Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Digital Safe vs OpenText InfoArchive comparison

Smarsh and OpenText are both solutions in the File Archiving category. Smarsh is ranked #11, while OpenText is ranked #5. Smarsh holds a 1.2% mindshare in FA, compared to OpenText’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Smarsh users are willing to recommend the solution.
Digital Safe
Read 1 Digital Safe review
  • 111 Views
  • 38 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
OpenText InfoArchive
Read 1 OpenText InfoArchive review
  • 506 Views
  • 170 Comparison Views
0% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Digital Safe and OpenText InfoArchive based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed File Archiving Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
File Archiving
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,600 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Digital Safe
Ranking in File Archiving
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText InfoArchive
Ranking in File Archiving
5th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the File Archiving category, the mindshare of Digital Safe is 1.2%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText InfoArchive is 4.2%, down from 10.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
File Archiving
 

Featured Reviews

it_user948 - PeerSpot reviewer
Solid product, functionally rich, but complex.
The message archiving tool is very powerful and can handle many search / flagging scenarios, as well as numerous message types (SMS, E-mail, bloomberg, etc). With flexibility comes complexity. The solution is very complex and requires significant configuration. If hosting…
Read full review
reviewer1973199 - PeerSpot reviewer
A solution that helps us sunset applications and manages data
It scales very well. We haven't completed any massive implementations, but we've never run into any scalability issues with the implementations we have. The number of users varies drastically and depends on what data is archived. For example, the users will be HR if HR data is archived. Or, if you're archiving financial system data or line of business applications, the users will be different. It's not licensed per user but on the amount of content in the system. So you can have as many users as you want. Maintenance only requires a fraction of the resources. It generally doesn't take up full-time resources to manage and administer. It's low-key once the system is in place and set up.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File Archiving solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
849,600 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Retailer
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
IBM Integrated Archive Platform vs OpenText InfoArchive Logo
IBM Integrated Archive Platform vs OpenText InfoArchive
Compared 100% of the time
More OpenText InfoArchive Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
File Archiving
April 2025
Digital Safe reportDownload Digital Safe product report
Buyer's Guide
File Archiving
April 2025
OpenText InfoArchive reportDownload OpenText InfoArchive product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Digital Safe, Autonomy Zantaz, HPE Autonomy Zantaz, HPE Digital Safe
No data available
 

Overview

Autonomy Zantaz is a highly scalable and flexible archiving platform that enables your organization to capture and preserve email messages, attachments, and files in a way that both optimizes storage and allows immediate access for discovery and review by courts, regulators, administrators, and end-users. Powered by IDOL, EAS automates the processing of enormous volumes of information, dynamically exposing the patterns, linkages and meaning within.
Smarsh

OpenText InfoArchive is a modern archive solution and cloud-based service for compliant archiving of both structured and unstructured information highly-accessible, scalable and economical.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

EDF, Morgan Stanley, RateCity, Missouri State Courts
BMO Harris Bank, Pacific Life Insurance Company, China CITIC Bank International Limited, Techint Group, Agility, Lahey Health
Buyer's Guide
File Archiving
April 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,600 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best File Archiving vendors.

We monitor all File Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.