ESET Endpoint Encryption vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption comparison

"It is very secure and we have finally decided to use this after a thorough check. The interface is easy to navigate."

"The solution's UI is user-friendly. Even a non-technical person can use it."

"The setup is getting easier."

"The most valuable feature of ESET Endpoint Encryption is its rate of capturing viruses and malware."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The tool does not slow down the computer."

"The usability is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature of ESET Endpoint Encryption is the high level of encryption protection."

"The management console gives us the ability to quickly control who sees what, ensures we are on the latest version, and up-to-date."

"The encryption feature is very good."

"The most valuable feature is that it works in the background so that the end-users are not aware of what is happening on the laptop."

"We use it for protecting accounts, which is its most valuable feature."

"I like the management aspect of this solution. You don't want to have end-users tweak or set it themselves, so the fact that you could do it from a central point helped us a lot."

"It helps us put antivirus solutions in place and prevent malware from getting to our machines."

"The solution is pretty stable."

"You get updates and other encrypted files easily."

"Integration with central management needs improvement."

"The solution should have better synchronization with active directory users and passwords for use in the encryption."

"The overall compatibility of the device is an area where the solution lacks."

"I would like more robust reporting as part of the Remote Administrator."

"The product should be more responsive regarding feedback if it detects something in our infrastructure. I believe there's a backend that their engineers use to detect viruses in our system. We would appreciate it if they could promptly provide feedback and give us recommendations on how to better protect our infrastructure beyond their system. Additionally, we hope for improved integration with the other systems we currently use. It would be beneficial if they could collaborate to create something that facilitates integration between these systems."

"From an admin perspective, the solution's UI could be more user-friendly."

"There should be more frequent updates."

"I would like to see better compatibility with mobile devices."

"I would like to see some features or functionality enhanced in Symantec Endpoint Encryption."

"Its remote deployment should be improved. Currently, there is no remote deployment for Symantec Endpoint Encryption. You have to install it manually. There are some issues with AD integration and the time taken to reflect a password on the Endpoint Encryption Manager when a new user has changed the password, but they are already working on these issues, and these will be resolved in the next release."

"The solution does not have endpoint control."

"I do not find the environment to be very user-friendly."

"The program's disk encryption is not very friendly with Microsoft OS updates. We have a problem with updates failing unless we use a time-consuming work-around."

"I would like to have less frequent updates."

"It's a bit difficult to get good support. Their response times are really bad."

"The GUI could use some enhancement, particularly in making option sets easier to locate on client machines."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the highest, I rate its pricing a two."

"It is neither very expensive, nor cheap. Overall it is affordable and there is a long term arrangement between our company and the solution providers for license."

"ESET Endpoint Encryption is moderately priced."

"The National University System dedicates 500 of their 5000 licenses to us, which is $14/yr per device. Most companies are paying $99 or $120 per device a year."

"Instead of installing ESET on each machine at each location, we just do it remotely. This has been a time saver for us."

"The pricing is mid-ranged and could be more cost-effective."

"We paid for an annual subscription, and it was reasonable."

"Licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"Depending on how many modules you will use (up to five) the licensing will be more expensive."

"Although the performance and stability of this solution are good, our challenge is the price tag. You buy the solution once, but you also have to keep on buying the licenses yearly."

"We hold an annual license, and their pricing is competitive, falling into the affordable range."

"The licensing costs yearly are $5000."

"Symantec Endpoint Encryption is not expensive."

"They have two solutions for encryption including Symantec Endpoint Encryption and PGP Endpoint Encryption. With one PGP license, you can deploy the two solutions. The PGP license gives you two options."

"Considering the fluctuation in exchange rates in our part of the world, we find it generally affordable."

"There is a license required for this solution."