OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition comparison

OpenText and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category. OpenText is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while PortSwigger is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.6. OpenText holds a 11.0% mindshare in DAST, compared to PortSwigger’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Read 22 OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reviews

3,095 Views
1,145 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Ente...

Read 12 PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition reviews

2,151 Views
430 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

PortSwigger Burp Suite Ente...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition compete in application security testing. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise holds the upper hand for its expansive feature set, making it a preferred choice despite its higher price point.

Features: OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing provides comprehensive scanning, integration with development tools, and scalability suitable for large enterprises. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise offers an in-depth scanning process, a wide range of security testing features, and CI/CD integration, catering to security professionals.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its feature set to compete with PortSwigger. Improvements in advanced integrations and extended scanning capabilities could add value. Better user interface aspects and more comprehensive reporting options are also potential enhancements. PortSwigger could improve setup processes to reduce challenges during deployment. Additional user-friendly interfaces and enhanced initial configuration settings would benefit users. Streamlining integration processes and addressing specific user needs could further enhance its offering.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ensures smooth deployment with intuitive integration and responsive customer service. PortSwigger simplifies deployment significantly, coupled with proactive customer engagement, though initial setup challenges exist, highlighting areas for initial process improvements.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText offers competitive pricing, ensuring a relatively quick ROI, particularly for larger deployments. PortSwigger, positioned at a higher price, justifies the investment through long-term benefits from its extensive capabilities, offering enhanced value over time despite an initially higher cost.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,360 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

3rd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

DevSecOps (9th)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Ente...

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the mindshare of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is 11.0%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is 4.3%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing	11.0%
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition	4.3%
Other	84.7%

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Featured Reviews

ArnabPaul

Cyber Security Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Enhancements in manual testing align with reporting and integration features

WebInspect works efficiently with Java-based or .NET based applications. However, it struggles with Salesforce applications, where it requires approximately 20-24 hours to crawl and audit but produces minimal findings, necessitating manual verification. The solution offers customization features for crawling and vulnerability detection. It includes various security frameworks and allows selection of specific vulnerability types to audit, such as OWASP Top 10 or JavaScript-based vulnerabilities. When working with APIs, we can select OWASP API Top 10. The tool also supports custom audit features by combining different security frameworks. For on-premises deployment, the setup is complex, particularly regarding SQL server configuration. Unlike Burp Suite or OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing, which have simpler setup processes, WebInspect requires SQL server setup to function.

Read full review

Oussama Ben Taher

Studiant at Edifixio

Enables time-saving automated scanning and brute force attacks

The most appreciated functionality of PortSwigger Burp Suite is its ability to perform brute force attacks automatically. Its automated scanning feature saves time. Additionally, using this tool provides significant security insights, making our testing process more efficient and comprehensive, leading to considerable time savings, which in turn translates to financial benefits.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the static analysis."

"The transaction recorder within WebInspect is easy to use, which is valuable for our team."

"The feature that has been most influential in identifying vulnerabilities is its ability to crawl the website, understand the structure, and analyze the network packets sent and received."

"Technical support has been good."

"Guided Scan option allows us to easily scan and share reports."

"Good at scanning and finding vulnerabilities."

"The tool provides comprehensive vulnerability assessments which help ensure our deliverables are as free from vulnerabilities as possible. It has also streamlined our web application vulnerability assessments, assisting us in delivering secure applications to our clients."

"There are lots of small settings and tools, like an HTTP editor, that are very useful."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing pros

"The solution's extensions really expand the capabilities and features offered by the installation."

"Parallel scans can be done with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition."

"We are in the early stage of using the solution making it difficult to fully determine the best features. However, we have noticed the CMDB and device discovery features look valuable at this time."

"This tool helps identify vulnerabilities. We then provide the report to the developers, who address the issues identified automatically. Its most valuable feature is CI/CD integration."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The tool is loaded with many features that give us ROI."

"Its automated scanning feature saves time."

"The product's initial setup phase was super easy."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition pros

Cons

"The scanner could be better."

"I would like WebInspect's scanning capability to be quicker."

"The initial setup was complex."

"It took us between eight and ten hours to scan an entire site, which is somewhat slow and something that I think can be improved."

"Not sufficiently compatible with some of our systems."

"There are some file extensions, like .SER, that Fortify WebInspect doesn't scan."

"The installation could be a bit easier. Usually it's simple to use, but the installation is painful and a bit laborious and complex."

"We have often encountered scanning errors."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing cons

"The cost per license per user could be cheaper, specifically for individual licensing."

"It would be better if the solution is cloud-based."

"The solution is a bit expensive."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition should incorporate a static code analysis feature. One main issue we encounter is false positives. False positives can be challenging for developers."

"From my personal experience, the solution's performance could be improved."

"There's definitely room for improvement. There are lots of false positives. Once I do the manual assessment, it comes as a false positive. They need to improve the Enterprise Edition, especially the part that gives false positives."

"Scalability could be better."

"There are features or functionality missing, but PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition does try to update frequently to alleviate the shortcomings."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It’s a fair price for the solution."

"Its price is almost similar to the price of AppScan. Both of them are very costly. Its price could be reduced because it can be very costly for unlimited IT scans, etc. I'm not sure, but it can go up to $40,000 to $50,000 or more than that."

"Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."

"Fortify WebInspect is a very expensive product."

"The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand."

"The price is okay."

"This solution is very expensive."

"Although the solution can be a bit expensive for small companies, its pricing is fairly reasonable for its capabilities."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is neither a cheap nor an expensive product. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is a good tool for companies."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable and costs around 400 dollars per year."

"For Professional, it's about $400 per year."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is expensive compared to other solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify WebInspect?

While I am not directly involved with licensing, I can share that our project's license for 1-9 applications costs between $15,000 to $19,000. In comparison, Burp Suite costs approximately $500 to ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify WebInspect?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortify WebInspect?

I am currently working with several tools. For Fortify, I use SCA and WebInspect. Apart from that, I use Burp Suite from PortSwigger. For API testing, I use Postman with Burp Suite or WebInspect fo...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition?

Parallel scans can be done with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition?

I am using the Community Edition, which is free, however, I understand there might be extra expenses for additional features or services.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition?

It would be beneficial if Burp Suite provided predefined payloads for each attack category, such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting, to automate some tasks more effectively.

See all answers

Comparisons

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 20% of the time

Checkmarx One vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 7% of the time

OWASP Zap vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 6% of the time

Veracode vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 5% of the time

Acunetix vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Competitors

Seal Security vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 38% of the time

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 10% of the time

Rapid7 Metasploit vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 6% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 6% of the time

JFrog Xray vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 4% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

January 2026

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing report

Download OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

January 2026

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect

No data available

Overview

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.

This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.

What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?

Scalability: Easily adapts to changing enterprise needs.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface with guided scans.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed vulnerability analysis and reporting.
Integration Capabilities: Works with Fortify code scanner and user authentication scanning.
Wide Vulnerability Detection: Identifies extensive security vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect from reviews?

Efficient Vulnerability Management: Streamlines security management in development environments.
Detailed Analysis: Provides in-depth insights into security issues.
Quick Setup: Easy to deploy within existing systems.
Enterprise Preference: Supports enterprise environments efficiently.

In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.

OpenText

Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is an automated web vulnerability scanner, designed to enable enterprises to scale security across their web portfolios and achieve DevSecOps. Automate trusted Burp scans, integrate web security testing with development, and free your application security to support software development.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

Aaron's

Nasa, Disney, Dow Jones, Iberia Bank, IBM, Ernest and Young, Apple, Ryanair, Thyssenkrupp, Delivery Hero

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition report.

See our list of best Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) vendors.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.