Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Digital Safe vs ZL Unified Archive comparison

Smarsh and ZL Technologies are both solutions in the File Archiving category. Smarsh is ranked #10, while ZL Technologies is ranked #14. Smarsh holds a 2.3% mindshare in FA, compared to ZL Technologies’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Smarsh users are willing to recommend the solution.
Digital Safe
Read 1 Digital Safe review
  • 101 Views
  • 45 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
ZL Unified Archive
  • 48 Views
  • 28 Comparison Views
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Digital Safe and ZL Unified Archive based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed File Archiving Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
File Archiving
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,562 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Digital Safe
Ranking in File Archiving
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ZL Unified Archive
Ranking in File Archiving
14th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the File Archiving category, the mindshare of Digital Safe is 2.3%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ZL Unified Archive is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
File Archiving
 

Featured Reviews

it_user948 - PeerSpot reviewer
Solid product, functionally rich, but complex.
The message archiving tool is very powerful and can handle many search / flagging scenarios, as well as numerous message types (SMS, E-mail, bloomberg, etc). With flexibility comes complexity. The solution is very complex and requires significant configuration. If hosting…
Read full review
Use ZL Unified Archive?
Share your opinion
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File Archiving solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,562 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
File Archiving
November 2024
Digital Safe reportDownload Digital Safe product report
Buyer's Guide
File Archiving
November 2024
ZL Unified Archive reportDownload ZL Unified Archive product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Digital Safe, Autonomy Zantaz, HPE Autonomy Zantaz, HPE Digital Safe
No data available
 

Learn More

Smarsh
Video not available
ZL Technologies
 

Overview

Autonomy Zantaz is a highly scalable and flexible archiving platform that enables your organization to capture and preserve email messages, attachments, and files in a way that both optimizes storage and allows immediate access for discovery and review by courts, regulators, administrators, and end-users. Powered by IDOL, EAS automates the processing of enormous volumes of information, dynamically exposing the patterns, linkages and meaning within.
Detailed litigation support for every part of the Electronic Discovery Reference Model in proactive and reactive e-discovery.
 

Sample Customers

EDF, Morgan Stanley, RateCity, Missouri State Courts
Raymond James Morgan Keegan
Buyer's Guide
File Archiving
November 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving. Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,562 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best File Archiving vendors.

We monitor all File Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.