Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs Semgrep comparison

OpenText and Semgrep are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. OpenText is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2, while Semgrep is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 24.1% mindshare in SCAS, compared to Semgrep’s 10.0% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Semgrep users who would recommend it.

Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Read 16 Fortify Static Code Analyzer reviews

1,884 Views
1,302 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Semgrep

Read 1 Semgrep review

349 Views
320 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Semgrep

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortify Static Code Analyzer and Semgrep based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, OpenText and others in Static Code Analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed Static Code Analysis Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Static Code Analysis

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Semgrep

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (29th), Supply Chain Management Software (3rd), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of Fortify Static Code Analyzer is 24.1%, up from 19.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Semgrep is 10.0%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis

Featured Reviews

Vishal Dhamke

Vice President Application Security North America at BNP Paribas

An expansive platform with comprehensive security rules and patterns to identify vulnerabilities

Setting up Fortify Static Application Security Testing (SAST) involves several steps to ensure that the tool is correctly configured and integrated into your development workflow, for example: installation, license activation, user access and permissions, integration with the development environment, project configuration, custom rules and policies, etc. The initial setup is very easy. I have used the enterprise version and a standalone version. The enterprise version definitely takes an ample amount of time to deploy because it needs to have a server, other logistics, and a proper RBAC in place. The enterprise version would take an ample amount of time, but the standard version is just a few clicks. A team of four to five people is required for the maintenance, and frequent updates are required to keep all the signatures up to date. I would rate the setup a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Henry Mwawai

Security Consultant | Application Security at Jowatechs

Automated code reviews and good scalability with custom rule adaptability

We use Semgrep to check custom user pipelines and test their claims for any vulnerabilities. We process the code by passing it through the testing process for any operability issues before sending feedback to the developers and providing the final product. This is part of the static testing…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration Subset core integration, using Jenkins is one of the good features."

"The most valuable features include its ability to detect vulnerabilities accurately and its integration with our CI/CD pipeline."

"We write software, and therefore, the most valuable aspect for us is basically the code analysis part."

"The reference provided for each issue is extremely helpful."

"We've found the documentation to be very good."

"I like the Fortify taxonomy as it provides us with a list of all of the vulnerabilities found. Fortify release updated rule packs quarterly, with accompanying documentation, that lets us know what new features are being released."

"Fortify Static Code Analyzer tells us if there are any security leaks or not. If there are, then it's notifying us and does not allow us to pass the DevOps pipeline. If it is finds everything's perfect, as per our given guidelines, then it is allowing us to go ahead and start it, and we are able to deploy it."

"Integrating the Fortify Static Code Analyzer into our software development lifecycle was straightforward. It highlights important information beyond just syntax errors. It identifies issues like password credentials and access keys embedded in the code."

More Fortify Static Code Analyzer pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to write our custom rules."

Cons

"Streamlining the upgrade process and enhancing compatibility would make it easier for us to keep our security tools up-to-date."

"Fortify Static Code Analyzer is a good solution, but sometimes we receive false positives. If they could reduce the number of false positives it would be good."

"The generation of false positives should be reduced."

"The pricing is a bit high."

"Fortify Static Code Analyzer has a bit of a learning curve, and I don't find it particularly helpful in narrowing down the vulnerabilities we should prioritize."

"I know the areas that they are trying to improve on. They've been getting feedback for several years. There are two main points. The first thing is keeping current with static code languages. I know it is difficult because code languages pop up all the time or there are new variants, but it is something that Fortify needs to put a better focus on. They need to keep current with their language support. The second thing is a philosophical issue, and I don't know if they'll ever change it. They've done a decent job of putting tools in place to mitigate things, but static code analysis is inherently noisy. If you just take a tool out of the box and run a scan, you're going to get a lot of results back, and not all of those results are interesting or important, which is different for every organization. Currently, we get four to five errors on the side of tagging, and it notifies you of every tiny inconsistency. If the tool sees something that it doesn't know, it flags, which becomes work that has to be done afterward. Clients don't typically like it. There has got to be a way of prioritizing. There are a ton of filter options within Fortify, but the problem is that you've got to go through the crazy noisy scan once before you know which filters you need to put in place to get to the interesting stuff. I keep hearing from their product team that they're working on a way to do container or docker scanning. That's a huge market mover. A lot of people are interested in that right now, and it is relevant. That is definitely something that I'd love to see in the next version or two."

"It comes with a hefty licensing fee."

"The generation of false positives should be reduced."

More Fortify Static Code Analyzer cons

"There should be more information on how to acquire the system, catering to beginners in application security, to make it more user-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"From our standpoint, we are significantly better off with Fortify due to the favorable pricing we secured five years ago."

"There is a licensing fee, and if you bring them to the company and you want them to do the installation and the implementation in the beginning, there is a separate cost. Similarly, if you want consultation or training, there is a separate cost. I see it as suitable only for enterprises. I do not see it suitable for a small business or individual use."

"The licensing is expensive and is in the 50K range."

"I rate the pricing of Fortify Static Code Analyzer as a seven out of ten since it is a bit expensive."

"Although I am not responsible for the budget, Fortify SAST is expensive."

"It has a couple of license models. The one that we use most frequently is called their flexible deployment. We use this one because it is flexible and based on the number of code-contributing developers in the organization. It includes almost everything in the Fortify suite for one developer price. It gives access to not just the secure code analyzer (SCA) but also to FSC, the secure code. It gives us accessibility to scan central, which is the decentralized scanning farm. It also gives us access to the software security center, which is the vulnerability management platform."

"The price of Fortify Static Code Analyzer could be reduced."

"The setup costs and pricing for Fortify may vary depending on the organization's needs and requirements."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

Integrating the Fortify Static Code Analyzer into our software development lifecycle was straightforward. It highlights important information beyond just syntax errors. It identifies issues like pa...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

I rate the pricing of Fortify Static Code Analyzer as a seven out of ten since it is a bit expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

False positives need improvement in the future. Fortify's vulnerability remediation guidance helps improve code security, but I think they need to improve the focus of the solution, as it still Con...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Semgrep?

There should be more information on how to acquire the system, catering to beginners in application security, to make it more user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Semgrep?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Semgrep?

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Black Duck vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Compared 34% of the time

Snyk vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Compared 20% of the time

Veracode vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Compared 12% of the time

Sonatype Lifecycle vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Compared 9% of the time

FOSSA vs Fortify Static Code Analyzer

Compared 1% of the time

More Fortify Static Code Analyzer Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Semgrep

Compared 41% of the time

Veracode vs Semgrep

Compared 8% of the time

Black Duck vs Semgrep

Compared 8% of the time

Snyk vs Semgrep

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs Semgrep

Compared 6% of the time

More Semgrep Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Static Code Analyzer

December 2024

Download Fortify Static Code Analyzer product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

November 2024

Download Semgrep product report

Also Known As

Fortify Static Code Analysis SAST

Semgrep Code, Semgrep Supply Chain, Semgrep AppSec Platform

Learn More

OpenText

Semgrep

Overview

Fortify Static Code Analyzer (SCA) utilizes numerous algorithms in addition to a dynamic intelligence base of secure coding protocols to investigate an application’s source code for any potential risk of malicious or dangerous threats. Additionally, the solution will prioritize the most critical concerns and give direction on how users can repair those concerns. This solution researches each and every potential route that workflow and data can travel to discover and repair all possible vulnerabilities. Fortify SCA allows users to create safe and secure software quickly. Users are able to discover potential security gaps more quickly with precise outcomes and repair them immediately.

Fortify Static Code Analyzer Benefits

CI/CD pipeline security: Fortify SCA integrates well with third-party tools such as ALM Octane, Atlassian Bamboo, Azure DevOps, Eclipse, Jenkins, and Jira. It offers real-time scan results, immediate recommendations, and collaborative auditing, and finds threats faster. It also discovers and prioritizes weaknesses to reduce risk.
Cost-effective: Improves coding actions by training users as they work to better understand the relationship of static application security testing (SAST). Fortify SCA is able to find more vulnerabilities than other solutions and delivers significantly fewer false positives.
Quick and reliable scanning: Fortify SCA will discover and eradicate weaknesses in byte, binary, or source code. SAST is able to stop the bulk of code issues at the start of development. The solution is able to discover 815 specific categories of risk, works through 27 programming languages and more than one million different APIs. Fortify SCA has a positive rate of 100% in the OWASP 1.2 benchmark.

Fortify Static Code Analyzer Features

Flexible deployment: Using Fortify On Demand, users can work in a complete SaaS environment. Fortify Hosted allows users to use on-premises and SaaS to work in a secure virtual space with complete control. Fortify-On-Prem gives users absolute control of the Fortify SCA solution.
Security assistant: Users have an interactive guide as they create code that provides risk analysis and anticipated outcomes. Security Assistant is an outstanding immediate feedback tool that gives instant results with significantly fewer false positives.
Audit assistant: This feature uses machine learning to reduce manual audit time while prioritizing the most important risks to users' networks. It provides automated audits in minutes. Any manual examinations are reduced, all issues are prioritized in accordance with organizational needs, and Fortify SCA consistently provides audit results to all projects.

Results from Real Users

“Fortify Static Code Analyzer tells us if there are any security leaks or not. If there are, then it's notifying us and does not allow us to pass the DevOps pipeline. If it finds everything's perfect, as per our given guidelines, then it is allowing us to go ahead and start it, and we are able to deploy it.” - Arun D., Senior Architect at a healthcare company.

“Its flexibility is most valuable. It is such a flexible tool. It can be implemented in a number of ways. It can do anything you want it to do. It can be fully automated within a DevOps pipeline. It can also be used in an ad hoc, special test case scenario and anywhere in between.” - Tom H., Director of Security at Merito

Semgrep is a tool for identifying vulnerabilities in code and ensuring code quality through static analysis. It is known for its efficiency, customizable rules, and seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines.

Semgrep aids developers in maintaining secure codebases by automating security checks and reducing manual code reviews. It is particularly valued for enforcing coding standards and discovering common security flaws early in the development process. Its ability to handle multiple languages and customizable rules, along with its open-source nature and active community support, make it a popular choice among developers. However, users have suggested that documentation could be more comprehensive, configuration more intuitive, and performance more optimized to better serve both new and experienced users.

What features does Semgrep offer?

Speed in Identifying Code Issues: Fast detection of vulnerabilities and code quality issues.
Multi-Language Support: Ability to handle multiple programming languages.
Customizable Rules: Users can craft custom checks to suit specific needs.
CI/CD Integration: Seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines for automated security checks.
Precise Results: Delivering accurate results with minimal false positives.
Open-Source Nature: Active community support and transparency.

What benefits should users look for?

Enhanced Code Security: Automating the detection of vulnerabilities early in the development process.
Efficiency in Code Reviews: Reducing the need for extensive manual code reviews.
Customizable Checks: Tailored security checks for specific project requirements.
Community and Support: Benefit from an active and responsive community.
CI/CD Compatibility: Streamlined integration with existing workflows.

Semgrep is implemented across various industries for its effectiveness in maintaining secure codebases and automating security checks. In sectors like finance, technology, and healthcare, where code security is paramount, developers rely on Semgrep to enforce coding standards, reduce vulnerabilities, and comply with regulatory requirements. Its ability to handle diverse programming languages makes it versatile and suitable for different types of projects, from small startups to large enterprises.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Policygenius, Tide, Lyft, Thinkific, FloQast, Vanta, and Fareportal

Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, OpenText and others in Static Code Analysis. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.