Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HP Wolf Security vs Nyotron PARANOID comparison

HP and Nyotron are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. HP is ranked #39 with an average rating of 8.0, while Nyotron is ranked #49 with an average rating of 9.0. HP holds a 5.6% mindshare in EPP, compared to Nyotron’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nyotron users who would recommend it.
HP Wolf Security
Read 8 HP Wolf Security reviews
  • 6,743 Views
  • 5,747 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
Nyotron PARANOID
Read 2 Nyotron PARANOID reviews
  • 296 Views
  • 139 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

HP Wolf Security and Nyotron PARANOID are two distinct endpoint security solutions. Users seem to prefer HP Wolf Security for its customer support and competitive pricing. Despite that, Nyotron PARANOID is recognized for its robust features which justify its cost.

Features: HP Wolf Security is appreciated for its comprehensive threat isolation, easy integration into existing systems, and effective, straightforward protection. Nyotron PARANOID stands out with its advanced threat detection capabilities, innovative approach to malware prevention, and detailed security options.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest enhancements in HP Wolf Security's machine learning capabilities, real-time threat detection, and technology features. Nyotron PARANOID users seek a more intuitive learning curve, simplified reporting tools, and overall user-friendliness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HP Wolf Security is noted for its seamless deployment process and responsive customer support team. Nyotron PARANOID users report a more complex deployment but praise the knowledgeable support staff.

Pricing and ROI: HP Wolf Security offers a reasonable setup cost and delivers solid ROI as per user reviews. Nyotron PARANOID has a higher setup cost but offers greater ROI due to its powerful feature set.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed HP Wolf Security vs. Nyotron PARANOID Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
HP Wolf Security vs. Nyotron PARANOID
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,053 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

HP Wolf Security
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
39th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
3.4
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (40th)
Nyotron PARANOID
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
49th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 5.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nyotron PARANOID is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2344002 - PeerSpot reviewer
Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments
The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.
Read full review
Abel Browarnik - PeerSpot reviewer
A cost-effective security solution for endpoint protection
The initial setup is complex. It is rare to see an effective endpoint protection system that does not require some effort. It is neither on the cloud nor on-premises. You deploy it on every endpoint or server, irrespective of perimeter. You must use a deployment tool unless you prefer to do it manually on every endpoint or server. We used an automation tool to deploy it. Since we had MSI with us. We had to verify that everything worked, but it didn't take more than two weeks for 1000 endpoints.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."
"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."
"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."
"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."
"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."
"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."
"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."
"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."
"Nyotron protects your users and does not acquire any threat intelligence."
"First of all, it does the job. It prevents harm to the operating system. Also, the visibility it gives to the user and to the administrator is very good."
 

Cons

"They have always struggled with usability. The protection that it offers you is tremendous, but there's definitely an impact with use of resources on the computer. It's gotten a lot better now with Win 10. But sometimes, when you open up a website, it's going to take longer than it would without Bromium, and it's the same with documents."
"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."
"Room for improvement would be keeping up with the rate of change, specifically on Windows platforms. There are a lot of updates that come out for Microsoft Windows operating systems and the Bromium product needs to be able to keep up quickly with those updates and all the browser updates that are coming out. It's hard to do, but that's really where they need to be more responsive because we end up with problems and then we have to call support to get patches, etc."
"After a major release, there's always a lot of "dust settling." You have to work through all those issues and then you're fine for a while. The problem is, it's stable, it's fine, until the next major release comes out. Then you go back into the cycle again of uncertainty, instability, working through issues until they have patched and remediated all the problems that you're having. It's not unlike any other vendor though"
"Reporting is one of the shortcomings of the product. We do mine the data that's in there from a forensics perspective... It becomes very difficult because you have to spend a lot of time digging through the volumes of data. Reporting is absolutely the biggest shortcoming."
"The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11."
"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability. It works well with attacks, but it doesn't work well with all software on the clients. There is a lot of troubleshooting and a lot of things that need to be tuned to make it work and not break things."
"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."
More HP Wolf Security cons
"The main feature that is missing is to have the same solution on servers. Currently it's only protecting the client side, not the server. If they would add the server in the same solution, that would be great."
"The solution should be available on Linux and other platforms, including mobile platforms such as Android and iOS."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is reasonable."
"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."
"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."
"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."
"The product came as a bundle with the machine."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Educational Organization
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HP Wolf Security?
The product came as a bundle with the machine.
See all answers
What needs improvement with HP Wolf Security?
The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for HP Wolf Security?
I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments.
See all answers
What do you like most about Nyotron PARANOID?
Nyotron protects your users and does not acquire any threat intelligence.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nyotron PARANOID?
Users were willing to pay because of the peace of mind that comes with the solution.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Nyotron PARANOID?
There was an initial problem, we had to run the system in detection mode rather than prevention mode. The solution should be available on Linux and other platforms, including mobile platforms such ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security Logo
Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security
Compared 18% of the time
Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security Logo
Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security
Compared 15% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security
Compared 10% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs HP Wolf Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs HP Wolf Security
Compared 7% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security
Compared 6% of the time
More HP Wolf Security Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
HP Wolf Security
December 2024
HP Wolf Security reportDownload HP Wolf Security product report
Buyer's Guide
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
November 2024
Nyotron PARANOID reportDownload Nyotron PARANOID product report
 

Also Known As

Bromium vSentry
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
HP
Video not available
Nyotron
 

Overview

HP Wolf Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that bolsters your organization's cyber-resilience on multiple fronts. With its full-stack security approach, it ensures layered protection from hardware to the cloud, providing a robust defense against cyber threats. HP Wolf Security introduces endpoint isolation, a cutting-edge feature that effectively halts threats that may go unnoticed by Next-Generation Antivirus (NGAV) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems. Moreover, it extends its security coverage to printers, equipping them with advanced detection and self-healing capabilities to further safeguard your digital ecosystem. This integrated solution streamlines IT and security risk management, resulting in fewer alerts and false positives, and reduces the time and effort required for endpoint incident analysis and remediation. Notably, HP Wolf Security prioritizes productivity, allowing you to manage risk without disrupting the user experience, enabling worry-free work from anywhere, and offering rapid IT disaster recovery at scale. 

PARANOID is a game-changing endpoint protection solution that works seamlessly with your existing endpoint security solutions to create an almost impenetrable defense against even the most sophisticated attacks. Acting as the last line of defense – after threats bypass all perimeter and endpoint security layers – PARANOID protects your data from deletion, exfiltration, encryption, sabotage and more.

Delivering the first-ever OS-Centric Positive Security, PARANOID distinguishes between legitimate activities carried out by a program or user and threatening activities carried out by attacks.

 

Sample Customers

Valspar
El Al Airlines
Buyer's Guide
HP Wolf Security vs. Nyotron PARANOID
December 2024
Free Report: HP Wolf Security vs. Nyotron PARANOID
Find out what your peers are saying about HP Wolf Security vs. Nyotron PARANOID and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our HP Wolf Security vs. Nyotron PARANOID report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.