Elastic Security vs NetWitness NDR comparison

Elastic and NetWitness are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Elastic is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5, while NetWitness is ranked #57. Additionally, 86% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of NetWitness users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

NetWitness NDR and Elastic Security compete in the NDR and SIEM markets. Elastic Security appears to have an edge due to its feature-rich offerings, whereas NetWitness NDR is noted for its customer support and ease of deployment.

Features: NetWitness NDR users value advanced threat detection, efficient traffic analysis, and real-time monitoring. Elastic Security is appreciated for its scalability, comprehensive search capabilities, and seamless integration with other products. Elastic Security has a broader feature set and better integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: NetWitness NDR needs better documentation, enhanced analytics, and improved reporting. Elastic Security requires better alert management, reduced false positives, and enhanced user interface. Elastic Security's focus on alert management is particularly critical.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetWitness NDR is favored for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Elastic Security users find deployment manageable but sophisticated. NetWitness NDR stands out for its ease of deployment and superior customer support.

Pricing and ROI: NetWitness NDR has higher setup costs justified by its performance and support. Elastic Security offers a better cost-benefit ratio with extensive features, making it a compelling choice for pricing and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Security vs. NetWitness NDR Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security vs. NetWitness NDR

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Torq

Featured Reviews

reviewer2767650

Senior Consultant at a university with 10,001+ employees

Have found automation to save analyst time but miss more accurate data classification

From our research and testing with the tool, we determined there need to be modifications and changes to train the LLM on the back end. It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet. It was unable to do that sort of classification. We concluded this tool would be more suitable for initial ticket management rather than security automation. Regarding data handling, I would give preference to Torq. For case management, Cortex and its dashboards prove more useful. Cortex and Palo's solutions do not have as much capability as Torq provides with the same tools. However, Torq's dashboards could be improved, especially on the case management side.

Read full review

Laurentiu Popescu

Chief Product Officer at ClusterPower

Has improved threat detection with deep log analysis and streamlined investigation workflows

The most useful features I find in Elastic Security are the forensic ones that allow us to carry deeper analysis into the logs for in-depth investigations, and the dashboards, with the reporting dashboard being quite user-friendly. Elastic Security is quite good at identifying threats, as it is part of the deep investigation tool that I mentioned before. Unless we need to look further into a certain log, we can carry out a deeper analysis and forensics on those particular logs. I can assess the impact of Elastic Security's real-time data analysis on our threat response efficiency as working pretty good. We are looking for real-time analysis because we have a continuous inflow of logs from different sources: from our cloud, from Active Directory, from our network. So it works pretty well.

Read full review

reviewer1799727

Manager, IT Security Operations at a non-profit with 11-50 employees

Reliable and good support but can be expensive

I have no real complaints about the solution. Threat detection could be better. They need to enhance their threat intelligence feeds. We would like to have more IOCs or more trade intelligence to not only rely on the intelligence of the engineer in charge but to have some threat intelligence and some seeds of IOCs and to have the host have some artificial intelligence to reduce the number of false positives. I don't see this solution being very scalable. The solution is pricey.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"As an analyst, it has demonstrated potential to reduce workforce requirements and time needed for related activities."

"The most valuable thing is that this solution is widely used for work management and research. It's easy to jump into the security use case with the same technology."

"The solution's most valuable features are anomaly detection and connectivity reporting."

"What customers found most valuable in Elastic Security feature-wise is the search capability, in particular, the way of writing the search query and the speed of searching for results."

"Elastic Security offers advanced features such as machine learning and integration with ChatGPT."

"The most valuable feature is the search function, which allows me to go directly to the target to see the specific line a customer is searching for."

"The scalability is good. It can be scaled easily in the production environment."

"It's not very complicated to install Elastic."

"The indexes allow you to get your results quickly. The filtering and log passing is the advantage of Logstash."

More Elastic Security pros

"We've contacted technical support several times. They've been very good. They have been able to help us resolve our issues."

"NetWitness Endpoint's most valuable features are its interoperability across many different operating systems and the ease of pivoting from network to endpoint via a single console."

"It is stable. We have been using it for some time, without any issues."

"It is very easy to use, and its usability is great. The use cases are also very easy. The visualizations of the use cases are magnificent. You cannot find this in any other solution. From my point of view, it is great."

"It helps our security team respond more accurately when there are threats, then we get less false positives or negatives."

"The log correlation is good."

"It's a scalable solution. We have around five to eight customers using RSA NetWitness Endpoint, and we hope to increase the number of users."

"The most valuable feature of RSA NetWitness Network is the single unified dashboard from which you can manage all the different products of RSA. Additionally, the integration with native applications is good."

More NetWitness NDR pros

Cons

"It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet."

"Elastic sometimes does not correctly identify threats or anomalies. It might not classify an issue as malicious or critical accurately."

"There is an area of improvement in the Logs list. The load list may need to be paginated as there are limits."

"The solution could offer better reporting features."

"The process of designing dashboards is a little cumbersome in Kibana. Unless you are an expert, you will not be able to use it. The process should be pretty straightforward. The authentication feature is what we are looking for. We would love to have a central authentication system in the open-source edition without the need for a license or an enterprise license. If they can give at least a simple authentication system within a company. In a large organization, authentication is very essential for security because logs can contain a lot of confidential data. Therefore, an authentication feature for who accesses it should be there."

"The biggest challenge has been related to the implementation."

"Improvements in Elastic Security could include refining and normalizing queries to make them more user-friendly, enhancing the user experience with better documentation, and addressing any latency issues."

"The solution's basic setup takes time, and a lot of effort is required from the beginning to make it actually work."

"There isn't really a very good user experience. You need a lot of training."

More Elastic Security cons

"We would like to see the hunting and investigation features of this solution improved, in order to provide better visibility of issues."

"The deployment process is complex. I don't know why, but this solution will suddenly stop working. Logs stop coming. Often, one thing or another stops working. Most of the time, one of my team members is working with troubleshooting and working with technical support. Log passing is also one of the biggest challenge."

"The contamination feature could be improved."

"The threat intelligence could improve in RSA NetWitness Endpoint."

"When analyzing something, you have to click several times. It requires a lot of effort to find something."

"The solution is modular, for example you can buy the RSA ePack, which you buy as a module is not part of the conduit solution. They could include it and have it as an all-in-one solution."

"NetWitness Endpoint's blocking feature does not work properly - if there's a malicious process, it's not possible to kill it via a custom rule unless and until it's flagged as malicious."

"The solution lacks a reporting engine."

More NetWitness NDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"This is an open-source product, so there are no costs."

"We are using the free, open-source version of this solution."

"The pricing is in the middle. I think it is not an expensive experience if we compare it with big names, for example, QRadar, and also Oxide. I think Elastic Security is quite cheap. I would rate the pricing of this solution a five out of ten."

"Elastic Security is free to use."

"There is no charge for using the open-source version."

"Compared to other tools, Elastic Security is a cheaper solution."

"The tool's pricing is flexible and comes at unit cost. You don't have to pay for everything."

"The solution is not expensive and costs around ten dollars a month."

More Elastic Security pricing and cost advice

"They can easily adjust if you have the requirements which are required. If you have a budget cut or a budget constraint, they can bend."

"It is highly scalable. It can be bought based on your requirements."

"The price of the solution depends on the environment. If the environment is large then it will cost more. However, the larger the environment with more endpoints, you will receive an increased discount. If the environment is very small, then you might think it is expensive. It is always better to buy in bulk to receive a discount. The minimum number of assets is usually 500, with discounts on 1000 and 2000."

"With RSA, there is flexibility in choosing the service, products, and the range that meets your requirement, as well as they are flexible in terms of pricing."

"It is an expensive product."

"We are on a three-year contract to use RSA NetWitness Network."

"I do not have any opinion on the pricing or licensing of the product."

"The cost depends on the number of endpoints that you want to monitor, but it is not expensive."

More NetWitness NDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	40
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Torq?

From our research and testing with the tool, we determined there need to be modifications and changes to train the LL...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Torq?

I used Torq for conducting one of the proof of evaluations for a vendor we are connected with. I am currently working...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Torq?

One of our members uses AWS, and we receive their feed. This involves triaging AWS-related logs. While I do not have ...

See all answers

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several time...

See all answers

What do you like most about Elastic Security?

Elastic provides the capability to index quickly due to the reverse indexes it offers. This data is crucial as it con...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Security?

I am satisfied with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing cost. It is a pure 10.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tines vs Torq

Compared 50% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs Torq

Compared 14% of the time

Blink Ops vs Torq

Compared 13% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Torq

Compared 10% of the time

Swimlane vs Torq

Compared 7% of the time

More Torq Competitors

Wazuh vs Elastic Security

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Elastic Security

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Elastic Security

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Elastic Security

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Elastic Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Elastic Security Competitors

Darktrace vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 9% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 5% of the time

Wazuh vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 5% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 5% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 4% of the time

More NetWitness NDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

December 2025

Download Torq product report

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security

January 2026

Download Elastic Security product report

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness NDR

December 2025

Download NetWitness NDR product report

Also Known As

No data available

Elastic SIEM, ELK Logstash

RSA ECAT, NetWitness Network

Overview

Torq provides advanced automation capabilities, enabling organizations to streamline operations and enhance efficiency. It's designed to address complex workflows, reducing manual efforts and improving productivity.

Leveraging automation, Torq assists companies in managing intricate processes with agility and precision, making it indispensable for those seeking to optimize their workflows. Its robust platform integrates smoothly into current infrastructures, minimizing disruptions while enhancing operational capacities.

What are Torq's standout features?

Automation Workflows: Streamlines repetitive tasks to enhance efficiency.
Seamless Integration: Connects with existing systems effortlessly.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business demands efficiently.

What benefits should you look for in reviews?

Productivity Gains: Significant improvement in task completion rates.
Cost Reduction: Decreases manual labor costs through automation.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates better communication among teams.

Torq's capabilities are especially beneficial in industries like finance and healthcare where intricate workflows and compliance requirements are common. Automation in these sectors supports better data management and regulatory adherence, providing a decisive edge in operational efficiency.

Torq

Elastic Security is a robust, open-source security solution designed to offer integrated threat prevention, detection, and response capabilities across an organization's entire digital estate. Part of the Elastic Stack (which includes Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana), Elastic Security leverages the power of search, analytics, and data aggregation to provide real-time insight into threats and vulnerabilities. It is a comprehensive platform that supports a wide range of security needs, from endpoint protection to cloud and network security, making it a versatile choice for organizations looking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.

Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.

Additional offerings and benefits:

The platform utilizes advanced analytics, machine learning algorithms, and anomaly detection to identify threats and suspicious activities.
It offers extensive integration options with other tools and platforms, facilitating a more cohesive and comprehensive security ecosystem.
With Kibana, users gain access to powerful visualization tools and dashboards that provide real-time insight into security data.

Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.

Elastic

Using a centralized combination of network and endpoint analysis, behavioral analysis, data science techniques and threat intelligence, NetWitness NDR helps analysts detect and resolve known and unknown attacks while automating and orchestrating the incident response lifecycle. With these capabilities on one platform, security teams can collapse disparate tools and data into a powerful, blazingly fast user interface.

NetWitness

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Texas A&M, U.S. Air Force, NuScale Power, Martin's Point Health Care

ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security vs. NetWitness NDR

December 2025

Free Report: Elastic Security vs. NetWitness NDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Security vs. NetWitness NDR and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Elastic Security vs. NetWitness NDR report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors, best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors, and best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.