HGST ActiveScale vs Red Hat Ceph Storage comparison

Western Digital and Red Hat are both solutions in the File and Object Storage category. Western Digital is ranked #35, while Red Hat is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. Western Digital holds a 0.1% mindshare in FaOS, compared to Red Hat’s 21.0% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution.

HGST ActiveScale

45 Views
32 Comparison Views

Red Hat Ceph Storage

Read 23 Red Hat Ceph Storage reviews

13,236 Views
11,589 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

HGST ActiveScale

Red Hat Ceph Storage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HGST ActiveScale and Red Hat Ceph Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MinIO, Red Hat, Dell Technologies and others in File and Object Storage.

To learn more, read our detailed File and Object Storage Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

File and Object Storage

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,340 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HGST ActiveScale

Ranking in File and Object Storage

35th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat Ceph Storage

Ranking in File and Object Storage

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Defined Storage (SDS) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the File and Object Storage category, the mindshare of HGST ActiveScale is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ceph Storage is 21.0%, down from 23.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

File and Object Storage

Featured Reviews

Use HGST ActiveScale?

Share your opinion

ANDRE VINICIUS HAMERSKI

IT Private Cloud & Infrastructure Leader at Sicredi

Offers cost-effective scalability through open-source storage integration

Ceph Storage allows us to add value related to cost and offers a unique experience compared to traditional storage. We appreciate the scalability of the open-source solution, allowing us to address our growing data needs without encountering major issues. Having used it as a pilot system in Brazil, we gained significant knowledge and the ability to manage our infrastructure as code.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,340 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Red Hat Ceph Storage compare with MiniO?

Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, ea...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat Ceph Storage?

The high availability of the solution is important to us.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Ceph Storage?

While the documentation for Ceph Storage is helpful, it could be improved. There are instances where we needed to consult additional online forums and communities for solutions to particular issues.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

MinIO vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Compared 44% of the time

VMware vSAN vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Compared 6% of the time

NetApp StorageGRID vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Compared 5% of the time

Dell PowerFlex vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Compared 3% of the time

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Red Hat Ceph Storage

Compared 3% of the time

More Red Hat Ceph Storage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

File and Object Storage

January 2025

Download HGST ActiveScale product report

Buyer's Guide

Software Defined Storage (SDS)

January 2025

Download Red Hat Ceph Storage product report

Also Known As

Active Archive System, ActiveScale P100, ActiveScale X100

Ceph

Overview

Big Data insights enable Fast Data applications. Your data can generate value when it’s aggregated, analyzed, and applied to business decisions. We live for long-term data preservation, and our ActiveScale object storage systems are changing the economics of data. The ActiveScale system architecture is designed for petabyte-scale datasets, facilitates storing data forever, and takes full advantage of our component-to-system vertical innovation.

Western Digital

Red Hat Ceph Storage is an enterprise open source platform that provides unified software-defined storage on standard, economical servers and disks. With block, object, and file storage combined into one platform, Red Hat Ceph Storage efficiently and automatically manages all your data.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

EPFL, Illumination Mac Guff

Dell, DreamHost

Buyer's Guide

File and Object Storage

January 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about MinIO, Red Hat, Dell Technologies and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,340 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.