Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google Search Appliance vs Luigi's Box comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Search Appliance
Ranking in Indexing and Search
13th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Luigi's Box
Ranking in Indexing and Search
2nd
Average Rating
9.8
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Indexing and Search category, the mindshare of Google Search Appliance is 0.6%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Luigi's Box is 0.1%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Indexing and Search
 

Featured Reviews

it_user1227 - PeerSpot reviewer
Fast and efficient enterprise search application with query support in 40 different languages
A very good enterprise search application. Search results are produced pretty fast and the contents gets re-index quite often which ensures that the search results are not stale. The Administrative Interface is very easy to use and has a lot of useful information. The number of pages crawled by google search appliance is quite high compared other tools in the same domain. Another good feature of Google search appliance is that, the search index keeps getting updated for every update to any doc and removal of any doc actual clears the corresponding entry in the search index ensuring that non-existent entries don't show up in the results page. Search results can be grouped in various collections e.g. university collections, medical collections etc. Google Search Appliance very smartly handles the synonyms, as can be seen in the "narrow your search" feature. Indexing of content can be easily configured by specifying URLs
Tomas Srb - PeerSpot reviewer
Excellent support, good personalization, and helps simplify search
We'd like to see the following adjustments: * A focus on the client's products * Luigi's Box should gradually apply manual input to automation * Not all e-shops are the same, and they should differentiate more Our products are really diverse. Not everything can be done automatically, and manual intervention is required. However, support will solve everything. I'm looking forward to the product's AI implementation. Luigi's Box should also focus on the possibility of finding out more information about the user before he comes to the website. Otherwise, it's a nice product as it is, and I probably wouldn't make any major changes.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Indexing and Search solutions are best for your needs.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Luigi's Box?
Luigi's Box is an excellent tool that solves our problems with the search and recommended products in the carousels.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Luigi's Box?
When implementing, make the most of the knowledge of the person at Luigi's Box who will support you. They have a lot of experience.
What needs improvement with Luigi's Box?
Integration with GA4 and a plugin integrating with Google Looker Studio would be very useful. Currently, I collect data on searches in two places and I cannot conveniently combine them. The efficie...
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

British Airways, City of Calgary, Discovery Channel, Emerson Process Management, FINRA, GoDaddy.com, Hayneedle, Hays, Honeywell Aerospace, Honeywell Transportation, Posco, Soci_t_ G_n_rale Group
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Search Appliance vs. Luigi's Box and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.