Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

FIS Protegent vs Thomson Reuters Accelus comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

FIS Protegent
Ranking in GRC
30th
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Thomson Reuters Accelus
Ranking in GRC
28th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the GRC category, the mindshare of FIS Protegent is 0.5%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Thomson Reuters Accelus is 1.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
GRC
 

Featured Reviews

it_user948 - PeerSpot reviewer
Robust and comprehensive product for Finanancial Services Compliance.
The Protegent surveillance suite of products automates many of the manual financial services / broker dealers compliance processes related to FINRA and the SEC. The suite is comprehensive and fairly easy to implement (depending on your business model and clearing relationships).…
Use Thomson Reuters Accelus?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
54%
Insurance Company
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
Non Profit
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

SunGard Protegent, Protegent
Accelus
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

A Large European Broker, a global asset management firm
Fujitsu, NCDOT, Extraco Banks, Qatar National Bank, EY Team
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, AuditBoard and others in GRC. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.