Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Diamanti vs Portworx Enterprise comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Diamanti
Ranking in Data Storage for Kubernetes
5th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Container Management (19th)
Portworx Enterprise
Ranking in Data Storage for Kubernetes
1st
Average Rating
9.2
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Software Defined Storage (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Data Storage for Kubernetes category, the mindshare of Diamanti is 3.9%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Portworx Enterprise is 43.0%, up from 37.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Storage for Kubernetes
 

Featured Reviews

Use Diamanti?
Share your opinion
Paulo Jose  Bosco Otto - PeerSpot reviewer
May 30, 2023
A solution backed by strong customer support, that is stable and scalable
As a company managed in a Kubernetes environment, being trusted by a Kubernetes vendor, Red Hat creates barriers against using other certified solutions that work. Because IBM is a competitor of Pure Storage, things seem to be getting worse. I don't have plans to use Portworx Enterprise in the future because, at the moment, I am working with Ondat, and I have to follow NetApp's direction on that. When evaluating Portworx, one should make sure their company has already chosen Pure Storage. Still, if they are evaluating the solution on Ondat or Dell or other platforms, they should get a roadmap statement from Pure Storage, that they will continue to develop storage hardware diagnostics. I rate Portworx a nine out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The price of Portworx Enterprise is high."
"I'm not sure how the licensing was broken out, but I don't think our offering of the Portworx was more than USD $20,000."
"It has two offerings. One is free, which is limited to only five nodes. The other is enterprise, which is a bit pricier."
"The price is competitive, but it is too expensive when paired with Red Hat IBM."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Storage for Kubernetes solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
25%
Educational Organization
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Transportation Company
8%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Portworx Enterprise?
A custom IBM script is designed to tackle the storage management challenges within containerized environments, providing crucial data services and features required for enterprise applications.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portworx Enterprise?
The price is competitive, but it is too expensive when paired with Red Hat IBM.
What needs improvement with Portworx Enterprise?
It would be highly advantageous to include an integrated backup solution within the same license, rather than purchasing backup separately. It would ensure a comprehensive and streamlined approach ...
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Kubernetes, Mesosphere, NBC Universal, Red Hat
NIO, GE Digital, DreamWorks Animation, Lufthansa, beco, NEW CONTEXT