Ixia BreakingPoint and GitGuardian Public Monitoring are network security solutions competing in monitoring and testing sectors. GitGuardian has an edge in proactive monitoring for open-source vulnerability management.
Features: Ixia BreakingPoint offers comprehensive real-world attack simulations, performance testing, and thorough network security assessments. GitGuardian Public Monitoring impresses with its precise monitoring of public repositories, detection of sensitive information, and protection against exposed credentials.
Room for Improvement: Ixia BreakingPoint could expand integration with modern DevOps tools, enhance user interface capabilities, and improve scalability options. GitGuardian Public Monitoring users suggest broader coverage beyond Git-based platforms, better data visualization tools, and enhanced alert management features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ixia BreakingPoint is noted for straightforward deployment but needs better customer support response. GitGuardian Public Monitoring facilitates a smooth setup, with a responsive support team making for superior customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Ixia BreakingPoint has a straightforward though costly pricing, delivering good ROI with extensive testing capabilities. GitGuardian Public Monitoring's competitive pricing and focus on protecting sensitive information grant strong ROI and perceived better value for money, especially in public code security.
GitGuardian Public Monitoring allows real-time GitHub scanning and alerting to uncover sensitive company information hiding in online repositories. It monitors both organization repositories and developers' personal repositories. The solution gives visibility to developers and security teams on this very critical blindspot that are the organization developers' personal repositories on GitHub (80% of leaked corporate secrets on public GitHub come from developers’ personal repositories).
GitGuardian Public Monitoring is particularly interesting for companies with large development teams (above 200 developers) and modern development practices.
GitGuardian Public Monitoring cover 350+ API providers, database connection strings, private keys, certificates, usernames and passwords and intellectual property. It uses sophisticated pattern matching techniques to detect credentials that cannot be strictly defined with a distinctive pattern (like unprefixed credentials). The algorithm has a high precision (91% “true positive” feedback following our alerts, as reported by our users.)
The alerting is done in real-time (a few seconds after the secret was publicly exposed) which allows fast remediation involving in a collaborative way developers, security teams and operations.
GitGuardian Public Monitoring also allows red teams and pentesters to proactively look for sensitive information by performing complex queries on 12 billion documents and metadata from more than 3 years of GitHub history.
GitGuardian Public Monitoring scans public GitHub activity in real-time, helping organizations detect sensitive information leaks in source code repositories. Our solution gives Threat Intelligence and Security teams full visibility over their organization’s public GitHub Attack Surface, by monitoring both organization-owned repositories and developers' personal repositories.
With 80% of secrets and credentials leaks on public GitHub finding their source in developers' personal repositories, GitGuardian for Public Monitoring helps organizations address a critical security blind spot.
With real-time incident notification, Threat Intelligence and Security teams are guaranteed to reach the incident scene before everyone else and take action to mitigate the threat of breaches and intrusions.
By simulating real-world legitimate traffic, distributed denial of service (DDoS), exploits, malware, and fuzzing, BreakingPoint validates an organization’s security infrastructure, reduces the risk of network degradation by almost 80%, and increases attack readiness by nearly 70%.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.