Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs Spirent TestCenter comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...
Ranking in Network Diagnostics
11th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (70th), IT Operations Analytics (15th), Network Packet Capture (7th)
Spirent TestCenter
Ranking in Network Diagnostics
1st
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Diagnostics category, the mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is 0.9%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent TestCenter is 32.6%, up from 30.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Diagnostics
 

Featured Reviews

Out West - PeerSpot reviewer
Great for identifying application interdependencies with helpful support but needs better visualizations
We're just trying to identify the application interdependencies, which normally reside on different servers, including web servers, database servers, enterprise service bus, et cetera, up to your presentation layer before we start moving stuff around. Normally, the reason why we use these tools is to understand what assets we have, where they're deployed, and how they enter and operate before we decide to go move something from point A to point B. The solution is going to allow me to establish a wave or migration plan where you have different waves of migration and then you actually have move groups to try and get your application moved from A to B seamlessly. A to B could be on-premise to on-premise. It could be on-premise to cloud. Et cetera. The solution can tell me what components can I deploy, for example, into a cloud space, without having to refactor my applications since that can be quite time-consuming and costly.
reviewer1153692 - PeerSpot reviewer
The separation into modules for tasks like traffic analysis and security is advantageous
The compact type for different transceivers like SFP, QSFP, and others is a bit limited. I would ask Spirent to consider a broader range of form factor types, like OSFP or QSFPPD. An easier-to-use, customized test report form would improve the user's experience, as current forms could be more visually appealing. Furthermore, a more intuitive control platform would enhance interfacing.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This solution is more applications reference architecture focused. Its benefit is that it specializes in that space."
"The most valuable features are security detections, perimeter detection, dashboards, and alerts."
"Wire data analytics."
"Not only can you look at the protocol import level. It also has a live PCAP analysis."
"The most valuable feature is the way it handles data, from Layer 2 up to Layer 7. We can see everything that happens in the network."
"There are many valuable features in this product, but probably the biggest is the customization capability it has."
"Spirent TestCenter is very versatile with various functions. One of the most beneficial functions is strong optical connectivity testing."
"I find the modularity of Spirent TestCenter to be a strong point."
"I find the modularity of Spirent TestCenter to be a strong point."
 

Cons

"I would improve the Rule-Based Access Control (RBAC) by providing granular access control to the data."
"They either have to go broad or decide what their bread and butter is and get really good at that."
"We'd like to see a local presence within the region in order to have seamless service whether it's the support, the implementation, or professional services."
"This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."
"They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement."
"Network visibility is something that needs to be improved."
"The compact type for different transceivers like SFP, QSFP, and others is a bit limited."
"The solution could improve by making the interface better. I would like to see more interfaces with higher bit rates and different compactor times."
"The compact type for different transceivers like SFP, QSFP, and others is a bit limited."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair considering the value provided."
"The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years."
"The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it."
"The pricing of the solution is reasonable. When promoted through a seasonal marketing campaign the price is good and attractive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Diagnostics solutions are best for your needs.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
58%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
6%
Healthcare Company
3%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Spirent TestCenter?
Pricing for Spirent TestCenter is considered a lower price point, which is a positive aspect.
What needs improvement with Spirent TestCenter?
The compact type for different transceivers like SFP, QSFP, and others is a bit limited. I would ask Spirent to consider a broader range of form factor types, like OSFP or QSFPPD. An easier-to-use,...
What is your primary use case for Spirent TestCenter?
I have used Spirent TestCenter for testing optical transceivers and checking interoperability tests. I utilize it as an auto-transfer test and for traffic monitoring and checking.
 

Also Known As

No data available
TestCenter
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Alaska Airlines, bet365, Concur, McKesson, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Practice Fusion, Seattle Children's Hospital, Steward Health Care System
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Spirent TestCenter and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.