Drata vs Vanta comparison

Drata and Vanta are both solutions in the Compliance Management category. Drata is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5, while Vanta is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. Drata holds a 8.0% mindshare in CM, compared to Vanta’s 13.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Drata users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Vanta users who would recommend it.

Drata

Read 8 Drata reviews

2,394 Views
2,100 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Vanta

Read 6 Vanta reviews

3,018 Views
2,681 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Drata

Vanta

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

Vanta and Drata are competing products in the field of security compliance automation. Vanta seems to have the upper hand in pricing and support, while Drata is preferred for its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Vanta offers flexible compliance management, automated workflows, and real-time monitoring. It supports powerful integrations with various tools and provides efficient continuous compliance monitoring. Drata provides extensive audit support, a comprehensive compliance dashboard, and streamlined automation for thorough compliance checks. It excels in organizational efficiency during audits and automates control management with integrations across multiple platforms.

Room for Improvement: Vanta could enhance its feature set to match enterprise needs better, improve more complex workflows, and offer more detailed audit support. More integrations with enterprise security systems could also be beneficial. Drata's complexity might deter smaller businesses, and its higher expense could make it less accessible. Improving ease of use for smaller organizations and reducing costs for basic versions can be considered. There are areas where automation could be simplified to reduce dependence on security experts.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Vanta provides a simple deployment model with robust customer support suitable for small to medium-sized businesses. It offers straightforward use and quick setup. Drata caters to enterprises with a more complex deployment process but offers in-depth customer service to assist with the complexities of its setup.

Pricing and ROI: Vanta offers competitive pricing and emphasizes a quick ROI, making it appealing to cost-sensitive enterprises. Drata, though priced higher, offers a substantial ROI due to its extensive feature set, suitable for businesses needing comprehensive compliance solutions. This reflects Drata's broader capabilities designed to meet enterprise-level security needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Drata vs. Vanta Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Drata vs. Vanta

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 841,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Drata

Ranking in Compliance Management

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Vanta

Ranking in Compliance Management

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Compliance Consulting (1st), Data Governance (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Compliance Management category, the mindshare of Drata is 8.0%, down from 18.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Vanta is 13.0%, down from 21.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Compliance Management

Featured Reviews

Johnny Chen

SecOps Engineer III at FINIX PAYMENTS, INC

Collects and stores compliance evidence and documentation for you using native integrations with your tech stack.

There is room for improvement in Drata. The core features are solid, but some new features are in a very MVP (Minimum Viable Product) stage. They work, but the user experience isn't always smooth. While the core features are well-developed compared to the market, the new features need more polish. They could benefit from more user feedback and iterations to make them more useful. Some of these new features look promising buthave flaws, so we can’t fully adopt them or justify paying extra for them now. The user interface is clean and intuitive. However, you'll need some specific knowledge if you're a security policy manager or need to set updifferent integrations.

Read full review

Anupam Dutta

Team Lead- Sr. Linux administrator-Kubernetes-DevOps at ExpressRCM

Helps us maintain compliance with standards like SOC 2 and various data policies, but the customer support needs improvement

It helps us track the compliance of the components listed in our partner's directory. We can also check if the password manager, XML, and three log policies have been properly implemented on the desktop. We use JEM Cloud, which is a SaaS solution, and sometimes it experiences access issues. With Vanta, we can work on resolving these issues and ensuring policy compliance. Vanta also helps us maintain compliance with standards like SOC 2 and various data policies, which are essential for our documentation and communication requirements, ultimately ensuring enterprise software policy compliance. In my role, which primarily involves IT responsibilities, I often deal with various policies. There are instances where specific policies, especially those related to quality, may not be implemented correctly. This primarily occurs with mainframes and devices owned by particular users. In such cases, Vanta helps us enable these policies on the devices and assign them to the relevant users. It also highlights when certain policies, such as version 86.x, are not assigned through SAP. Vanta provides guidance on configuring and mitigating these issues. Additionally, it helps us with GitHub account provisioning and deprovisioning, as well as managing GitHub and Google Workspace Flex. We also use the 1Password password manager, which Vanta assists in overseeing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Drata offers APIs for every clause so that it can integrate into various platforms."

"Drata helps eliminate evidence gathering and makes assigning different activities to different team members easier, simplifying compliance and audit processes. In Pennsylvania, we're putting in thousands of hours. Drata improves our security posture by reducing extra work, allowing us to focus on other security directives. I like the control editing and task management features the most. It's easy to use, but it's also easy for people to think they don't need security experts if they have it."

"Drata keeps adding new features, allowing us to build our entire InfoSec program within it. Adding new components and evidence for different audits is easy. Drata also integrates with various software, like ticketing systems, source code control, and cloud platforms, continuously pulling evidence from these integrations. Without a GRC tool with these integrations, we used to gather evidence from different software during audits manually. Drata has a significant impact on our security posture management. Previously, Drata had features for security posture management, primarily through integration with AWS. For example, it would scan AWS for specific security requirements, like ensuring all S3 buckets are private. It will be reported on the Drata platform if it finds a public bucket. Recently, Drata introduced a new feature that uses an infrastructure-as-code approach. This feature detects issues and provides AI-generated suggestions for fixing them. If an organization uses infrastructure-as-code solutions like Terraform, Drata will suggest changes to the Terraform code to address the issues. You can then review and apply these changes to fix the problems. This is particularly useful when dealing with many topics, as it helps automate and speed up the process of implementing fixes. However, this AI-generated code feature is part of Drata’s upsell options. The basic version of Drata offers limited capabilities compared to the advanced features available with a paid upgrade. Even without this new feature, Drata's security posture management is valuable, as it scans cloud environments for deviations from defined security baselines. Many tools offer similar capabilities, but Drata’s new feature that translates issues into actionable fixes is a notable advancement. This benefits teams with the capability and resources to use this tool effectively."

"Drata helped us publish our ISO and SOC reports, which was essential for the acquisition. The challenge now is whether Drata can scale up to meet the needs of a larger company, which already has tools like Intune to enforce laptop encryption. Drata is excellent for startups and small—to medium-sized companies but may face challenges in larger organizations with multiple environments."

"The product is 100 percent friendly to use."

"The way the tool's controls are linked to the framework, specifically with SAST and HIPAA frameworks or any other frameworks, is really good."

"They integrate into New Relic as a performance monitoring tool."

"The most valuable feature of Vanta is its prebuilt control frameworks."

"The most valuable feature of Vanta would be the time savings from the automation and the continuous compliance monitoring once set up."

"Task management and vendor assurance are the most valuable features. It is also an easy tool to use."

"It helps us track the compliance of the components listed in our partner's directory. We can also check if the password manager, XML, and three log policies have been properly implemented on the desktop."

"The product has provided automated security controls for our cloud provider. It helps to automate security checks. Vanta offers a list of things that can be done to achieve ISO 27001 compliance."

Cons

"The solution is quite costly."

"One of the challenges with Drata is that if you're paying for a subscription to ISO 27001, you must undergo a risk assessment. You should have access to all necessary modules on the platform to achieve your compliance posture and certification."

"The product can improve in its API documentation area."

"The existing features of Drata are already extensive and costly to integrate."

"There is room for improvement in Drata. The core features are solid, but some new features are in a very MVP (Minimum Viable Product) stage. They work, but the user experience isn't always smooth. While the core features are well-developed compared to the market, the new features need more polish. They could benefit from more user feedback and iterations to make them more useful. Some of these new features look promising buthave flaws, so we can’t fully adopt them or justify paying extra for them now. The user interface is clean and intuitive. However, you'll need some specific knowledge if you're a security policy manager or need to set updifferent integrations."

"The thing with Drata is you cannot open multiple tabs on the same interface or the same desktop,"

"In terms of improvements, I'd suggest better marketing since the industry tends to market these tools as security experts, which isn't true."

"Currently, Vanta's user access review module is still in development, and we've been giving them continuous feedback to help them improve that."

"Scalability could be improved."

"The main area for improvement in Vanta is the user interface's refresh rate."

"Some of the tool's automated tests do not work the way it should."

"They have an AI generator for the system description for SOC 2, however, the outline is a little sketchy."

"There is a delay with customer support and they are unsure of the answers we need."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Drata's pricing is quite reasonable. Compared to other tools in the market, including its biggest competitor, Vanta, Drata is much cheaper. Even compared to other tools like AuditBoard, which aren’t as good, Drata’s price remains competitive."

"It's one of the more expensive options, but I think it's worth the money if you can afford it."

"I remember that my company used to pay 25,000 USD to use the product...The product's cost is really high, but it is a powerful tool."

"Vanta is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compliance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

841,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

University

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

University

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Drata?

The existing features of Drata are already extensive and costly to integrate. It requires a certain level of development understanding from companies. Improvements could be in the area of reducing ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Drata?

I have been deploying all the services to Australia and USA. These are for customer compliance on HIPAA, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and similar standards.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Drata?

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about Vanta?

The most valuable feature of Vanta is its prebuilt control frameworks.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Vanta?

Every product has a lot of areas to improve. They have an AI generator for the system description for SOC 2, for example, however, the outline is a little sketchy. The system description has to hav...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Vanta?

We're trying to get SOC 2 compliance, and we're trying to get HIPAA compliance.

See all answers

Comparisons

Sprinto vs Drata

Compared 14% of the time

Thoropass vs Drata

Compared 8% of the time

Secureframe Comply vs Drata

Compared 4% of the time

Hyperproof vs Drata

Compared 4% of the time

Wiz vs Drata

Compared 3% of the time

More Drata Competitors

Sprinto vs Vanta

Compared 21% of the time

Thoropass vs Vanta

Compared 11% of the time

Wiz vs Vanta

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Vanta

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager vs Vanta

Compared 7% of the time

More Vanta Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Drata

March 2025

Download Drata product report

Buyer's Guide

Compliance Management

February 2025

Download Vanta product report

Overview

Drata is a powerful tool for automating compliance processes, effectively reducing audit preparation time and continuously monitoring security controls. It is highly valued for its ability to integrate seamlessly with existing tech stacks and manage security for remote teams, ensuring adherence to standards like SOC 2 and HIPAA. Drata enhances organizational efficiency, improves workflows, and supports real-time compliance monitoring, making compliance management less stressful and more accurate.

Drata

Vanta helps companies scale security practices and automate compliance for the industry’s most sought after standards - SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, and CCPA.

Vanta

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Care Directives, Shortcut , Nayya, Heizenrader, Treasury Prime

Buyer's Guide

Drata vs. Vanta

January 2025

Free Report: Drata vs. Vanta

Find out what your peers are saying about Drata vs. Vanta and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

841,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Drata vs. Vanta report.

See our list of best Compliance Management vendors.

We monitor all Compliance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.