Fudo PAM vs WALLIX Bastion comparison

Fudo Security and WALLIX are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Fudo Security is ranked #25, while WALLIX is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.8. Fudo Security holds a 2.6% mindshare in PAM, compared to WALLIX’s 9.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fudo Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of WALLIX users who would recommend it.

Fudo PAM

Read 5 Fudo PAM reviews

969 Views
586 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WALLIX Bastion

Read 10 WALLIX Bastion reviews

3,506 Views
2,353 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Fudo PAM

WALLIX Bastion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

WALLIX Bastion and Fudo PAM are leading solutions in the privileged access management sector. WALLIX Bastion stands out with its customer support, while Fudo PAM is noted for its features that justify its cost.

Features: WALLIX Bastion is renowned for its security aspects, ease of configuration, and effective access control. Fudo PAM shines with advanced session management, scalability, and detailed auditing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: WALLIX Bastion could enhance reporting features and streamline its integration process. Fudo PAM would benefit from a more intuitive interface and better module communication. Both have room for refinement based on user feedback.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WALLIX Bastion offers rapid deployment and responsive customer service. Fudo PAM also ensures reliable deployment with more initial setup needed. Customer support is strong for both, with WALLIX having quicker response times.

Pricing and ROI: WALLIX Bastion's competitive pricing and efficient setup lead to a faster ROI. Fudo PAM is costlier, but its features and long-term benefits make the investment worthwhile. WALLIX's pricing is seen as more advantageous in the short term, though Fudo's long-term ROI is significant.

To learn more, read our detailed Fudo PAM vs. WALLIX Bastion Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. WALLIX Bastion

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,854 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Fudo PAM

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WALLIX Bastion

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

11th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Fudo PAM is 2.6%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WALLIX Bastion is 9.7%, up from 8.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Oleksiy-Zaionchkovskyy

Security Solutions Architect at Netwave

May 27, 2024

Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization

I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server. Working with 100 or 200 server installations is comfortable, but not thousands. The scalability isn't very good because it's complicated. I would like more organization. For instance, they could add a table that matches an account to many servers at once. There could also be better education services. They don't have any certification program, at least in Ukraine, so the training is complicated and divided into different pieces. Cisco, for example, has a great education program that starts from the basics and progresses to advanced features.

Read full review

Herve Choupot

CyberSecurity Architect at Novacelis

Nov 11, 2024

Enhancing administration security with critical feature improvements needed

My primary use case is to make a training about Active Directory security. In my experience, I work with Bastion. I emphasize the importance of having a good knowledge of Bastion to avoid vulnerabilities It helps by providing some security features for administration, although it's crucial to be…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."

"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."

"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."

"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."

"Bastion provides a kind of isolation between the administration laptop and the server you want to administer."

"I like that it's Linux-based, and you don't need to have separate implementations, extra database licenses, or enterprise licenses. I think because it's Linux-based, it's more seamless than Windows. I also like the access manager, which I think is a super tool. Everything is browser-based, and you don't need a VPN. So, that's a great thing."

"The support is great. They offer 24/7 support, but the specific level of support depends on your subscription. There's a weekday-only option, and a 24/7 option that covers all days of the week. They also have offices in different regions, including West Africa, so people there can easily get support. There's no need to worry about getting assistance."

"The solution's technical support team is helpful."

"The interface is very simple. It doesn't need any plug-ins, just browsers that are installed at the beginning."

"WALLIX Bastion's most valuable feature is the Access Manager because you can use it and access the data center without any client VPN."

"We use WALLIX Bastion to provide access and to monitor sessions."

"Its video recording capabilities have definitely been key for us."

More WALLIX Bastion pros

Cons

"The stability is not very good."

"Professional training and certification would be great."

"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."

"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."

"The configuration is difficult."

"WALLIX Bastion is GUI-driven, but it sometimes needs some management."

"The performance of WALLIX Bastion's password manager is very low."

"The product doesn't have behavior analytics. They promised to develop this, but only for the cloud, not for on-premise versions."

"For me, the main issue has to do with the system performance itself."

"It would be better if I could manage multiple accounts in one place, like CyberArk. With WALLIX, you can only manage one account, and you are given a separate category. You have to click on each connection to do anything. For example, CyberArk might give three options for one connection if you want to have an interactive user-level experience. But with WALLIX, you have to click three times to get that access. Also, the biggest disadvantage of WALLIX is the reporting. I feel like it's very weak in reporting when compared to the other solutions. As a solution, they're good and stable. But they need to make their reports neater and better. Right now, we're going to the console and then pressing buttons every single time."

"Based on my experience as a sales tech person, one area of improvement could be a more unified licensing model."

"The password management needs improvement. Management of Access Manager should be improved as well."

"There should be more effort to increase the level of security."

More WALLIX Bastion cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."

"The solution's price is mid-ranged."

"Some extra price needs to be paid for license."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to that of other products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

13%

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fudo PAM?

Session recording and password management are the two main aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fudo PAM?

There are some areas for improvement in the Fudo PAM cake that we want to improve in terms of scaling. Scaling is an optional feature because we closed some big projects with enterprise customers f...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fudo PAM?

The main use case is for protecting privileged user access, such as securing remote access services. Another important use case is when we work with third-party users and need to provide password m...

See all answers

What do you like most about WALLIX Bastion?

The support is great. They offer 24/7 support, but the specific level of support depends on your subscription. There's a weekday-only option, and a 24/7 option that covers all days of the week. The...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WALLIX Bastion?

The solution's pricing is comparable to that of other products.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WALLIX Bastion?

The disadvantage is that they have to optimize it to use fewer resources. They have to go forward and add some technology to grow so fast. It needs to meet certain PQI solutions, including single s...

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Fudo PAM

Compared 23% of the time

Teleport vs Fudo PAM

Compared 17% of the time

One Identity Safeguard vs Fudo PAM

Compared 15% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Fudo PAM

Compared 14% of the time

ManageEngine PAM360 vs Fudo PAM

Compared 7% of the time

More Fudo PAM Competitors

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs WALLIX Bastion

Compared 32% of the time

Teleport vs WALLIX Bastion

Compared 14% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs WALLIX Bastion

Compared 10% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs WALLIX Bastion

Compared 9% of the time

ARCON Privileged Access Management vs WALLIX Bastion

Compared 4% of the time

More WALLIX Bastion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

November 2024

Download Fudo PAM product report

Buyer's Guide

WALLIX Bastion

October 2024

Download WALLIX Bastion product report

Also Known As

Fudo Privileged Access Management

Bastion

Learn More

Fudo Security

WALLIX

Overview

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

WALLIX offers cybersecurity and privileged access management solutions that secure and protect your most critical IT assets.

Sample Customers

KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL

RTBF, Pharmagest, Michelin Group, Niort Hospital

Buyer's Guide

Fudo PAM vs. WALLIX Bastion

October 2024

Free Report: Fudo PAM vs. WALLIX Bastion

Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. WALLIX Bastion and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fudo PAM vs. WALLIX Bastion report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.