F5 Distributed Cloud Services vs Invicti comparison

F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Read 29 Invicti reviews

185 Views
101 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Invicti and F5 Distributed Cloud Services compete in web application security and cloud services. Invicti has an advantage in cost-effectiveness and ease of use, while F5 Distributed Cloud Services stands out for its comprehensive feature offerings.

Features: Invicti offers automated web application security testing, strong vulnerability detection, and intuitive setup. F5 Distributed Cloud Services provides advanced security for multi-cloud environments, application protection, and load balancing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Invicti has a user-friendly deployment process with responsive support. F5 Distributed Cloud Services requires a more complex deployment but provides extensive customer support resources.

Pricing and ROI: Invicti has a competitive pricing model with low initial costs and fast ROI. F5 Distributed Cloud Services entails a higher setup cost but offers long-term ROI due to extensive security features and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed F5 Distributed Cloud Services vs. Invicti Report (Updated: February 2025).

F5 Distributed Cloud Services vs. Invicti

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Ranking in API Security

7th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (11th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (20th), AWS Marketplace (28th)

Invicti

Ranking in API Security

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (15th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the API Security category, the mindshare of F5 Distributed Cloud Services is 3.4%, down from 5.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Invicti is 2.5%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Security

Featured Reviews

Filip Mikulik

IT Analyst at Atlas.cz, a.s.

Protects web applications with comprehensive security features

All features are valuable. In a multi-cloud or distributed cloud, there are many protection possibilities from data to web application or API protection, including bot mitigation. This is a comprehensive package for web application security. The main benefit is Web App Security, offering a complete security package from DDoS to web application firewall, API protection, and bot mitigation.

Read full review

Kunal M

Capability Center Leader, ETRM Platforms at Shell

Proactive scanning measures and realistic audit recommendations enhance development focus

Invicti's proactive scanning measures vulnerabilities each time we deploy or push code to a new environment. This feature helps us focus on priorities and prioritize the development team's effort, integrating seamlessly with DevOps to facilitate proactive scans of environments. Invicti also provides audit recommendations that are quite realistic, making it easy to discuss plans with developers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In a multi-cloud or distributed cloud, there are many protection possibilities from data to web application or API protection, including bot mitigation."

"F5 is known for being the best load balancer in the market. Customers with an existing module can easily adopt additional modules without investing in new hardware."

"The main benefit is Web App Security, offering a complete security package from DDoS to web application firewall, API protection, and bot mitigation."

"The best features of Invicti are its ability to confirm access vulnerabilities, SSL injection vulnerabilities, and its connectors to other security tools."

"The scanner and the result generator are valuable features for us."

"It correctly parses DOM and JS and has really good support for URL Rewrite rules, which is important for today's websites."

"It has a comprehensive resulting mechanism. It is a one-stop solution for all your security testing mechanisms."

"I like that it's stable and technical support is great."

"The scanner is light on the network and does not impact the network when scans are running."

"Netsparker has valuable features, including the ability to scan our website, an interactive approach, and security data integration."

"When we try to manually exploit the vulnerabilities, it often takes time to realize what's going on and what needs to be done."

More Invicti pros

Cons

"The pricing could be adjusted to better meet the needs of typical customers in regions like Poland, where the product is considered too expensive."

"The main issue is integration with other parts or products of F5, like on-premise WAF. There are some problems, mainly from the perspective of implementation and customer expectations, which sometimes differ from reality."

"The main issue is integration with other parts or products of F5, like on-premise WAF."

"Invicti's reporting capabilities need enhancement. We need enterprise-level information instead of repo-level details. Unlike Appiro, Invicti does not provide portfolio-level insights into vulnerability remediation over time."

"The scanning time, complexity, and authentication features of Invicti could be improved."

"The scanner itself should be improved because it is a little bit slow."

"Invicti takes too long with big applications, and there are issues with the login portal."

"The license could be better. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license. It's a major hindrance that we are facing while scanning applications, and we have to be sure that the URLs are the same and not different so that we do not end up consuming another license for it. Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. The licensing is tied to the URL, and it's restricted. If you have a URL that you scanned once, like a website, you cannot retry that same license. If you are scanning the same website but in a different domain or different URL, you might end up paying for a second license. It would also be better if they provided proper support for multi-factor authentications. In the next release, I would like them to include good multi-factor authentication support."

"The custom attack preparation screen might be improved."

"The higher level vulnerabilities like Cross-Site Scripting, SQL Injection, and other higher level injection attacks are difficult to highlight using Netsparker."

"The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved."

More Invicti cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"It is competitive in the security market."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

52%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 Distributed Cloud Services?

I am not involved in sales, so I do not deal with the pricing aspect directly. I give the cost of the solution a four out of ten since it is not a cheap product.

What needs improvement with F5 Distributed Cloud Services?

It's a long way to be perfect, of course, as with all solutions. The main issue is integration with other parts or products of F5, like on-premise WAF. There are some problems, mainly from the pers...

What is your primary use case for F5 Distributed Cloud Services?

There are two main use cases for Distributed Call Services: DDoS or Distributed attacks protection and WAF web application security or firewall.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

As a technical user, I do not handle pricing or licensing, but I am aware that Invicti offers flexible licensing models based on organizational needs.

What do you like most about Invicti?

The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan.

What needs improvement with Invicti?

Invicti's reporting capabilities need enhancement. We need enterprise-level information instead of repo-level details. Unlike Appiro, Invicti does not provide portfolio-level insights into vulnerab...

F5 Silverline Managed Services vs F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Comparisons

Compared 26% of the time

Akamai vs F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Compared 16% of the time

Akamai API Security vs F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Compared 14% of the time

Azure Front Door vs F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Compared 11% of the time

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs F5 Distributed Cloud Services

Compared 11% of the time

More F5 Distributed Cloud Services Competitors

Acunetix vs Invicti

Compared 19% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Invicti

Compared 13% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

Product Reports

Download F5 Distributed Cloud Services product report

CDN

March 2025

Download Invicti product report

March 2025

Also Known As

No data available

Netsparker

Overview

F5 Distributed Cloud Services excel in enhancing security, optimizing web application delivery, and ensuring robust network performance. Users value its integrated Web Application Firewall, DDoS protection, global server load balancing, and intuitive management interface. It boosts organizational efficiency, reduces operational costs, and scales seamlessly, making it essential for businesses operating in distributed environments.

Invicti helps DevSecOps teams automate security tasks and save hundreds of hours each month by identifying web vulnerabilities that matter. Combining dynamic with interactive testing (DAST + IAST) and software composition analysis (SCA), Invicti scans every corner of an app to find what other tools miss with 99.98% accuracy, delivering on the promise of Zero Noise AppSec. Invicti helps discover all web assets — even ones that are lost, forgotten, or created by rogue departments. With an array of out-of-the-box integrations, DevSecOps teams can get ahead of their workloads to hit critical deadlines, improve processes, and communicate more effectively while reducing risk and hitting the ROI goals.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank