HPE File Storage and Object Storage vs Qumulo comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Qumulo are both solutions in the File and Object Storage category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #32, while Qumulo is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 0.2% mindshare in FaOS, compared to Qumulo’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qumulo users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

HPE File Storage and Object Storage, alongside Qumulo, compete in the storage solutions category. HPE File Storage and Object Storage have the upper hand in pricing and support, while Qumulo is favored for its advanced features, deemed worth the investment.

Features: HPE File Storage and Object Storage offer advanced data management, scalability, and robust security, ideal for compliance and governance needs. Qumulo provides real-time analytics, simplified data access, and high-performance hybrid cloud capabilities, valued for its intuitive design and comprehensive functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE File Storage and Object Storage provides a structured deployment model with reliable customer support, aiding organizations that need guidance and support during implementation. Qumulo is noted for its flexible deployment, rapid integration, and proactive customer service, making it suitable for companies seeking agility and quick setup.

Pricing and ROI: HPE File Storage and Object Storage offer competitive pricing with a solid ROI for cost-conscious organizations. Their lower setup costs make them economical initially. Qumulo, with higher setup costs, provides significant ROI through innovative features and operational efficiency, which many find justify the investment.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE File Storage and Object Storage vs. Qumulo Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE File Storage and Object Storage vs. Qumulo

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pure Storage FlashBlade

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the File and Object Storage category, the mindshare of Pure Storage FlashBlade is 5.8%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE File Storage and Object Storage is 0.2%. The mindshare of Qumulo is 3.8%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

File and Object Storage

Featured Reviews

Eric Black

Solutions Architect at Recovery Point Systems

The ability to leverage multi-tenancy along with immutability is a huge benefit for us

The only thing I feel FlashBlade is missing is the SOS API. If it had SOS API, that would put it well over the top. Veeam Backup specifically has started to streamline their API, and they are doing that with SOS API. They have optimized it. Any of the S3 devices out there that support this SOS API can have far more API calls at once. On our side, that translates to better restoration. With SOS API, it can leverage far more restorations at a single given time or read from the device in simple terms. That results in maximizing the output and throughput from the device itself.

Read full review

Luiz Gasparelo

Owner at Lnetwork

Has robust security features ensuring data protection, and clients benefits from fast access to integrated data

The best features of HPE Cloud Object Storage include easy management, scalability, and unified access to both object and block storage. Security measures are robust, ensuring data protection, and clients benefit from fast access to integrated data across different platforms like Cisco, Microsoft SQL, and Palantir in a unified view.

Read full review

VinceVitro

Senior Storage Architect at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Useful data sharing, simple cluster scaling, and excellent support

One aspect of Qumulo that I hoped to see improved was its software upgrade process, which did see significant progress during my usage. Initially, upgrading the software resulted in several minutes of system downtime. However, by the time I departed last summer, the downtime had reduced to mere ten seconds. Although I am unsure if Qumulo has yet achieved a completely outage-free upgrade, I simply performed the upgrades early in the morning before the marketing department began its workday, so any downtime was inconsequential.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have seen a reduction in the total cost of ownership by around 20%."

"Among its most appealing features are its ease of handling and minimal maintenance requirements."

"It's very easy-to-use."

"I would rate this solution an eight plus. It has has good flexibility and stability, it's easy to manage and the response time is good."

"Using this solution has made our backups more reliable."

"The initial setup was straightforward. If you know how to plug in power and network you're pretty much qualified. They were on site to configure the network, the box to fit into our network architecture. Other than that, we self-managed from there."

"The main feature I have found to be product replication."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is performance."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade pros

"This is a scalable solution that is available when we need it."

"The best features of HPE Cloud Object Storage include easy management, scalability, and unified access to both object and block storage. Security measures are robust, ensuring data protection, and clients benefit from fast access to integrated data across different platforms like Cisco, Microsoft SQL, and Palantir in a unified view."

"One of the features offered and used by many clients is file-sharing."

"The most valuable feature is real-time analytics."

"The data protection algorithm to protect the data between the nodes has been the most valuable feature. The integration with backup platforms such as Veeam and Veritas has also been valuable."

"The most valuable feature of Qumulo is the ability to share files and reliability."

"The ratio of total operational cost to complexity versus feature set is very good."

"The most valuable features of Qumulo are its rolling updates and all-day availability."

"The feature that I like most is the analytics part of the file system."

"The most valuable features of Qumulo are the ease of management and special permissions that are quick to enable. The overall performance of the solution is good."

"It is a very stable product. I never faced any issues."

Cons

"It usually comes down to just what you hit and the value you're getting when you spend the money and license the products. I would always go, "If you want to make things better, lower your price and make your licensing simpler." There's always an opportunity around that."

"The features provided for SMB customers are limited."

"The solution is expensive."

"Pure Storage FlashBlade should improve on more cloud integration."

"The documentational aspect of FlashBlade needs improvement."

"I would like to see better integration."

"Its configuration should be easier."

"I want efficiency. FlashBlade doesn't have efficiency now."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade cons

"At present, the initial setup is slow."

"Our customers in Canada cannot use it because it has to be compliant in the same country."

"Technical support is not available locally for us."

"In the next release, I would like to see the ability to have more control at a terminal level of the file system."

"One aspect of Qumulo that I hoped to see improved was its software upgrade process, which did see significant progress during my usage. Initially, upgrading the software resulted in several minutes of system downtime. However, by the time I departed last summer, the downtime had reduced to mere ten seconds. Although I am unsure if Qumulo has yet achieved a completely outage-free upgrade, I simply performed the upgrades early in the morning before the marketing department began its workday, so any downtime was inconsequential."

"The support for iMac and protocols should be improved, not all features are available."

"The price of the software is a bit expensive, so a reduction in cost would make it more competitive."

"In the future, I would like to see non-disruptive updates."

"Qumulo should continue to expand automation and orchestration capabilities."

"Some anti-theft permissions do not transfer well to Qumulo."

"The solution could improve availability and improve data protection or data services such as compression of deduplication. In a future release, we'd like to have more cloud API integrations."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the tool's pricing a seven to eight out of ten."

"The pricing for FlashBlade is between cheap and moderate."

"Our licensing is renewed annually."

"It is within reason for what you get. From what we have found comparing it to other vendors, it is in the same range as others. Given the choice, we would definitely redeploy it based on the cost."

"Support is a separate line item. Support is a different cost, but whatever your support is now, that's what you're going to pay forever. If your support's $100 today, six years from now it's $100. It doesn't fluctuate unless you upgrade it, or change it, etc."

"I understand that it is competitively priced compared to other brands."

"The price could be cheaper."

"Licensing fees are paid yearly."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade pricing and cost advice

"Licensing is based on a per terabyte basis."

"HPE Cloud Object Storage is competitively priced and offers a good value for its solution. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees."

"Pricing is middle of the road, but it seems that it should be less expensive."

"The price of the solution is in the middle range compared to others. We look at the price per terabyte."

"The price of Qumulo is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

37%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pure Storage FlashBlade?

The tool's most valuable feature is its fast performance, especially in handling snapshots. It helps during power out...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure Storage FlashBlade?

The pricing for FlashBlade is between cheap and moderate. FlashBlade is worth the money due to the experience and per...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pure Storage FlashBlade?

Its configuration should be easier. There should be easier language for the configuration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Cloud Object Storage?

HPE Cloud Object Storage is competitively priced and offers a good value for its solution. There are no additional co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Cloud Object Storage?

At present, the initial setup is slow.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE Cloud Object Storage?

Many companies use HPE Cloud Object Storage for analytics solutions in MongoDB to create business insights. In our da...

See all answers

What do you like most about Qumulo?

The most valuable features of Qumulo are its rolling updates and all-day availability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qumulo?

Initially, the failover was supposed to be implemented in Qumulo itself. This failed to happen mid-case, so we had to...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qumulo?

We use Qumulo for end-user storage and some application storage as well.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 21% of the time

VAST Data vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 12% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 11% of the time

MinIO vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 11% of the time

Scality RING vs Pure Storage FlashBlade

Compared 3% of the time

More Pure Storage FlashBlade Competitors

No data available

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Qumulo

Compared 26% of the time

VAST Data vs Qumulo

Compared 15% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs Qumulo

Compared 10% of the time

Scality RING vs Qumulo

Compared 9% of the time

Cloudian HyperStore vs Qumulo

Compared 4% of the time

More Qumulo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Pure Storage FlashBlade

March 2025

Download Pure Storage FlashBlade product report

Buyer's Guide

File and Object Storage

March 2025

HPE File Storage and Object Storage report

Download HPE File Storage and Object Storage product report

Buyer's Guide

NAS

March 2025

Download Qumulo product report

Also Known As

No data available

HP Cloud Object Storage

No data available

Overview

FlashBlade is the industry’s most advanced scale-out storage for unstructured data, powered by a modern, massively parallel architecture to consolidate complex data silos (like backup appliances and data lakes) and accelerate tomorrow’s discoveries and insights.

Pure Storage

HPE File Storage and Object Storage efficiently manages large volumes of data, facilitating quick access, retrieval, and data integrity. It supports high-performance computing, scalability, robust security, and integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure.

Recognized for its scalability, reliability, and security, HPE File Storage and Object Storage is valued for easy integration with existing systems and cost-effectiveness. It excels in handling large datasets and simplifies storage resource management. The solution supports diverse data formats and facilitates seamless data migration. However, users note challenges with the initial setup, performance during heavy data loads, and some integration and scaling issues. There are also concerns about the lack of advanced features, insufficient support documentation, and the system's high cost.

What are the most important features of HPE File Storage and Object Storage?

Scalability: Adapts to growing data needs efficiently.
Reliability: Ensures uninterrupted data access and integrity.
Security: Offers robust protection for data across environments.
Integration: Easily connects with existing infrastructure.
Cost-effectiveness: Provides value without compromising performance.
Data Format Support: Handles multiple data formats seamlessly.
Data Migration: Facilitates smooth data transfer between systems.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Performance: Efficient data handling and quick access.
Operation Efficiency: Simplifies data management tasks.
Reduced Costs: Balances quality and expense.
Scalability: Meets evolving data storage requirements.
Security: Protects sensitive information effectively.

Industries such as healthcare and finance utilize HPE File Storage and Object Storage for data archiving, backup, and analytics. In healthcare, it manages patient records and medical imaging, ensuring data accuracy and accessibility. In finance, it supports transaction data storage, compliance, and risk management. The versatility in handling diverse data storage needs makes it a valuable asset across sectors.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Qumulo is a data storage and management platform that promotes object-based storage for users, backup archives, and surveillance. Its primary use case is to provide a cost-effective and feature-rich solution for managing large data.

Qumulo's data protection algorithm ensures the safety of node data, while its integration with backup platforms like Veeam and Veritas makes it easy to manage backups. The platform offers a good balance between operational cost and complexity versus feature set, making it an attractive option for businesses of all sizes.

Qumulo

Sample Customers

ServiceNow, Mercedes-AMG Petronas Motorsport, Dominos, Man AHL

China Merchants Bank, Hexaware, Snagajob

County of Riverside Sheriff Department, Hyundai Mobis Automotive North America, University of Arizona, UCSD - San Diego Supercomputer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Sinclair Oil, Royal Dutch Shell, Kaiser Permanente, Deluxe Creative, Vexcel Imaging, University of Florida, The Madison Square Garden Company, Arizona State University, Cinesite, San Diego Padres Baseball, Johns Hopkins University - School of Medicine, IHME, EllieMae, Washington State University.

Buyer's Guide

HPE File Storage and Object Storage vs. Qumulo

March 2025

Free Report: HPE File Storage and Object Storage vs. Qumulo

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE File Storage and Object Storage vs. Qumulo and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE File Storage and Object Storage vs. Qumulo report.

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.