Fortify on Demand vs ImmuniWeb comparison

Read 7 ImmuniWeb reviews

998 Views
439 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Fortify on Demand

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Fortify on Demand and ImmuniWeb compete in the security solutions category. ImmuniWeb seems to have the upper hand in feature offerings while Fortify on Demand fares better in terms of pricing and customer support.

Features: Fortify on Demand offers a comprehensive security scan, robust integration capabilities, and reliable customer support. ImmuniWeb provides AI-driven testing, generates insightful reports, and delivers adaptive security features.

Room for Improvement: Fortify on Demand could enhance ease of use, better integrate with other tools, and refine its reporting process. ImmuniWeb might improve scalability, offer quicker response times, and simplify its initial setup procedures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortify on Demand is noted for straightforward deployment and dependable customer service. ImmuniWeb's deployment process is more complex, yet customer service receives positive remarks post-deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Fortify on Demand is favored for its cost-effectiveness, suitable for budget-conscious organizations. ImmuniWeb, while more expensive, is viewed as offering robust ROI due to superior feature sets.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortify on Demand vs. ImmuniWeb Report (Updated: January 2025).

Fortify on Demand vs. ImmuniWeb

Download the complete report

Helped 831,071 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortify on Demand

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (9th)

ImmuniWeb

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Attack Surface Management (ASM) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Fortify on Demand is 5.0%, up from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ImmuniWeb is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Jonathan Steyn

Principal Technical Consultant at EOH

Source code analyzer, FPR file generation, reduction of false positives and generates compliance reports, for in-depth analysis

Not challenges with the product itself. The product is very reliable. It does have a steep learning curve. But, again, one thing that Fortify or OpenText does very well is training. There are a lot of free resources and training in the community forums, free training as well as commercial training where users can train on how to use the back-end systems and the scanning engines and how to use command-line arguments because some of the procedures or some of the tools do require a bit of a learning curve. That's the only challenge I've really seen for customers because you have to learn how to use the tool effectively. But Fortify has, in fact, improved its user interface and the way users engage the dashboards and the interfaces. It is intuitive. It's easy to understand. But in some regards, the cybersecurity specialist or AppSec would need a bit of training to engage the user interface and to understand how it functions. But from the point of the reliability index and how powerful the tool is, there's no challenge there. But it's just from a learning perspective; users might need a bit more skill to use the tool. The user interface isn't that tedious. It's not that difficult to understand. When I initially learned how to use the interfaces, I was able to master it within a week and was able to use it quite effectively. So training is required. All skills are needed to learn how to use the tool. I would like to see more enhancements in the dashboards. Dashboards are available. They do need some configuration and settings. But I would like to see more business intelligence capabilities within the tool. It's not particularly a cybersecurity function, but, for instance, business impact analysis or other features where you can actually use business intelligence capabilities within your security tool. That would be remarkable because not only do you have a cybersecurity tool, but you also have a tool that can give you business impact analysis and some other measurements. A bit more intelligence in terms of that from a cybersecurity perspective would be remarkable.

Read full review

Vivek Ashvinbhai Pancholi

Senior Cybersecurity Consultant at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Commendable Solution with Robust Vulnerability Detection Mechanism Suitable for Global Market

The solution helped us with one of our clients in the New York area contacted us about a data breach. In response, we swiftly organized a case meeting involving our client, internal, and email customer support teams. Together, we conducted an incident response, facilitating offline assistance for proper planning and risk management processes. We delved into the details of the data breach, identified how it occurred, and collaborated to rectify the issue. The client expressed satisfaction with the resolution process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Almost all the features are good. This solution has simplified designing and architecting for our solutions. We were early adopters of microservices. Their documentation is good. You don't need to put in much effort in setting it up and learning stuff from scratch and start using it. The learning curve is not too much."

"The static code analyzers are the most valuable features of this solution."

"It improves future security scans."

"The scanning capabilities, particularly for our repositories, have been invaluable."

"Its ability to perform different types of scans, keep everything in one place, and track the triage process in Fortify SSC stands out."

"The most valuable feature is that it connects with your development platforms, such as Microsoft Information Server and Jira."

"It is an extremely robust, scalable, and stable solution."

"t's a cloud-based solution, so there was no installation involved."

More Fortify on Demand pros

"After the assessment, you clearly know which assets require penetration testing."

"The most valuable features are the SLA of Zero false-positives, less time of service development, validation of unlimited patched vulnerabilities, and several others."

"The initial setup process is user-friendly."

"The solution's most valuable feature is reporting."

"I like the fully automated continuous discovery run by ImmuniWeb in the background. We do not need to rerun the same tests or the same scanning against our resources. We need to supply our IP addresses, domain names, and significant resources with special domain names and URLs, and we need to do it only once. Then we always have an up-to-date picture. I also like the integration with our single sign-on system. We do not need to maintain a separate set of usernames or user accounts. We can plug this ImmuniWeb service into our authentication technology, enabling two-factor authentication. We have secure authentication right out of the box. The other important feature I like is the executive view. You can easily switch from a technical view to an executive view and have a helicopter view of the compliance status. We can see how much effort is required and our current status."

"ImmuniWeb is stable."

"ImmuniWeb boasts a robust vulnerability detection mechanism, formidable threat mitigation, and an efficient remediation process, incorporating automation techniques and ALM strategies. The solution is highly stable. The solution is scalable. Editing Key Points for Review "Review about ImmuniWeb" What is our primary use case? We use the solution when we face challenges and urgent attention is needed for complex cases from our clients. To address this, we collaborate with the middleware, internal, and client teams to analyze and sort through intricate logs concerning our business cybersecurity program. How has it helped my organization? The solution helped us with one of our clients in the New York area contacted us about a data breach. In response, we swiftly organized a case meeting involving our client, internal, and email customer support teams. Together, we conducted an incident response, facilitating offline assistance for proper planning and risk management processes. We delved into the details of the data breach, identified how it occurred, and collaborated to rectify the issue. The client expressed satisfaction with the resolution process. What is most valuable? ImmuniWeb boasts a robust vulnerability detection mechanism, formidable threat mitigation, and an efficient remediation process, incorporating automation techniques and ALM strategies. It also focuses on consumer satisfaction and operates in English-speaking markets, primarily required by the UAE, the United States, Canada, and Australia, among other developed countries. For how long have I used the solution? We have been using this product for the past one and half years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? The solution is highly stable. I rate it a perfect ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? The solution is scalable. I rate it a nine out of ten. How are customer service and support? Support is generally excellent"

Cons

"It's still a little bit too complex for regular developers. It takes a little bit more time than usual. I know static code scan is not the main focus of the tool, but the overall time span to scan the code, and even to set up the code scanning, is a bit overwhelming for regular developers."

"The cybersecurity specialist or AppSec would need a bit of training to engage the user interface and to understand how it functions."

"Reporting could be improved."

"It could have a little bit more streamlined installation procedure. Based on the things that I've done, it could also be a bit more automated. It is kind of taking a bunch of different scanners, and SSC is just kind of managing the results. The scanning doesn't really seem to be fully integrated into the SSC platform. More automation and any kind of integration in the SSC platform would definitely be good. There could be a way to initiate scans from SSC and more functionality on the server-side to initiate desk scans if it is not already available."

"The biggest deficiency is the integration with bug tracker systems. It might be better if the configuration screen presented for accessing the bug tracking systems could provide some flexibility."

"New technologies and DevOps could be improved. Fortify on Demand can be slow (slower than other vendors) to support new technologies or new software versions."

"Sometimes when we run a full scan, we have a bunch of issues in the code. We should not have any issues."

"Micro Focus Fortify on Demand cannot be run from a Linux Agent. When we are coding the endpoint it will not work, we have to use Windows Agent. This is something they could improve."

More Fortify on Demand cons

"A great idea would be to make a mobile application for the ImmuniWeb portal so that all information would be available on the go and from a mobile phone as well. It would be much more convenient."

"ImmuniWeb sometimes shows previous scans instead of running tests."

"A great idea would be to support using Discovery on the internal network, allowing delivery of all the features of the current Discovery to internal network resources."

"The product’s interface for the web applications could be similar to Android and iOS versions."

"Its technical support could be better."

"The deployment process on the cloud is straightforward, while on-premise can be complex. Support is generally excellent, although there can be delays in ticket resolution."

"It would be better if they had an automated tagging feature. The tagging functionality currently requires manual tagging, and that's probably the most needed feature from my standpoint. We also do not have enough tools, enough features, or options to display different resources in the way we need. There are basic grouping and some filtering features, but we still cannot fully separate some flavors of our resources. However, we may not be aware of the latest features."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a yearly contract, but I don't remember the dollar amount."

"Fortify on Demand is more expensive than Burpsuite. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten."

"We are still using the trial version at this point but I can already see from the trial version alone that it is a good product. For others, I would say that Fortify on Demand might look expensive at the beginning, but it is very powerful and so you shouldn't be put off by the price."

"There are different costs for Micro Focus Fortify on Demand depending on the assessments you want to use. There is only a standard license needed to use the solution."

"The pricing can be improved because it is complex when compared to the competition."

"Fortify on Demand is moderately priced, but its pricing could be more flexible."

"The licensing was good because the licenses have the heavy centralized server."

"If I exceed one million lines of code, there might be an extra cost or a change in the pricing bracket."

More Fortify on Demand pricing and cost advice

"The platform is expensive if a large development is involved. However, it is less expensive for scheduled-based testing, quarterly or in a year."

"The values of ImmuniWeb are currently significantly below what is valued in the Chilean market for these services and solutions."

"There should be the flexibility to change or add pricing, especially for pay-per-use cases."

"It is pretty expensive."

"ImmuniWeb is relatively cheap. It's a competitive price compared to other products in the marketplace. It's worth the money we are paying for it."

"I use the product's free version. The tool costs around 229 dollars."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,071 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

It helps deploy and track changes easily as per time-to-time market upgrades.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

In comparison with other tools, they're competitive. It is not more expensive than other solutions, but their pricing is competitive. The licenses for Fortify On Demand are generally bought in unit...

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?

In addition to Sitelock and Immuniweb, another option to consider for a 24/7 automated vulnerability monitoring tool to protect web applications is Modshield SB Modshield SB is a web application fi...

What do you like most about ImmuniWeb?

ImmuniWeb is stable.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ImmuniWeb?

I use the product's free version. The tool costs around 229 dollars.

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Fortify on Demand

Comparisons

Compared 19% of the time

Veracode vs Fortify on Demand

Compared 16% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Fortify on Demand

Compared 12% of the time

Coverity vs Fortify on Demand

Compared 10% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Fortify on Demand

Compared 6% of the time

More Fortify on Demand Competitors

Acunetix vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 34% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 29% of the time

Veracode vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 12% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 12% of the time

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning vs ImmuniWeb

Compared 12% of the time

More ImmuniWeb Competitors

Product Reports

Fortify on Demand

Download Fortify on Demand product report

Download ImmuniWeb product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Fortify on Demand

No data available

Learn More

OpenText

https://www.immuniweb.com.

Overview

Fortify on Demand is a web application security testing tool that enables continuous monitoring. The solution is designed to help you with security testing, vulnerability management and tailored expertise, and is able to provide the support needed to easily create, supplement, and expand a software security assurance program without the need for additional infrastructure or resources.

Fortify on Demand Features

Fortify on Demand has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Deployment flexibility
Scalability
Built for DevSecOps
Ease of use
Supports 27+ languages
Real-time vulnerability identification with
Security Assistant
Actionable results in less than 1 hour for most applications with DevOps automation
Expanded coverage, accuracy and remediation details with IAST runtime agent
Continuous application monitoring of production applications
Virtual patches
Supports iOS and Android mobile applications
Security vulnerability identification
Behavioral and reputation analysis

Fortify on Demand Benefits

There are several benefits to implementing Fortify on Demand. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Fast remediation: With Fortify on Demand you can achieve fast remediation throughout the software lifecycle with robust assessments by a team of security experts.

Easy integration: The solution’s integration ecosystem is easy to use, creating a more secure software supply chain.

Security testing: Fortify on Demand covers in-depth mobile app security testing, open-source analysis, and vendor application security management, in addition to static and dynamic testing.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Fortify on Demand solution.

Dionisio V., Senior System Analyst at Azurian, says, "One of the top features is the source code review for vulnerabilities. When we look at source code, it's hard to see where areas may be weak in terms of security, and Fortify on Demand's source code review helps with that." He goes on to add, “Another reason I like Fortify on Demand is because our code often includes open source libraries, and it's important to know when the library is outdated or if it has any known vulnerabilities in it. This information is important to us when we're developing our solutions and Fortify on Demand informs us when it detects any vulnerable open source libraries.”

A Security Systems Analyst at a retailer mentions, “Being able to reduce risk overall is a very valuable feature for us.”

Jayashree A., Executive Manager at PepsiCo, comments, “Once we have our project created with our application pipeline connected to the test scanning, it only takes two minutes. The report explaining what needs to be modified related to security and vulnerabilities in our code is very helpful. We are able to do static and dynamic code scanning. When we are exploring some of the endpoints this solution identifies many loopholes that hackers could utilize for an attack. This has been very helpful and surprising how many vulnerabilities there can be.”

A Principal Solutions Architect at a security firm explains, “Its ability to perform different types of scans, keep everything in one place, and track the triage process in Fortify SSC stands out.”

PeerSpot user Mamta J., Co-Founder at TechScalable, states, "Almost all the features are good. This solution has simplified designing and architecting for our solutions. We were early adopters of microservices. Their documentation is good. You don't need to put in much effort in setting it up and learning stuff from scratch and start using it. The learning curve is not too much."

ImmuniWeb is a global application security company operating in over 50 countries, headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. Most of ImmuniWeb's customers come from regulated industries, such as banking, healthcare, and e-commerce.

ImmuniWeb® AI Platform leverages award-winning AI and Machine Learning technology for acceleration and intelligent automation of Attack Surface Management and Dark Web Monitoring. The data is later leveraged for threat-aware and risk-based Application Penetration Testing for web, mobile, and API security testing. ImmuniWeb is the only company that offers a contractual zero false-positives SLA with a money-back guarantee. ImmuniWeb’s AI technology is a recipient of numerous awards and recognitions, including Gartner Cool Vendor, IDC Innovator, and the winner of “SC Award Europe” in the “Best Usage of Machine Learning and AI” category.

ImmuniWeb® Community Edition runs over 100,000 daily tests, being one of the largest application security communities. ImmuniWeb SA is an ISO 27001 certified and CREST-accredited company.

Sample Customers

SAP, Aaron's, British Gas, FICO, Cox Automative, Callcredit Information Group, Vital and more.

Ebay, United Nations, Next Bank Credit Agricole, Geneva Swiss Bank, Banca Stato, Celgene, SIM University, Heymarket, Swissquote, more...

Fortify on Demand vs. ImmuniWeb