Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs Inflectra Rapise comparison

Digital.ai and Inflectra are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Digital.ai is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while Inflectra is ranked #23 with an average rating of 4.0. Digital.ai holds a 0.3% mindshare in TAt, compared to Inflectra’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Digital.ai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Inflectra users who would recommend it.

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Read 3 Digital.ai Continuous Testing reviews

290 Views
202 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

163 Views
79 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Inflectra Rapise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Inflectra Rapise and Digital.ai Continuous Testing compete in the software testing efficiency category. Inflectra Rapise is more competitive in pricing and support, while Digital.ai Continuous Testing has an advantage due to its robust features.

Features: Inflectra Rapise offers flexibility with support for web, mobile, and desktop applications. It provides extensive support for diverse technologies which enhances its utility. Digital.ai Continuous Testing stands out with advanced automation capabilities and seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines. Its comprehensive feature set is suited for sophisticated testing frameworks required in fast-paced development environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital.ai Continuous Testing provides a seamless deployment process with cloud-based accessibility fostering collaboration and scalability. Inflectra Rapise features an easy installation and configuration process that reduces deployment time. In terms of customer service, Inflectra is known for its responsive support team ensuring efficient query resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Inflectra Rapise has an attractive pricing structure with lower setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. It offers a high ROI with versatile testing capabilities. Digital.ai Continuous Testing requires a higher initial investment, but it yields substantial ROI with its comprehensive test automation solutions, beneficial for organizations focusing on maximizing testing efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Inflectra Rapise Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Inflectra Rapise

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

20th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (9th), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (2nd)

Inflectra Rapise

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

23rd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (30th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Digital.ai Continuous Testing is 0.3%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Alan Chiou

PM at Galaxy Software Services

Has Mobile Studio feature which can generate scripts

The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version.

Read full review

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most useful feature for me is Mobile Studio. It has a UI where I can click on elements, and it generates a script for me. Mobile Studio can generate code from testing steps. I'm using Python with it."

"Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing. They also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."

"The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

Cons

"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."

"The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version."

"I would also like to see more videos and descriptions that could make installation more efficient."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker."

"We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support."

"It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number of users who require access to execute the tests."

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

23%

Insurance Company

Government

Computer Software Company

32%

Government

18%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

I'm using Digital.ai Continuous Testing to create and test a mobile application. We're developing and testing a mobile app.

See all answers

What do you like most about Inflectra Rapise?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Inflectra Rapise?

I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Inflectra Rapise?

See all answers

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 47% of the time

Perfecto vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 32% of the time

LambdaTest vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 21% of the time

More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ConformIQ Creator vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing

March 2025

Download Digital.ai Continuous Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

April 2025

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Also Known As

Experitest Seetest, Experitest

Rapise

Overview

Experitest's continuous testing solutions enable enterprises to reduce risk and provide their customers satisfying, error-free experiences across all devices and browsers. They seamlessly integrate with best-in-class tools throughout the DevOps pipeline allowing organizations to rapidly deliver highly protected, quality applications at-speed and at-scale.

Digital.ai

Rapise is the most powerful and easy to use test automation tool on the market. It allows you to quickly and easily automate the testing of your web, mobile and desktop applications. Why spend hours manually regression testing your applications when you can have Rapise do it for you?

Inflectra

Sample Customers

Samsung, American Express, Barclays, China Mobile, Citi, Cisco, McAfee

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Inflectra Rapise

March 2025

Free Report: Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Inflectra Rapise

Find out what your peers are saying about Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Inflectra Rapise and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Inflectra Rapise report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.