Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs Kiuwan Insights comparison

OpenText and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. OpenText is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2, while Kiuwan is ranked #17. OpenText holds a 11.9% mindshare in SCAS, compared to Kiuwan’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.

Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Read 17 Fortify Static Code Analyzer reviews

1,719 Views
1,159 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Kiuwan Insights

Read 2 Kiuwan Insights reviews

100 Views
53 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Kiuwan Insights

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Fortify Static Code Analyzer and Kiuwan Insights compete in the static code analysis category. Kiuwan emerges as a superior choice when considering cost-effectiveness and user satisfaction, despite Fortify's comprehensive capabilities.

Features: Fortify Static Code Analyzer offers extensive security analysis, deep integration with development tools, and robust reporting. Kiuwan Insights provides significant flexibility, continuous integration capabilities, and a user-friendly interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortify Static Code Analyzer's deployment is complex, often needing professional assistance but offers reliable customer support. In contrast, Kiuwan Insights features a streamlined deployment process with a cloud-centric model, providing prompt customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Fortify Static Code Analyzer involves higher setup costs, aligning with its advanced feature set, potentially delivering high ROI for security-focused organizations. Kiuwan Insights is cost-effective with a flexible pricing structure, offering substantial ROI through its comprehensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. Kiuwan Insights Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. Kiuwan Insights

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Kiuwan Insights

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

17th

Average Rating

4.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of Fortify Static Code Analyzer is 11.9%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan Insights is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Provides extensive language support and enhances secure coding practices

The deployment of Fortify Static Code Analyzer needs to be simplified. It should be easier to install, perhaps through a container-based approach where everything is combined into one image or pack of containers. This change would facilitate easier installations and ensure all necessary components are connected and ready to use.

Read full review

Felix Esteban

Head of Development and Consulting at Logalty

Protects problematic libraries; sorely lacking in customer services

Kiuwan lacks decent support, it's very bad. A couple of years ago an American company bought Kiuwan and support became non-existent. It's a big part of why we're looking to move to another product. We have questions regarding false positives and nobody responds to our tickets. They don't have any answers. If you're looking for a cheaper solution and don't require support, it might be okay, but a large end company that has a lot of questions about how the developers are programming will have trouble.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can really see what's happening after you've developed something."

"Fortify integrates with various development environments and tools, such as IDEs (Integrated Development Environments) and CI/CD pipelines."

"The integration Subset core integration, using Jenkins is one of the good features."

"I like the Fortify taxonomy as it provides us with a list of all of the vulnerabilities found. Fortify release updated rule packs quarterly, with accompanying documentation, that lets us know what new features are being released."

"It's helped us free up staff time."

"The reference provided for each issue is extremely helpful."

"Its flexibility is most valuable. It is such a flexible tool. It can be implemented in a number of ways. It can do anything you want it to do. It can be fully automated within a DevOps pipeline. It can also be used in an ad hoc, special test case scenario and anywhere in between."

"I recommend this product due to its good pricing, extensive language support, valuable features, and additional features like Fortify Academy."

More Fortify Static Code Analyzer pros

"Can help in reducing the number of false positives."

"I have found the interface to be perfect."

Cons

"I know the areas that they are trying to improve on. They've been getting feedback for several years. There are two main points. The first thing is keeping current with static code languages. I know it is difficult because code languages pop up all the time or there are new variants, but it is something that Fortify needs to put a better focus on. They need to keep current with their language support. The second thing is a philosophical issue, and I don't know if they'll ever change it. They've done a decent job of putting tools in place to mitigate things, but static code analysis is inherently noisy. If you just take a tool out of the box and run a scan, you're going to get a lot of results back, and not all of those results are interesting or important, which is different for every organization. Currently, we get four to five errors on the side of tagging, and it notifies you of every tiny inconsistency. If the tool sees something that it doesn't know, it flags, which becomes work that has to be done afterward. Clients don't typically like it. There has got to be a way of prioritizing. There are a ton of filter options within Fortify, but the problem is that you've got to go through the crazy noisy scan once before you know which filters you need to put in place to get to the interesting stuff. I keep hearing from their product team that they're working on a way to do container or docker scanning. That's a huge market mover. A lot of people are interested in that right now, and it is relevant. That is definitely something that I'd love to see in the next version or two."

"It can be tricky if you want to exclude some files from scanning. For instance, if you do not want to scan and push testing files to Fortify Software Security Center, that is tricky with some IDEs, such as IntelliJ. We found that there is an Exclude feature that is not working. We reported that to them for future fixing. It needs some work on the plugins to make them consistent across IDEs and make them easier."

"Not all languages are supported in Fortify."

"Fortify's software security center needs a design refresh."

"The deployment of Fortify Static Code Analyzer needs to be simplified."

"Streamlining the upgrade process and enhancing compatibility would make it easier for us to keep our security tools up-to-date."

"The troubleshooting capabilities of this solution could be improved. This would reduce the number of cases that users have to submit."

"Their licensing is expensive."

More Fortify Static Code Analyzer cons

"The solution has issues detecting intrusive methods."

"The solution is great, but improvement is needed in the number of lines of code allowed, that is the capacity. Pricing can be improved as well."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The setup costs and pricing for Fortify may vary depending on the organization's needs and requirements."

"From our standpoint, we are significantly better off with Fortify due to the favorable pricing we secured five years ago."

"The price of Fortify Static Code Analyzer could be reduced."

"There is a licensing fee, and if you bring them to the company and you want them to do the installation and the implementation in the beginning, there is a separate cost. Similarly, if you want consultation or training, there is a separate cost. I see it as suitable only for enterprises. I do not see it suitable for a small business or individual use."

"It has a couple of license models. The one that we use most frequently is called their flexible deployment. We use this one because it is flexible and based on the number of code-contributing developers in the organization. It includes almost everything in the Fortify suite for one developer price. It gives access to not just the secure code analyzer (SCA) but also to FSC, the secure code. It gives us accessibility to scan central, which is the decentralized scanning farm. It also gives us access to the software security center, which is the vulnerability management platform."

"I rate the pricing of Fortify Static Code Analyzer as a seven out of ten since it is a bit expensive."

"The licensing is expensive and is in the 50K range."

"Although I am not responsible for the budget, Fortify SAST is expensive."

"Pricing can be improved as well."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

Integrating the Fortify Static Code Analyzer into our software development lifecycle was straightforward. It highlights important information beyond just syntax errors. It identifies issues like pa...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

The pricing of Fortify Static Code Analyzer is good, with a flexible model that allows customers to choose a setup that suits their needs. There are some features that require additional purchases,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Black Duck vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Compared 34% of the time

Snyk vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Compared 18% of the time

Veracode vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Compared 13% of the time

Sonatype Lifecycle vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Compared 8% of the time

GitLab vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Compared 7% of the time

More Fortify Static Code Analyzer Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Static Code Analyzer

April 2025

Download Fortify Static Code Analyzer product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Code Analysis

March 2025

Download Kiuwan Insights product report

Also Known As

Fortify Static Code Analysis SAST

Insights SCA

Overview

Fortify Static Code Analyzer (SCA) utilizes numerous algorithms in addition to a dynamic intelligence base of secure coding protocols to investigate an application’s source code for any potential risk of malicious or dangerous threats. Additionally, the solution will prioritize the most critical concerns and give direction on how users can repair those concerns. This solution researches each and every potential route that workflow and data can travel to discover and repair all possible vulnerabilities. Fortify SCA allows users to create safe and secure software quickly. Users are able to discover potential security gaps more quickly with precise outcomes and repair them immediately.

Fortify Static Code Analyzer Benefits

CI/CD pipeline security: Fortify SCA integrates well with third-party tools such as ALM Octane, Atlassian Bamboo, Azure DevOps, Eclipse, Jenkins, and Jira. It offers real-time scan results, immediate recommendations, and collaborative auditing, and finds threats faster. It also discovers and prioritizes weaknesses to reduce risk.
Cost-effective: Improves coding actions by training users as they work to better understand the relationship of static application security testing (SAST). Fortify SCA is able to find more vulnerabilities than other solutions and delivers significantly fewer false positives.
Quick and reliable scanning: Fortify SCA will discover and eradicate weaknesses in byte, binary, or source code. SAST is able to stop the bulk of code issues at the start of development. The solution is able to discover 815 specific categories of risk, works through 27 programming languages and more than one million different APIs. Fortify SCA has a positive rate of 100% in the OWASP 1.2 benchmark.

Fortify Static Code Analyzer Features

Flexible deployment: Using Fortify On Demand, users can work in a complete SaaS environment. Fortify Hosted allows users to use on-premises and SaaS to work in a secure virtual space with complete control. Fortify-On-Prem gives users absolute control of the Fortify SCA solution.
Security assistant: Users have an interactive guide as they create code that provides risk analysis and anticipated outcomes. Security Assistant is an outstanding immediate feedback tool that gives instant results with significantly fewer false positives.
Audit assistant: This feature uses machine learning to reduce manual audit time while prioritizing the most important risks to users' networks. It provides automated audits in minutes. Any manual examinations are reduced, all issues are prioritized in accordance with organizational needs, and Fortify SCA consistently provides audit results to all projects.

Results from Real Users

“Fortify Static Code Analyzer tells us if there are any security leaks or not. If there are, then it's notifying us and does not allow us to pass the DevOps pipeline. If it finds everything's perfect, as per our given guidelines, then it is allowing us to go ahead and start it, and we are able to deploy it.” - Arun D., Senior Architect at a healthcare company.

“Its flexibility is most valuable. It is such a flexible tool. It can be implemented in a number of ways. It can do anything you want it to do. It can be fully automated within a DevOps pipeline. It can also be used in an ad hoc, special test case scenario and anywhere in between.” - Tom H., Director of Security at Merito

OpenText

Kiuwan Insights supports the continuity and integrity of open source management with a complete multi-technology solution that seamlessly integrates with key SDLC tools.

With Kiuwan Insights, you can identify and manage:

vulnerabilities,

compliance, and

operational risk

that may arise from using open source components.

Open source components are a significant and important part of commercial software today. Yet the use of these components introduces the risk of security vulnerabilities, as well as a need to ensure proper licensing and adherence to policies.

Automation is an essential strategy for detection of open source components and security vulnerabilities, compliance analysis, and policy enforcement.

Kiuwan

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. Kiuwan Insights

March 2025

Free Report: Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. Kiuwan Insights

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. Kiuwan Insights and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. Kiuwan Insights report.

See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.