Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs ReShaper comparison

OpenText and JetBrains are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2, while JetBrains is ranked #6. OpenText holds a 11.4% mindshare in SCAS, compared to JetBrains’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.
OpenText Static Application...
Read 19 OpenText Static Application Security Testing reviews
  • 6,566 Views
  • 1,642 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
ReShaper
Read 2 ReShaper reviews
  • 571 Views
  • 571 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

OpenText Static Application Security Testing and ReShaper are competing solutions in software development tools. ReShaper appears to have superior features, justifying its cost despite OpenText's more favorable pricing and support.

Features: OpenText Static Application Security Testing focuses on comprehensive security analysis, integration capabilities, and protection with compliance. ReShaper provides advanced code refactoring, navigation, and real-time code inspection, enhancing development efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText has a straightforward deployment model with robust support channels for easy setup. ReShaper offers a flexible deployment model with responsive support for quick troubleshooting and assistance.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Static Application Security Testing has lower setup costs, offering a compelling ROI through security-focused features. ReShaper requires a higher initial investment but delivers substantial ROI by increasing developer productivity. The efficiency gains with ReShaper may justify the cost in development-centric environments.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. ReShaper Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. ReShaper
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Static Application...
Ranking in Static Code Analysis
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ReShaper
Ranking in Static Code Analysis
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of OpenText Static Application Security Testing is 11.4%, up from 10.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReShaper is 2.6%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Code Analysis
 

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides extensive language support and enhances secure coding practices
The deployment of Fortify Static Code Analyzer needs to be simplified. It should be easier to install, perhaps through a container-based approach where everything is combined into one image or pack of containers. This change would facilitate easier installations and ensure all necessary components are connected and ready to use.
Read full review
reviewer1465254 - PeerSpot reviewer
Detects, analyzes, and fixes any coding issues
When it's integrated with a weak server machine, the performance isn't that great. It starts up slowly and even crashes at times. If they optimized some of the modules within the ReSharper extension, it would be smoother and faster. Sometimes when the machine is a bit overloaded, it causes it to crash and you need to disable the extension and then re-enabled it. It's not really a stability issue, it probably depends on the machine, but they should consider the fact that not all people have strong machines with high hardware specifications. As long as you have a good processor it will work smoothly, but regarding minimum requirements, it needs to be revisited.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Fortify integrates with various development environments and tools, such as IDEs (Integrated Development Environments) and CI/CD pipelines."
"Fortify Static Code Analyzer's most valuable features are its ability to provide best practices for fixing code and its examples and capabilities to address security problems in the code. It effectively identifies security vulnerabilities by analyzing the code and offering insights on improving it."
"Automating the Jenkins plugins and the build title is a big plus."
"I like Fortify Software Security Center or Fortify SSC. This tool is installed on each developer's machine, but Fortify Software Security Center combines everything. We can meet there as security professionals and developers. The developers scan their code and publish the results there. We can then look at them from a security perspective and see whether they fixed the issues. We can agree on whether something is a false positive and make decisions."
"The reference provided for each issue is extremely helpful."
"It's helped us free up staff time."
"I like the Fortify taxonomy as it provides us with a list of all of the vulnerabilities found. Fortify release updated rule packs quarterly, with accompanying documentation, that lets us know what new features are being released."
"We've found the documentation to be very good."
More OpenText Static Application Security Testing pros
"The most valuable feature of ReShaper is that it provides continuously scanning of the data in real-time. ReShaper has a really good mechanism and process, they have a decent system."
"It comes with many features and supports almost all of the coding languages available."
 

Cons

"The generation of false positives should be reduced."
"The troubleshooting capabilities of this solution could be improved. This would reduce the number of cases that users have to submit."
"I'm not sure if Fortify Static Code Analyzer has AI capabilities. Currently, this solution doesn't quite have what we need."
"Their licensing is expensive."
"The pricing is a bit high."
"Streamlining the upgrade process and enhancing compatibility would make it easier for us to keep our security tools up-to-date."
"The product shows false positives for Python applications."
"The deployment of Fortify Static Code Analyzer needs to be simplified."
More OpenText Static Application Security Testing cons
"ReShaper could improve by increasing the performance of the scans. Their application is taking too much CPU. The processing is taking too many CPU resources which causes the system to slow down."
"When it's integrated with a weak server machine, the performance isn't that great. It starts up slowly and even crashes at times."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has a couple of license models. The one that we use most frequently is called their flexible deployment. We use this one because it is flexible and based on the number of code-contributing developers in the organization. It includes almost everything in the Fortify suite for one developer price. It gives access to not just the secure code analyzer (SCA) but also to FSC, the secure code. It gives us accessibility to scan central, which is the decentralized scanning farm. It also gives us access to the software security center, which is the vulnerability management platform."
"Although I am not responsible for the budget, Fortify SAST is expensive."
"The price of Fortify Static Code Analyzer could be reduced."
"I rate the pricing of Fortify Static Code Analyzer as a seven out of ten since it is a bit expensive."
"The setup costs and pricing for Fortify may vary depending on the organization's needs and requirements."
"There is a licensing fee, and if you bring them to the company and you want them to do the installation and the implementation in the beginning, there is a separate cost. Similarly, if you want consultation or training, there is a separate cost. I see it as suitable only for enterprises. I do not see it suitable for a small business or individual use."
"From our standpoint, we are significantly better off with Fortify due to the favorable pricing we secured five years ago."
"The licensing is expensive and is in the 50K range."
"As far as I know, the licensing isn't very cheap."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
29%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortify Static Code Analyzer?
Integrating the Fortify Static Code Analyzer into our software development lifecycle was straightforward. It highlights important information beyond just syntax errors. It identifies issues like pa...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify Static Code Analyzer?
My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing has been good. We have the scan machines, and we are planning to request more from Micro Focus now. We have calls every month or every oth...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Fortify Static Code Analyzer?
I think Fortify Static Code Analyzer could be improved by updating the number of rule packs according to the latest vulnerabilities we find each year. We have updated to a version that is one less ...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Black Duck vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing Logo
Black Duck vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Compared 33% of the time
Snyk vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing Logo
Snyk vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Compared 17% of the time
Veracode vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing Logo
Veracode vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Compared 13% of the time
Sonatype Lifecycle vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing Logo
Sonatype Lifecycle vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Compared 7% of the time
GitLab vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing Logo
GitLab vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Compared 7% of the time
More OpenText Static Application Security Testing Competitors
Whole Tomato Visual Assist vs ReShaper Logo
Whole Tomato Visual Assist vs ReShaper
Compared 100% of the time
More ReShaper Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
June 2025
OpenText Static Application Security Testing reportDownload OpenText Static Application Security Testing product report
Buyer's Guide
Static Code Analysis
July 2025
ReShaper reportDownload ReShaper product report
 

Also Known As

Fortify Static Code Analysis SAST
No data available
 

Overview

OpenText Static Application Security Testing empowers teams with efficient vulnerability detection and streamlined secure coding practices, offering comprehensive language support and seamless integration with development tools.

OpenText Static Application Security Testing enhances software security during development by accurately identifying vulnerabilities with minimal false positives. It integrates seamlessly with IDEs and CI/CD pipelines, making it highly efficient for early detection of security issues. Users benefit from its easy setup, clear documentation, and centralized portal for managing security findings. Despite facing challenges like high costs and complex configurations for certain languages, its role in facilitating compliance and streamlining secure coding processes is indispensable. Improvements are needed in areas such as outdated design, language support, and integration capabilities to meet evolving user expectations.

What features does OpenText Static Application Security Testing offer?
  • Seamless IDE Integration: Integrates effortlessly with development environments for real-time feedback.
  • Comprehensive Language Support: Covers a wide range of programming languages, enhancing detection accuracy.
  • Centralized Security Portal: Provides a streamlined interface for managing vulnerabilities.
What benefits and ROI should users consider?
  • Enhanced Security: Identifies vulnerabilities early, preventing potential breaches.
  • Time Efficiency: Automates processes and speeds up remediation efforts.
  • Compliance Facilitation: Assists in adhering to security standards and regulations.

Organizations across diverse sectors implement OpenText Static Application Security Testing primarily to secure applications during development phases. Its integration with tools like GitLab, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps ensures a robust security pipeline. By combining with Sonatype Nexus, secure code, and library management is achieved effectively.

OpenText

ReSharper extends Visual Studio with over 2200 on-the-fly code inspections for C#, VB.NET, ASP.NET, JavaScript, TypeScript and other technologies. For most inspections, ReSharper provides quick-fixes (light bulbs) to improve the code.

JetBrains
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. ReShaper
June 2025
Free Report: OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. ReShaper
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. ReShaper and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. ReShaper report.
See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.