We don't always need to raise a ticket with the Device42 support team. Currently, if you want to ping devices, you need to log into Appliance Manager. This feature should be available on the Device42 side. You should be able to use the ping utility without logging into Appliance Manager. The features that are there in Appliance Manager should also be available on the main Device42 server so that you have more control on one screen. You don't need to switch to another portal, but it is not something critical.
Use FNT Command Platform?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Center Infrastructure Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Healthcare Company
9%
University
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Device42?
Based on the use case for Device42, I found the solution a bit expensive. However, when you look at the support and the industry standards, Device42 was on par with the industry. Device42 is a litt...
What needs improvement with Device42?
The product must provide AI features. It would be very useful if I could create datasets or queries from an AI interface.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Computershare, Concur, Doosan, Fitch Ratings Inc., Fujitsu, HomeAway, Jasper Wireless, Mercedes-Benz, Square, Twitch, UCSB, Zayo Group Inc.
Alcatel Lucent, AMT Group, Bellintegrator, CROC Inc., Datentechnik Moll GmbH, FiberOpto, Heldele GmbH, iXperta s.r.o., Kapsch BusinessCom, NC Systems, R_waplan AG, Stele Infotech, Unitel Engineering