Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

FreeNAS vs StarWind Storage Appliance comparison

FreeNAS and StarWind are both solutions in the NAS category. FreeNAS is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0, while StarWind is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.5. FreeNAS holds a 2.9% mindshare in N, compared to StarWind’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of FreeNAS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of StarWind users who would recommend it.
FreeNAS
Read 9 FreeNAS reviews
  • 831 Views
  • 587 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
StarWind Storage Appliance
Read 10 StarWind Storage Appliance reviews
  • 246 Views
  • 199 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

FreeNAS and StarWind Storage Appliance compete in the network-attached storage market. StarWind Storage Appliance appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and professional support.

Features: FreeNAS is open-source, offers ease of use through a web interface, and provides flexibility in managing storage. It is known for container integration, dynamic disk management, and simple task synchronization. StarWind Storage Appliance features high availability, automated storage tiering, and hyper-convergence. It offers instant failover redundancy, iSCSI support, and proactive expert support.

Room for Improvement: FreeNAS could benefit from more comprehensive professional support, enhanced enterprise features, and reduced complexity for enterprise-level functionality. StarWind Storage Appliance may improve by offering more budget-friendly options, refining its setup process for less technical users, and enhancing community-driven support options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FreeNAS offers straightforward deployment and robust community resources, making it suitable for tech enthusiasts. StarWind Storage Appliance provides professional deployment options and dedicated customer support, ensuring smooth integration and minimal downtime for businesses.

Pricing and ROI: FreeNAS has low initial setup costs and is ideal for small teams or personal use, providing excellent ROI. StarWind Storage Appliance, with higher upfront costs, delivers strong ROI for businesses focused on performance and scalability due to its extensive feature set and professional support.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed FreeNAS vs. StarWind Storage Appliance Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
FreeNAS vs. StarWind Storage Appliance
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FreeNAS
Ranking in NAS
11th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
StarWind Storage Appliance
Ranking in NAS
14th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
All-Flash Storage (29th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the NAS category, the mindshare of FreeNAS is 2.9%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StarWind Storage Appliance is 1.0%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
NAS
 

Featured Reviews

Vincenzo D'Aniello - PeerSpot reviewer
Open-source with great disk management and task synchronization
The system itself allows you to add any feature. The only bad thing is that this maybe depends on FreeBSD, and sometimes finding documentation is difficult. For example, we knew that previous versions automatically enabled the Linux kernel, yet with the recent version, this was no longer the case. Now, there was the possibility of being able to create Debian-based jails, and finding the documentation was not easy or fast. That said, in the end, we succeeded. If you find the documentation, it is always incomplete and fragmented.
Read full review
Kishore CA - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers stable performance even with a single node failure and manages everything with just two nodes.
The only drawback is that it takes a bit of time during initial synchronization, especially after restarting the environment. This is a potential area of improvement. There's a synchronization time, but it takes time. Initially, when we start the first environment deployment, it starts synchronizing between the storage. So, it is taking time. One thing is that even when you restart. Let's assume that the synchronization is completed and the storage is synchronized. Both storages are fully synchronized, and it is in sync mode. Now, if we want to restart both nodes, there is a case for maintenance purposes. You took both nodes for maintenance, and we rebooted it. Then, it should not synchronize again. It should be a checksum. And if there is a checksum match, there should be no synchronization again. So, one thing that should be taken care of. Another thing is that I used freeware- the community version, free license, which we deployed using PowerShare. In that case, it was very difficult to bring back another node when one node was faulty. Let's assume that both the nodes are working fine. And we found one node faulty. And we destroyed all the volumes in that and tried to bring it back. So that was a difficult factor. The final solution is that we were not able to bring back the failed node. So, we reconstructed a new data source for that. That is another drawback. In future releases, I would like to see the integration with VMware or some other things as a plugin model for VMware.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It integrates well into either Windows or Linux environments."
"What I like about it is that I can work on it from any computer or any device. The initial setup is very simple. The setup wizard is really helpful."
"It has the best storage capacity."
"FreeNAS is much simpler and easier to use than other solutions, but we don't have the complete range of features that come with the full version."
"The solution has been very stable so far."
"The ease of use of the 'jail', the management of backups, and copies to easily create test and pre-production scenarios have speeded up the development and distribution of business apps."
"Its stability is the most valuable. It is reliable, and we don't have to worry too much about it."
"The management interface is the most valuable feature for us."
"The integration is excellent."
"We are able to easily back up our data and send it to an offsite location."
"Having instant failover redundancy helps me sleep easier at night."
"StarWind Storage Appliance is simpler and more effective than using Microsoft products. We chose it because it can be easily integrated with Microsoft."
"Its user-friendly interface makes it an attractive option, especially for customers who may not be highly tech-savvy."
"It is very easy to use and very cost effective."
"They call us when monitoring shows a possible issue and are very flexible in working with our schedule to troubleshoot when it is convenient for us."
More StarWind Storage Appliance pros
 

Cons

"The support for S3 needs to be improved."
"They can improve the integration with PSA systems. This functionality could be better."
"The latest version of the dashboard doesn't work as good as the previous version."
"If you find the documentation, it is always incomplete and fragmented."
"FreeNAS should be better prepared for clustering."
"They should include clustering for the solution."
"The one thing that I find difficult to do which is very time-consuming is that I like to have a backup of the important files."
"With StarWind Storage Appliance, it would be better to have an overall easier setup with a little bit of configuration changes since, currently, even a small mistake may cause the setup process to go wrong."
"An improvement would be if they reached out to education customers with other available products."
"They could improve by providing integration with HP."
"The dashboard features are not in the free version."
"StarWind Storage Appliance's demo version should be similar to the paid one."
"StarWind no longer sells HDDs for primary storage."
"StarWind should improve the synchronization time of its product. There should be a standard operating procedure (SOP) for synchronization to reduce the time it takes."
"Other solutions, such as StorMagic, offer more flexibility in terms of handling caching and moving data between additional nodes."
More StarWind Storage Appliance cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For our configuration, we pay a little bit less than €10,000 ($12,000 USD) per year."
"Its licensing cost is based on the hardware capacity."
"Its price is okay. It suits our needs."
"We use the free version of the program."
"We found that the price of StarWind was very good compared to VMware or Nutanix."
"I rate StarWind Storage Appliance's pricing an eight out of ten."
"StarWind by far provides the best bang for the buck."
"The cost is determined by various factors, including the amount of terabyte storage you require, the number of nodes you want to purchase, and the duration of your maintenance agreement"
"On the homepage, you can not see the pricing."
"It costs about 50,000 euros."
"With StarWind Storage Appliance, the payments made towards the licensing part of the product are on a per-node basis, making it cost-effective for us to use the solution in our company."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Government
9%
Educational Organization
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
24%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Government
15%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FreeNAS?
The ease of use of the 'jail', the management of backups, and copies to easily create test and pre-production scenarios have speeded up the development and distribution of business apps.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FreeNAS?
The core version is free and open-source.
See all answers
What needs improvement with FreeNAS?
The system itself allows you to add any feature. The only bad thing is that this maybe depends on FreeBSD, and sometimes finding documentation is difficult. For example, we knew that previous versi...
See all answers
What do you like most about StarWind Storage Appliance?
I would say data protection and easy management are the most valuable features of the product...I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StarWind Storage Appliance?
I rate StarWind Storage Appliance's pricing an eight out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with StarWind Storage Appliance?
StarWind Storage Appliance's demo version should be similar to the paid one.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Qumulo vs FreeNAS Logo
Qumulo vs FreeNAS
Compared 21% of the time
Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs FreeNAS Logo
Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs FreeNAS
Compared 19% of the time
NetApp FAS Series vs FreeNAS Logo
NetApp FAS Series vs FreeNAS
Compared 14% of the time
HPE StoreEasy vs FreeNAS Logo
HPE StoreEasy vs FreeNAS
Compared 14% of the time
More FreeNAS Competitors
DataCore SANsymphony vs StarWind Storage Appliance Logo
DataCore SANsymphony vs StarWind Storage Appliance
Compared 21% of the time
StorMagic SvSAN vs StarWind Storage Appliance Logo
StorMagic SvSAN vs StarWind Storage Appliance
Compared 20% of the time
More StarWind Storage Appliance Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
FreeNAS
January 2025
FreeNAS reportDownload FreeNAS product report
Buyer's Guide
StarWind Storage Appliance
December 2024
StarWind Storage Appliance reportDownload StarWind Storage Appliance product report
 

Learn More

FreeNAS
StarWind
 

Overview

FreeNAS is an operating system that can be installed on virtually any hardware platform to share data over a network. FreeNAS is the simplest way to create a centralized and easily accessible place for your data. Use FreeNAS with ZFS to protect, store, backup, all of your data. FreeNAS is used everywhere, for the home, small business, and the enterprise.

For SMB and Enterprises who are looking for high performance primary storage for server virtualization, VDI, database and Big Data scenarios, or inexpensive secondary backup tier, our solution is StarWind Storage Appliance. It unifies commodity servers, disks and flash, and associated software into an easily scalable storage platform.

Additionally, the appliance features an optional gateway to Azure public cloud, which helps to implement an effective Disaster Recovery plan or meet regulatory requirements. StarWind SA scales up by adding individual disks and flash modules, or JBODs, while adding ready controller nodes allows scaling out. 

StarWind SA targets those, who need high-performance primary storage or secondary storage for backup. In case there is a whole virtualization infrastructure to build from scratch, StarWind HCA will come in handy. Otherwise, if all the required hardware is present, StarWind Virtual SAN will be enough to build a high-performance virtualization setup. 

 

Sample Customers

Morroni Technologies Inc., Creative Integrations
Bosch, EC2 IT, Solid Earth Inc., Canon
Buyer's Guide
FreeNAS vs. StarWind Storage Appliance
January 2025
Free Report: FreeNAS vs. StarWind Storage Appliance
Find out what your peers are saying about FreeNAS vs. StarWind Storage Appliance and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our FreeNAS vs. StarWind Storage Appliance report.
See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.