Druid vs Oracle Database In-Memory comparison

Apache and Oracle are both solutions in the Embedded Database category. Apache is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0, while Oracle is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.2. Apache holds a 3.3% mindshare in EDS, compared to Oracle’s 8.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Druid

Read 1 Druid review

142 Views
101 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Database In-Memory

Read 31 Oracle Database In-Memory reviews

554 Views
437 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Druid

Oracle Database In-Memory

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Druid and Oracle Database In-Memory based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Firebird, SQLite, Oracle and others in Embedded Database.

To learn more, read our detailed Embedded Database Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Embedded Database

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,207 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Druid

Ranking in Embedded Database

7th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Database In-Memory

Ranking in Embedded Database

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Embedded Database category, the mindshare of Druid is 3.3%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database In-Memory is 8.3%, down from 15.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Embedded Database

Featured Reviews

Kemal Duman

Team Lead, Data Engineering at Nesine.com

Efficiently display real-time data with optimal time series analytics

The primary use case of Druid in our organization is to display data to business units and build real-time dashboards. We are utilizing Druid on a Kubernetes cluster to showcase time-based analytics and run real-time analytics using Key Vault. It is valued for its ability to efficiently show…

Read full review

Laksiri Bala

DB Architect / Consultant at Virtusa Global

Faster processing and improved memory operations have enhanced transaction and analytics efficiency

The valuable features of Oracle Database In-Memory ( /products/oracle-database-in-memory-reviews ) include its capability to bypass disk storage for faster memory operations, which is critical for transactions and analytics. It also offers specific memory areas, like in-memory cache, that act as intermediaries between disk and buffer cache. This feature helps organizations handle real-time memory requirements effectively.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Druid facilitates displaying real-time or near real-time data and time-based analytics to business units."

"The on-premise version is stable. We have different teams and resources for the server side, for admin, and for development. We can easily take care of all the services and applications."

"The scalability is very good."

"The application development is very user-friendly."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its performance optimization within our hardware environment."

"Oracle Database In-Memory is a suite of features that improves performance for real-time analytics and mixed workloads."

"Security is the most valuable feature."

"The product offers high scalability."

"The scalability of the solution is very good. It's able to support large amounts of data."

More Oracle Database In-Memory pros

Cons

"We face challenges with Druid in merging two or more data sources."

"The platform’s pricing needs improvement."

"The product could benefit from enhancements in its graphical user interface."

"I would like Oracle Database In-Memory to include a data replication feature."

"Oracle Database In-Memory is more expensive than Azure, and the support from the Oracle team is not very good, especially since they do not have a support team in our region."

"It would be good if Oracle could reduce downtime when transferring from non-In-Memory to In-Memory."

"Lacks sufficient integration with other tools."

"The product could be more economical."

"We use some partitions in In-Memory. We have a very large table and a low dose. It is very expensive in data to load all of them into In-Memory. It takes up more memory slots in the server, as well as a lot of RAM. We use last partitions on the table. We always need to create a script and make a schedule that can load a last partition in In-Memory. Oracle doesn't have features to do this automatically. I would like them to allow us to load last partitions, as well as other table partitions, in In-Memory. I think a good feature would do that automatically, letting you see a table, load a large partition, and monitor loading memory. It's quite a good feature."

More Oracle Database In-Memory cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The product is expensive."

"Database In-Memory is priced a bit higher than its competitors like Microsoft."

"The platform's licensing cost needs improvement."

"I rate the pricing a zero out of ten because Database In-Memory is too costly."

"It's quite costly and it comes with a fixed price."

"The pricing is pretty good so I rate it an eight out of ten."

"There is a need to make a yearly payment towards the licensing costs, after which there is any to pay towards the support cost attached to the solution."

"The solution's pricing is high."

More Oracle Database In-Memory pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Embedded Database solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Druid?

Druid is free for us as we use the open-source version.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Druid?

We face challenges with Druid in merging two or more data sources. Merging or joining should be done in a more practical manner, facilitating easier combination of both real-time and batch data sou...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Druid?

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Database In-Memory?

We can integrate it with any data sources as well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database In-Memory?

Pricing is justified by the performance and business value offered by Oracle Database In-Memory. Although slightly higher, recent reductions in cloud costs and learning opportunities, such as free ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database In-Memory?

Oracle Database In-Memory could improve by better supporting generative AI challenges, such as hallucination management. Enhancing features like CAG augmentation and cache augmentation could signif...

See all answers

Comparisons

DuckDB vs Druid

Compared 100% of the time

More Druid Competitors

SAP HANA vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 25% of the time

SQL Server vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 15% of the time

DuckDB vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 13% of the time

Progress OpenEdge RDBMS vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Oracle Database In-Memory

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Database In-Memory Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Embedded Database

March 2025

Download Druid product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Database In-Memory

March 2025

Download Oracle Database In-Memory product report

Overview

Druid is designed for workflows where fast ad-hoc analytics, instant data visibility, or supporting high concurrency is important. As such, Druid is often used to power UIs where an interactive, consistent user experience is desired.

Apache

Oracle Database In-Memory transparently accelerates analytics by orders of magnitude while simultaneously speeding up mixed-workload OLTP. With Oracle Database In-Memory, users get immediate answers to business questions that previously took hours.

Oracle Database In-Memory delivers leading-edge in-memory performance without the need to restrict functionality, or accept compromises, complexity and risk. Deploying Oracle Database In-Memory with any existing Oracle Database compatible application is as easy as flipping a switch - no application changes are required. Oracle Database In-Memory is fully integrated with the Oracle Database’s renowned scale-up, scale-out, storage tiering, availability, and security technologies making it the most industrialstrength offering on the market.

The ability to easily perform real-time data analysis together with real-time transaction processing on all existing applications enables organizations to transform into Real-Time Enterprises that quickly make data-driven decisions, respond instantly to customer demands, and continuously optimize all key processes.

For more information on Oracle Database In-Memory, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Shanghai Customs

Find out what your peers are saying about Firebird, SQLite, Oracle and others in Embedded Database. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Embedded Database vendors.

We monitor all Embedded Database reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.