Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DocuShare vs DocuSign CLM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

DocuShare
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Content Management (16th)
DocuSign CLM
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Contract Management Software (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

DocuShare and DocuSign CLM aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. DocuShare is designed for Enterprise Content Management and holds a mindshare of 0.6%, down 0.8% compared to last year.
DocuSign CLM, on the other hand, focuses on Contract Management Software, holds 10.3% mindshare, down 12.5% since last year.
Enterprise Content Management
Contract Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

RW
Jun 7, 2024
The new releases incorporate significant advancements in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and language processing capabilities
Version control interface is very good. The new releases of DocuShare incorporate significant advancements in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and language processing capabilities. For instance, when you upload a document into DocuShare, you no longer need to set up templates to identify and extract important fields. The system automatically reads the document and identifies key information. For example, in a contract document between two entities, it can recognize the contract start date, end date, reference number, and other relevant details without manual intervention. This automated process streamlines document management. You should know your requirements and understand your environment, as well as the goals you want to achieve. Try out the demo first to see if it fits your needs and objectives before making a decision. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
JW
Jul 15, 2018
Our contracts are moving from draft to full authorization significantly faster now
We needed to create a central repository for contracts. We needed a way to drive consistency into how contracts were drafted (formal templates). We needed to accelerate the end-to-end process Our contracts are moving through the process, from draft to full authorization, 340 percent faster than…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with DocuShare?
The user interface could be improved.
What is your primary use case for DocuShare?
We use the solution for electronic document filing.
What advice do you have for others considering DocuShare?
Version control interface is very good. The new releases of DocuShare incorporate significant advancements in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and language processing capabilities. For in...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Lincoln Public Schools, West Orange School District, Tulane University, Niagara Catholic School District, Arig, Co-operative Financial Services, Mizuho Capital Markets Corporation, Volksbank Romania and Iron Mountain, Hammersmith Hospital, Holman Insurance Brokers Ltd., Kaiser Permanente, Convergys Inc., Honeywell, Universal Pictures, McGraw Hill Construction Information Group
Valvoline, Uber, Spotify, Popsugar, Facebook, NCR, USDA, US Department of Energy, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, IBM and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.