Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs Mend.io comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.3
Fortify Static Code Analyzer delivers cost savings by mitigating risks early, providing returns up to twenty times the investment.
Sentiment score
7.9
Mend.io enhances security and efficiency, managing open-source components, reducing vulnerabilities, boosting compliance, and increasing potential sales growth.
Mend.io has provided a good return on investment by significantly reducing vulnerabilities.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
Fortify Static Code Analyzer's customer service is praised for helpfulness but needs improvement in response times and efficiency.
Sentiment score
7.5
Mend.io provides highly responsive customer service with excellent technical support and proactive communication, despite minor reseller process challenges.
They prioritize providing the best experience to large organizations like ours, belonging to the Fortune 100.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Fortify Static Code Analyzer is scalable for large codebases, integrates with DevOps, and supports enterprise software with high satisfaction.
Sentiment score
7.8
Mend.io offers impressive scalability for large projects and users, with stable performance and effective integration with CI/CD tools.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Fortify Static Code Analyzer is stable with improved reliability; performance depends on hardware, network, and proper training adherence.
Sentiment score
7.7
Mend.io is generally stable and reliable, addressing occasional slowdowns swiftly, though some face pipeline integration challenges.
AI integration in code security tools like Mend.io is still in its early stages and relatively immature.
 

Room For Improvement

Fortify Static Code Analyzer needs improved language support, integration, configuration, user-friendliness, and prioritization to reduce costs and complexity.
Mend.io users desire enhanced integration, interface improvements, better scanning, customizable reports, and expanded support for tools and languages.
The organization decided to consolidate tools and chose Snyk since it provides multiple functionalities in one solution.
 

Setup Cost

Fortify Static Code Analyzer is costly but offers comprehensive enterprise features, with deployment based on developer count.
Mend.io provides cost-effective pricing with fixed developer fees, appealing to enterprises for affordability and negotiable terms.
The cost of Mend.io is competitive, being quite low compared to others.
 

Valuable Features

Fortify Static Code Analyzer enhances security with seamless integration, intuitive GUI, real-time feedback, and strong support for developers.
Mend.io streamlines governance and enhances security by efficiently detecting vulnerabilities and integrating with DevOps workflows.
We find it 100% accurate in detecting vulnerabilities.
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortify Static Code Analyzer
Ranking in Static Code Analysis
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Mend.io
Ranking in Static Code Analysis
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (17th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (7th), Software Supply Chain Security (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

Vishal Dhamke - PeerSpot reviewer
An expansive platform with comprehensive security rules and patterns to identify vulnerabilities
Setting up Fortify Static Application Security Testing (SAST) involves several steps to ensure that the tool is correctly configured and integrated into your development workflow, for example: installation, license activation, user access and permissions, integration with the development environment, project configuration, custom rules and policies, etc. The initial setup is very easy. I have used the enterprise version and a standalone version. The enterprise version definitely takes an ample amount of time to deploy because it needs to have a server, other logistics, and a proper RBAC in place. The enterprise version would take an ample amount of time, but the standard version is just a few clicks. A team of four to five people is required for the maintenance, and frequent updates are required to keep all the signatures up to date. I would rate the setup a nine out of ten.
meetharoon - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables smooth management of vulnerabilities and promotes a shift towards a culture of security
We have witnessed Mend.io for its high stability, consistently living up to our expectations in terms of performance and reliability. Our developers have reported very few issues and almost minimal to zero downtime, which is a critical factor for our organization to rely on Mend SCA to secure our applications. We didn't experience any major issues in the stability of the product. This level of dependability is crucial for our hundreds of development teams that need to maintain continuous integration and deployment processes without interruptions. We realize the solution's architecture is designed to support a wide range of use cases, making it suitable for organizations of varying sizes and complexities. As a SaaS (Software as a Service) offering, Mend.io eliminates the need for physical server management, which further contributes to its stability. Users can access the platform without worrying about hardware failures or maintenance issues that can affect on-premises solutions. Moreover, Mend.io's integration capabilities with existing workflows—including IDEs, repositories, and CI/CD pipelines—enhance its stability by providing a seamless user experience. This integration allows teams to incorporate security scanning into their development processes without significant disruptions, which is often a challenge with less stable solutions. Feedback from our developers and architects highlights the tool's effectiveness in reducing open-source software vulnerabilities while maintaining a streamlined development lifecycle. Our organization have experienced improved code quality and faster incident response times as a result of using Mend.io. The platform's intuitive dashboard and management views are also praised by our developers for their usability, contributing to a positive user experience. In short, Mend.io stands out as a dependable and reliable solution in the realm of software composition analysis. Its high stability, combined with robust integration capabilities and user-friendly features, makes it an excellent choice for organizations seeking to enhance their security posture while minimizing operational disruptions.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
30%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortify Static Code Analyzer?
Integrating the Fortify Static Code Analyzer into our software development lifecycle was straightforward. It highlights important information beyond just syntax errors. It identifies issues like pa...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify Static Code Analyzer?
I rate the pricing of Fortify Static Code Analyzer as a seven out of ten since it is a bit expensive.
What needs improvement with Fortify Static Code Analyzer?
False positives need improvement in the future. Fortify's vulnerability remediation guidance helps improve code security, but I think they need to improve the focus of the solution, as it still Con...
How does WhiteSource compare with SonarQube?
Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, ea...
How does WhiteSource compare with Black Duck?
We researched Black Duck but ultimately chose WhiteSource when looking for an application security tool. WhiteSource is a software solution that enables agile open source security and license compl...
What do you like most about Mend.io?
The best feature is that the Mend R&D team does their due diligence for all the vulnerabilities. In case they observe any important or critical vulnerabilities, such as the Log4j-related vulner...
 

Also Known As

Fortify Static Code Analysis SAST
WhiteSource, Mend SCA, Mend.io Supply Chain Defender, Mend SAST
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Microsoft, Autodesk, NCR, Target, IBM, vodafone, Siemens, GE digital, KPMG, LivePerson, Jack Henry and Associates
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs. Mend.io and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.