NetWitness NDR and Elastic Security compete in the NDR and SIEM markets. Elastic Security appears to have an edge due to its feature-rich offerings, whereas NetWitness NDR is noted for its customer support and ease of deployment.
Features: NetWitness NDR users value advanced threat detection, efficient traffic analysis, and real-time monitoring. Elastic Security is appreciated for its scalability, comprehensive search capabilities, and seamless integration with other products. Elastic Security has a broader feature set and better integration capabilities.
Room for Improvement: NetWitness NDR needs better documentation, enhanced analytics, and improved reporting. Elastic Security requires better alert management, reduced false positives, and enhanced user interface. Elastic Security's focus on alert management is particularly critical.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetWitness NDR is favored for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Elastic Security users find deployment manageable but sophisticated. NetWitness NDR stands out for its ease of deployment and superior customer support.
Pricing and ROI: NetWitness NDR has higher setup costs justified by its performance and support. Elastic Security offers a better cost-benefit ratio with extensive features, making it a compelling choice for pricing and ROI.
It does not require hefty security budgets and can be deployed for enterprise security effectively.
Most of the time when my team encounters issues, they receive responses within 24 hours.
Support is prompt and helpful.
It allows us to think about specific use cases, such as gathering malicious IPs in a single view and analyzing threats based on geolocation.
In terms of stability, I would rate Elastic a solid eight out of ten.
CrowdStrike and Defender have more established threat intelligence integration due to having a larger client base.
My security testing team continuously reports vulnerabilities, and we have to fix and update the versions frequently.
Elastic Security consumes a lot of resources, requiring a substantial deployment setup.
This is beneficial for SMEs as they do not need extensive budgets for security solutions.
The pricing is reasonable, especially for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs), making it a viable option for businesses building their security infrastructure.
Elastic Security is considered cost-effective, especially at lower EPS levels.
The platform provides more visibility and requires less effort in monitoring.
Elastic Security is as flexible and configurable as Microsoft Sentinel.
We require rapid processing speed for alerts and event data, and Elastic Security is very efficient at handling this level of data.
Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.
Additional offerings and benefits:
Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.
Using a centralized combination of network and endpoint analysis, behavioral analysis, data science techniques and threat intelligence, NetWitness NDR helps analysts detect and resolve known and unknown attacks while automating and orchestrating the incident response lifecycle. With these capabilities on one platform, security teams can collapse disparate tools and data into a powerful, blazingly fast user interface.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
