Elastic Security vs Mezmo comparison

Elastic and Mezmo are both solutions in the Log Management category. Elastic is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7, while Mezmo is ranked #53. Elastic holds a 4.8% mindshare in LM, compared to Mezmo’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Mezmo users who would recommend it.

Elastic Security

Read 62 Elastic Security reviews

10,239 Views
8,567 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Mezmo

Read 2 Mezmo reviews

462 Views
273 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Elastic Security

Mezmo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Elastic Security and Mezmo are two options in the security analytics and log management category. Elastic Security seems to have the upper hand due to its data analysis capabilities and customer service, while Mezmo is favored for its intuitive navigation and ease of deployment.

Features: Elastic Security offers comprehensive threat detection, robust analytics, and exceptional integration options, making it highly scalable. It also provides strong big data handling capabilities. Mezmo provides real-time log aggregation, intuitive navigation, and simple configuration, which saves users time and effort.

Room for Improvement: Elastic Security could improve in simplifying its initial setup and configuration processes. Users also seek better interface adjustments. Mezmo could enhance its data processing capabilities and expand its integration options. There is a demand for more robust functionality in log management and data handling.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Elastic Security's deployment is more complex, but it offers proactive and efficient customer service, addressing user concerns effectively. Mezmo's deployment process is smoother and easier, although it lacks responsiveness compared to Elastic's support system.

Pricing and ROI: Elastic Security is cost-effective over time with strong ROI and a scalable model, despite a potentially higher initial setup cost. Mezmo may have a lower initial cost, which could increase with growing needs. Users perceive Elastic as a better long-term investment, while Mezmo seems more affordable initially.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Security vs. Mezmo Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security vs. Mezmo

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 823,875 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Security

Ranking in Log Management

5th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (5th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (16th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (6th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (8th)

Mezmo

Ranking in Log Management

53rd

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Elastic Security is 4.8%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mezmo is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Gajewski Marek

Chief Technology Officer & Co-founder at CS2

Provides good anomaly detection and connectivity reporting

We previously used Splunk but switched to Elastic Security because Splunk was more expensive. Feature-wise, both tools are pretty much the same. They have almost the same functions. Elastic Security has a much better AI assistant that allows you to ask questions like a normal person. With Elastic Security, I can also predict the price and how much it will cost. Splunks's pricing depends on how much data we use and the different add-ons I have to add. The pricing is much better with Elastic Security.

Read full review

Theodore Omtzigt

President and Founder at STILLWATER SUPERCOMPUTING INC

Has vastly increased our ability to reach SLA targets consistently

Scalability could be improved. We are using it through the IBM cloud deployment and on some of the data centers that are very heavily used, there is a significant lag in the event stream, sometimes 10, 15 minutes behind, which makes the RCA impossible. If an event hits but you don't have the information to look at it, then it's tricky. This is probably not an issue of the product itself, but more a deployment issue. There is something on the IBM side that needs some readjustment to make certain these lags don't happen too often. We now use other tools for back-up in that area. But if you really want to do SIEM type work, then that is an aspect that needs some improvement. It's hard to tell if it's the product or the IBM deployment of it. The user interface is really very productive interactively but for an additional feature, it would be nice if we somehow could encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team so that specific types of actions can be carried out quickly. In particular, when we deal with a customer issue, it may pertain to a particular transaction through the system and each transaction has a unique ID. It would be great if we could query that ID and request all transactions that pertain to a specific ID. For now, we need to find the events, then extract the ID. Once we have that, we can go through the UI to set up the query and filter it to give us a transaction. But it would be really nice if we could simply say, "Here's the ID. Give me all the transactions."

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Enables monitoring of application performance and the ability to predict behaviors."

"The tool's functionality is good for overall security and incident response times."

"The performance is good and it is faster than IBM QRadar."

"The most valuable thing is that this solution is widely used for work management and research. It's easy to jump into the security use case with the same technology."

"The solution has a good community surrounding it for lots of helpful documentation for troubleshooting purposes."

"The feature that we have found the most valuable is scalability."

"The most valuable feature is the scalability. We are in Indonesia, more engineers understand Elastic Security here. So it is easier to scale and also develop. In features, the discovery to query all the logs is very important to us. It is very easy, especially with the query function and the feature to generate alerts and create tools. Sometimes we use the alert security dashboard to monitor our clients."

"The most valuable features of the solution are the prevention methods and the incident alerts."

More Elastic Security pros

"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."

"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."

Cons

"I think because we are a cybersecurity company, the thing that can be improved is the prebuilt tools, especially quality. Compared to its competitor, they still have fewer prebuilt security rules. Elastic Security, in terms of generating alerts, cannot group the same products into one another. Even though the alerts are the same, they still generate them one by one. So, it is very noisy in our dashboard. I would like the Elastic Security admin to group all the same alarms into one alarm so that our dashboard is not noisy."

"We'd like to see some more artificial intelligence capabilities."

"It is difficult to anticipate and understand the space utilization, so more clarity there would be great."

"Elastic Security can be a bit difficult to use if a person only has experience in SMBs with tools like Zoho. The product can also be difficult for those who have never dealt with query language."

"There is an area of improvement in the Logs list. The load list may need to be paginated as there are limits."

"This solution is very hard to implement."

"One thing they could add is a quick step to enable users who don't have a solid background to build a dashboard and quickly search, without difficulty."

"There isn't really a very good user experience. You need a lot of training."

More Elastic Security cons

"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."

"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product offers an amazing pricing structure. Price-wise, the product is very competitive."

"It is easy to deploy, easy to use, and you get everything you need to become operational with it, and have nothing further to pay unless you want the OLED plugin."

"The tool's pricing is flexible and comes at unit cost. You don't have to pay for everything."

"I can say that the product is cheaply priced."

"Its price is fine. Its licensing works on a yearly basis. We have to renew the license every year. I also have a good experience with Darktrace. When we buy Darktrace, we get training free of cost, which is not there in Elastic. We have to pay extra for training. There is certainly room for improvement."

"We use the open-source version, so there is no charge for this solution."

"It's a monthly cost with Elastic SIEM, but I am not sure of the exact cost."

"When compared to other products, the price is average or on the low side."

More Elastic Security pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

10%

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Elastic Security?

Elastic provides the capability to index quickly due to the reverse indexes it offers. This data is crucial as it contains critical information. The reverse index allows fast data indexing because ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Security?

Elastic Security is cost-effective compared to Defender and CrowdStrike. The pricing is reasonable, especially for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs), making it a viable option for businesses building...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Wazuh vs Elastic Security

Compared 31% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Elastic Security

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Elastic Security

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Elastic Security

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Elastic Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Elastic Security Competitors

Datadog vs Mezmo

Compared 50% of the time

Cribl vs Mezmo

Compared 50% of the time

More Mezmo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security

December 2024

Download Elastic Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

December 2024

Download Mezmo product report

Also Known As

Elastic SIEM, ELK Logstash

LogDNA

Learn More

Elastic

Mezmo

Overview

Elastic Security is a robust, open-source security solution designed to offer integrated threat prevention, detection, and response capabilities across an organization's entire digital estate. Part of the Elastic Stack (which includes Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana), Elastic Security leverages the power of search, analytics, and data aggregation to provide real-time insight into threats and vulnerabilities. It is a comprehensive platform that supports a wide range of security needs, from endpoint protection to cloud and network security, making it a versatile choice for organizations looking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.

Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.

Additional offerings and benefits:

The platform utilizes advanced analytics, machine learning algorithms, and anomaly detection to identify threats and suspicious activities.
It offers extensive integration options with other tools and platforms, facilitating a more cohesive and comprehensive security ecosystem.
With Kibana, users gain access to powerful visualization tools and dashboards that provide real-time insight into security data.

Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.

Today’s enterprises must manage a massive amount of machine data. They require a platform that enables engineering teams to deliberately route and store structured and unstructured data for different teams with unique use cases. Legacy platforms weren’t made for this moment.
‍
Mezmo, formerly LogDNA, lets organizations ingest, process, route, analyze, and store all of their log data. Purpose-built for modern engineering teams—including developers, SREs, IT Operations, and Security Engineers—the Mezmo platform is trusted by thousands of companies for SaaS, cloud, and hybrid applications.

Sample Customers

Texas A&M, U.S. Air Force, NuScale Power, Martin's Point Health Care

Instacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security vs. Mezmo

December 2024

Free Report: Elastic Security vs. Mezmo

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Security vs. Mezmo and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Elastic Security vs. Mezmo report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.