Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Heavy.AI vs Kinetica comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Heavy.AI
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
37th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
AWS Marketplace (26th)
Kinetica
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
25th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Use Heavy.AI?
Share your opinion
SunilAgarwal - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to scale and good record to report capabilities but needs better training
It's not a very popular tool. There are very limited resources available in the market in terms of implementation. They need to offer training plans for graduates so that more resources are available in the market. The support needs to be faster. The solution needs to be lighter. It's a bit too heavy.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Kinetica?
It's not a very popular tool. There are very limited resources available in the market in terms of implementation. They need to offer training plans for graduates so that more resources are availab...
What is your primary use case for Kinetica?
This is a relational database tool. It's used for process standardization. You can write the process procurement to pay, order to cash, and record to report.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

OmniSci
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Pactriglo, TUTELA, Skyhook, npm, Inc., Simulmedia
Gsk, Defense Innovation Unit, Citibank, PubMatic,OVO
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.