We performed a comparison between ESET Endpoint Encryption and Symantec Endpoint Encryption based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Encryption solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very secure and we have finally decided to use this after a thorough check. The interface is easy to navigate."
"ESET Endpoint Encryption works as an antivirus system."
"The tool does not slow down the computer."
"The product is easy to implement and configure."
"The usability is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of ESET Endpoint Encryption is the high level of encryption protection."
"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The setup is getting easier."
"The encryption feature is very good."
"The management console gives us the ability to quickly control who sees what, ensures we are on the latest version, and up-to-date."
"We have been very satisfied with the solution's security capabilities."
"Antivirus, URL filtering, and firewall protection are the most effective features for data protection."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use."
"It helps us put antivirus solutions in place and prevent malware from getting to our machines."
"We find the dashboard, endpoint mobile encryption, and email encryption valuable."
"Overall Symantec Endpoint Encryption is a reasonable solution."
"Integration with central management needs improvement."
"If you have issues with your network, you can't get updates, which is a problem."
"I would like to see better compatibility with mobile devices."
"Sometimes the server console is very slow, so the performance could be improved."
"There could be an option for users to restart the system without a password."
"The initial setup could be made easier."
"The solution should have better synchronization with active directory users and passwords for use in the encryption."
"I would like more robust reporting as part of the Remote Administrator."
"More features need to be included in the encryption software."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"One feature that is lacking is integration with Symantec Information Centric (ICT). As it is now, I don't see how to integrate the encryption with ICT, and in my opinion this is an area that certainly requires encryption, even though it's no longer supported by Broadcom."
"I think that they should improve the on-premises version to include the manageability and simplicity that is available on the cloud."
"Upgrades from one version to another may only sometimes be straightforward, especially if one needs a clearer understanding of the process."
"The solution presently doesn't let network folder encryption be done on Macintosh."
"There are other solutions in the market that have new features. The feature could improve."
"What I didn't find helpful in the version we used is the fact that all devices had to be on the same network for us to push through the encryption."
ESET Endpoint Encryption is ranked 6th in Endpoint Encryption with 13 reviews while Symantec Endpoint Encryption is ranked 7th in Endpoint Encryption with 34 reviews. ESET Endpoint Encryption is rated 8.4, while Symantec Endpoint Encryption is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Encryption writes "A reasonably priced solution that is an easy-to-use and effective at the same time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Endpoint Encryption writes "Provides a centralized management console and a straightforward initial setup process ". ESET Endpoint Encryption is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Sophos SafeGuard and WinMagic SecureDoc, whereas Symantec Endpoint Encryption is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, McAfee Complete Data Protection, Cisco Secure Endpoint, Digital Guardian and ZENworks Suite. See our ESET Endpoint Encryption vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption report.
See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.