Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

FileMaker vs FoxPro comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

FileMaker
Ranking in Non-Relational Databases
6th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
FoxPro
Ranking in Non-Relational Databases
1st
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Non-Relational Databases category, the mindshare of FileMaker is 7.3%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FoxPro is 17.1%, up from 9.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Non-Relational Databases
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1540227 - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly, very stable, reasonable price, integrates well, and has all sorts of capabilities
They're always improving it, and I have been quite pleased with their improvements. There is some organizational stuff that I'd like to see done differently. They should make a structure so that you can have the data in one file and the app, the scripts, and the program in another file. I would like to be able to easily share scripts between different databases. I write stuff, and some of the functions are shared across different databases. So, I have to copy them from one database to another. I wouldn't mind an infrastructure where I had a file, and on loading the program, this file is loaded with the functions that I had written. I can then call them from any database that I happen to be using. Currently, you have a database open that has all of its data pieces and program pieces, and then you open another database that has got all of its data pieces and program pieces. Nothing is shared between them. When I write a complex function and I want to use it in two or three different databases, I have to copy it to each one of them and also remember where all it is used. It would be good if it has a little bit different organizational structure so that you could put your shared stuff in one place, and it loads the stuff. It is just an architectural difference. I've sent this requirement to them, but I doubt if that's going to happen. It is a huge system, and making changes for a single individual doesn't happen that quickly.
it_user4401 - PeerSpot reviewer
FoxPro software development system is used in designing sophisticated database applications
- I noticed that FoxPro is slow and this was a problem for me - It does not have high level of administrative security - It is not very portable, for using a very portable DMS I recommend Microsoft Access - When I needed to process large quantities of records per hour I was dissapointed by FoxPro
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Non-Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
824,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
17%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Media Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

VUHL, Reynolds Services Inc., Market Refrigeration Specialists, Sea Breeze Farm, Jordan Lindblad, Henry Schein Dental
Vocational Training Council, Advantage Sales and Marketing, Capital Nomura Securities Public Company Limited, King Saud University
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Actian and others in Non-Relational Databases. Updated: December 2024.
824,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.