Spirent CyberFlood and GitGuardian Public Monitoring compete in distinct fields within cybersecurity. GitGuardian appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and functionality, alongside its real-time integration within DevOps workflows.
Features: Spirent CyberFlood offers detailed traffic simulation, flexible testing environments, and comprehensive security assessments. GitGuardian provides real-time scanning, repository monitoring, and seamless DevOps integration, making it ideal for securing software development processes.
Room for Improvement: Spirent CyberFlood could enhance user engagement, streamline its processes, and broaden integration capabilities. GitGuardian can improve by expanding integration options, refining alert management, and enhancing repository scanning features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spirent CyberFlood is known for its strong deployment options but presents a learning curve; however, its customer service is knowledgeable. GitGuardian Public Monitoring is easy to deploy with comprehensive support, facilitating a smoother implementation.
Pricing and ROI: Spirent CyberFlood's setup costs are substantial, yet justified by its powerful testing capabilities and high ROI. GitGuardian offers a cost-effective solution with pricing aligned to deliver rapid security benefits.
GitGuardian Public Monitoring allows real-time GitHub scanning and alerting to uncover sensitive company information hiding in online repositories. It monitors both organization repositories and developers' personal repositories. The solution gives visibility to developers and security teams on this very critical blindspot that are the organization developers' personal repositories on GitHub (80% of leaked corporate secrets on public GitHub come from developers’ personal repositories).
GitGuardian Public Monitoring is particularly interesting for companies with large development teams (above 200 developers) and modern development practices.
GitGuardian Public Monitoring cover 350+ API providers, database connection strings, private keys, certificates, usernames and passwords and intellectual property. It uses sophisticated pattern matching techniques to detect credentials that cannot be strictly defined with a distinctive pattern (like unprefixed credentials). The algorithm has a high precision (91% “true positive” feedback following our alerts, as reported by our users.)
The alerting is done in real-time (a few seconds after the secret was publicly exposed) which allows fast remediation involving in a collaborative way developers, security teams and operations.
GitGuardian Public Monitoring also allows red teams and pentesters to proactively look for sensitive information by performing complex queries on 12 billion documents and metadata from more than 3 years of GitHub history.
GitGuardian Public Monitoring scans public GitHub activity in real-time, helping organizations detect sensitive information leaks in source code repositories. Our solution gives Threat Intelligence and Security teams full visibility over their organization’s public GitHub Attack Surface, by monitoring both organization-owned repositories and developers' personal repositories.
With 80% of secrets and credentials leaks on public GitHub finding their source in developers' personal repositories, GitGuardian for Public Monitoring helps organizations address a critical security blind spot.
With real-time incident notification, Threat Intelligence and Security teams are guaranteed to reach the incident scene before everyone else and take action to mitigate the threat of breaches and intrusions.
Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.