HP Wolf Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

HP and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. HP is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while Trellix is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. HP holds a 5.9% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

HP Wolf Security

Read 8 HP Wolf Security reviews

13,108 Views
10,749 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Read 159 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews

9,310 Views
6,424 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

HP Wolf Security

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and HP Wolf Security are both key players in cybersecurity. Trellix appears to have an edge in features and pricing, while HP Wolf excels in ease of deployment and customer support.

Features: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is praised for its integrated threat detection and response, offering strong malware protection and integrated security management through its ePolicy Orchestrator. HP Wolf Security focuses on hardware-enforced security, emphasizing strong isolation technologies to protect sensitive data effectively.

Room for Improvement: Trellix could benefit from simplifying its deployment process, reducing the complexity for initial setup, and expanding training resources for new users. HP Wolf Security might improve by offering more integrated security management tools, reducing setup costs, and expanding its threat detection capabilities beyond hardware enforcement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HP Wolf Security is known for its easy deployment and excellent customer support, facilitating integration with existing systems. Trellix, however, requires more resources and time for deployment but offers comprehensive customer support post-implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix offers a competitive pricing model with a good return on investment, making it cost-effective for comprehensive security solutions. While HP Wolf Security has higher initial costs, its hardware-supported features provide substantial long-term value, justifying the investment over time.

To learn more, read our detailed HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 880,490 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HP Wolf Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

14th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

25th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

7th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

159

Ranking in other categories

Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 5.9%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.7%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform	3.7%
HP Wolf Security	5.9%
Other	90.4%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Bert Hickman

Owner at Stoneridge Engineering, LLC

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

Abhimanyu Das

Senior Associate at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Threat detection is effective, and the solution provides good control over device access, but it still needs better troubleshooting options for agent-related issues.

From an improvement perspective, I am looking for a way to troubleshoot situations where the endpoint agent becomes corrupted and requires reinstallation, as there is currently no option to resolve these issues without rebooting the system. I give it a rating of seven because, in today’s scenario, the portal is complicated to navigate. The Trellix Endpoint Security Platform dashboard is somewhat difficult to understand, and it takes considerable time to familiarize oneself with the tools and policies compared to other solutions. For on-premises deployment, I would also like to highlight that the architecture is quite complex, which is an area Trellix Endpoint Security Platform should consider improving.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."

"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."

"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."

"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."

"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."

"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."

"I feel McAfee Endpoint Security to be a good, mature product."

"The most valuable feature of Trellix Endpoint Security is containment, which takes less than a minute."

"The detection is great and the solution is constantly improving."

"I have found many of the features to be useful."

"What I like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint is that it's very user-friendly. You do need some knowledge on how to navigate the portal, but as soon as you've gained that knowledge, navigation will no longer be an issue. I have no complaints about McAfee MVISION Endpoint. For me, the product is perfect the way it is. It's great right now, and it's doing good as it is."

"The most valuable features are reporting from the ePO console and the advanced threat protection (ATP)."

"The DLP and user interface are the most valuable feature."

"The installation is pretty straightforward."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

Cons

"Initial setup was complex. There were many configurations that needed to be worked out with the vendor. The setup required hands-on assistance from Bromium."

"When you deploy, not only is the user asked to reboot their computer, they are also asked to wait for 20 minutes while it sits there and initializes. It definitely impacts the end-user. It takes time away from their day."

"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."

"They have always struggled with usability. The protection that it offers you is tremendous, but there's definitely an impact with use of resources on the computer. It's gotten a lot better now with Win 10. But sometimes, when you open up a website, it's going to take longer than it would without Bromium, and it's the same with documents."

"After a major release, there's always a lot of "dust settling." You have to work through all those issues and then you're fine for a while. The problem is, it's stable, it's fine, until the next major release comes out. Then you go back into the cycle again of uncertainty, instability, working through issues until they have patched and remediated all the problems that you're having. It's not unlike any other vendor though"

"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."

"The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11."

"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability. It works well with attacks, but it doesn't work well with all software on the clients. There is a lot of troubleshooting and a lot of things that need to be tuned to make it work and not break things."

More HP Wolf Security cons

"Users can just install software into their computers. We need some sort of application control system that, if there are any pieces of software that are not whitelisted, then the solution could flag it or maybe alert the administers. That would be very helpful."

"Impacts performance of the servers quite negatively."

"The complexity of advanced modules can be improved."

"The DAC (Dynamic Application Containment) component of this product needs improvement."

"The user interface could be improved by making it more user-friendly. There are multiple solutions and there is no clear line differentiating all of them. There is a centralized console where we manage everything but most of the administrators feel a little confused when it comes to managing multiple products from a single place."

"So far, McAfee MVISION Endpoint ticks off all of our boxes, but its pricing could always be better."

"The endpoint has room for improvement because it's restrictive, it's very sensitive. Sometimes it can delete something that you need and so sometimes you have to disable the antivirus."

"I would like to see more local integration for the applications that we use."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

"The price of the solution is in the middle range compare to others and could be reduced. There are not any additional costs."

"Trellix may cost around $46 to $47 for a single license without an EDR."

"When comparing the solution to others it is a bit expensive. We are on a monthly license."

"The price of McAfee is pretty similar to Symantec, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"It is based on an annual subscription."

"Pricing is reasonable and runs at a cost per user per year."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint is not very good, and I would rate its cost three out of five, though I won't be able to mention how much its actual price is."

"Licensing fees are paid yearly."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,490 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

14%

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	67
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HP Wolf Security?

The product came as a bundle with the machine.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HP Wolf Security?

The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HP Wolf Security?

I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments.

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?

It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 13% of the time

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 11% of the time

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 6% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security

January 2026

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

December 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Also Known As

Bromium vSentry

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Overview

HP Wolf Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that bolsters your organization's cyber-resilience on multiple fronts. With its full-stack security approach, it ensures layered protection from hardware to the cloud, providing a robust defense against cyber threats. HP Wolf Security introduces endpoint isolation, a cutting-edge feature that effectively halts threats that may go unnoticed by Next-Generation Antivirus (NGAV) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems. Moreover, it extends its security coverage to printers, equipping them with advanced detection and self-healing capabilities to further safeguard your digital ecosystem. This integrated solution streamlines IT and security risk management, resulting in fewer alerts and false positives, and reduces the time and effort required for endpoint incident analysis and remediation. Notably, HP Wolf Security prioritizes productivity, allowing you to manage risk without disrupting the user experience, enabling worry-free work from anywhere, and offering rapid IT disaster recovery at scale.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Valspar

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

January 2026

Free Report: HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,490 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.