HP Wolf Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

HP and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. HP is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0, while Trellix is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.9. HP holds a 6.3% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

HP Wolf Security

Read 8 HP Wolf Security reviews

12,206 Views
10,131 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Read 158 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews

10,526 Views
7,895 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

HP Wolf Security

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 9, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and HP Wolf Security compete in endpoint protection. HP Wolf Security has an advantage with advanced threat isolation features, while Trellix is notable for competitive pricing and support.

Features: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers comprehensive threat protection, seamless integration with IT systems, and adaptive security measures. HP Wolf Security utilizes micro-virtualization, proactive malware isolation, and advanced threat detection, making it a leader in innovative endpoint security.

Room for Improvement: Trellix could enhance advanced threat isolation capabilities, improve proactive threat detection, and streamline feature customization. HP Wolf Security may benefit from simplifying deployment processes, enhancing integration flexibility, and improving user interface for ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix offers easier deployment and highly responsive customer support. HP Wolf Security provides a thorough onboarding process emphasizing a secure setup, though it tends to be more complex initially.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix is considered cost-effective with lower setup costs, providing quicker ROI. HP Wolf Security has higher initial expenses but suggests a greater ROI over time due to its robust security features and capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HP Wolf Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

22nd

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

30th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

9th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

158

Ranking in other categories

Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 6.3%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.9%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Bert Hickman

Owner at Stoneridge Engineering, LLC

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

Abdullah Al Hadi

Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd

Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies

There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security ( /categories/endpoint-protection-platform-epp ) can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."

"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."

"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."

"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."

"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."

"The compatibility with a variety of laptops is our biggest advantage."

"The most valuable features of Trellix Endpoint Security include its protection capabilities such as DNS and endpoint security, DNS threat prevention, as well as advanced threat prevention."

"The solution is a reliable and mature product. Its reporting function is robust, and the user interface is easy to use. End users can create customized reports with detailed reporting for any computer and export them in PDF or other formats. This reporting capability is very robust."

"I have found many of the features to be useful."

"The product can be installed in almost any environment"

"Initially, the DLP was very valuable for disabling access to USB drives."

"The primary reason the solution is good is because of its ease-of-use."

"The package of protection that it provides is useful. It has antivirus, malware protection, VPN, and a whole bunch of other features."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

Cons

"Reporting is one of the shortcomings of the product. We do mine the data that's in there from a forensics perspective... It becomes very difficult because you have to spend a lot of time digging through the volumes of data. Reporting is absolutely the biggest shortcoming."

"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."

"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability. It works well with attacks, but it doesn't work well with all software on the clients. There is a lot of troubleshooting and a lot of things that need to be tuned to make it work and not break things."

"When you deploy, not only is the user asked to reboot their computer, they are also asked to wait for 20 minutes while it sits there and initializes. It definitely impacts the end-user. It takes time away from their day."

"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."

"Room for improvement would be keeping up with the rate of change, specifically on Windows platforms. There are a lot of updates that come out for Microsoft Windows operating systems and the Bromium product needs to be able to keep up quickly with those updates and all the browser updates that are coming out. It's hard to do, but that's really where they need to be more responsive because we end up with problems and then we have to call support to get patches, etc."

"The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11."

"After a major release, there's always a lot of "dust settling." You have to work through all those issues and then you're fine for a while. The problem is, it's stable, it's fine, until the next major release comes out. Then you go back into the cycle again of uncertainty, instability, working through issues until they have patched and remediated all the problems that you're having. It's not unlike any other vendor though"

More HP Wolf Security cons

"There is room for improvement in the pricing. The price should be improved, it's high."

"The way that signatures work when using this solution could be improved. They could be more user friendly. We would like the ability to select a client's signature from a menu or file share to save time."

"What needs improvement in Trellix Endpoint Security is the reduction of resource consumption by the scanning feature. There should be daily signature updates for protection."

"The integration and display of the dashboards have to be done better."

"I would like to see more local integration for the applications that we use."

"The initial setup can be a bit complicated for those unfamiliar with the product."

"The software download features could stand improvement."

"An area of improvement for this solution is to make it easier to manage."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

"The pricing is comparable to other solutions on the market."

"Microsoft Defender is not cheap and from a cost perspective, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a better option."

"We pay for the license on an annual basis."

"Compared to Bitdefender, Trellix Endpoint Security is more expensive, but considering it comes with DLP, the solution's price is fine."

"We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive."

"Pricing is fair."

"The price of McAfee is pretty similar to Symantec, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"This product is costly."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Educational Organization

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Educational Organization

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HP Wolf Security?

The product came as a bundle with the machine.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HP Wolf Security?

The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HP Wolf Security?

I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments.

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?

It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 16% of the time

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 11% of the time

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 7% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 16% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security

July 2025

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

June 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Also Known As

Bromium vSentry

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Overview

HP Wolf Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that bolsters your organization's cyber-resilience on multiple fronts. With its full-stack security approach, it ensures layered protection from hardware to the cloud, providing a robust defense against cyber threats. HP Wolf Security introduces endpoint isolation, a cutting-edge feature that effectively halts threats that may go unnoticed by Next-Generation Antivirus (NGAV) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems. Moreover, it extends its security coverage to printers, equipping them with advanced detection and self-healing capabilities to further safeguard your digital ecosystem. This integrated solution streamlines IT and security risk management, resulting in fewer alerts and false positives, and reduces the time and effort required for endpoint incident analysis and remediation. Notably, HP Wolf Security prioritizes productivity, allowing you to manage risk without disrupting the user experience, enabling worry-free work from anywhere, and offering rapid IT disaster recovery at scale.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Valspar

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

July 2025

Free Report: HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.