We performed a comparison between HPE ProLiant DL Servers and Huawei FusionServer RH Series Rack Servers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Lenovo and others in Rack Servers."HPE ProLiant DL Servers are easy to maintain. When we need to update the firmware or we need to log on remotely via the IO management interface. It's very convenient, easy. The supply chain is fast when we need to replace some failed hardware, such as hard drives or power supplies. Most of the time, it only takes a few days. The HPE ProLiant DL Servers services are officially certified for Red Hat usage which is a big advantage."
"It's flexible."
"Stability is where HPE dominates competitors like Dell and Cisco. The servers are highly reliable, and we are impressed with the technology HPE offers."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is HPE Integrated Lights-Out (iLO)...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Very practical and easy to maintain."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is scalability."
"It is very stable. I can rate it as a 99.99% stable server from HPE. There is zero downtime, especially in the ProLiant 380 series."
"It's easy to upgrade, and it is very easy to take care of the firmware upgrades."
"The most valuable thing about Huawei FusionServer is the fact that it's easy to use."
"It's scalable but we are switching to workstation for some software because the CPU speed isn't fast enough anymore."
"In DL 500 systems, the flow of air is not good enough, and some components get overheated. IBM systems have better airflow and scalability. We have a data center that has limited physical space. Therefore, we need to maximize the processing or compute systems that we use. In HP servers, such as DL 500, there are only four processors, whereas IBM servers, such as SR 916, have eight processors. We don't get any support from HP because of our geographical location. We solve all problems ourselves by doing research on the internet. It would be good to get HP support."
"The price of the solution could be less expensive to be more competitive."
"The initial configuration process could be simpler."
"There is a challenge sometimes with having quick access to some of these components when you need them. It takes a lot of time to get spare parts from genuine sellers."
"The price of HPE ProLiant DL Servers could improve."
"The licensing fees are expensive and have room for improvement."
"The product must provide time travel features."
"In the next release, I'd like to see more features not in the hardware but in the platform where I can manage all the servers and the hardware of the servers."
HPE ProLiant DL Servers is ranked 2nd in Rack Servers with 156 reviews while Huawei FusionServer RH Series Rack Servers is ranked 11th in Rack Servers with 1 review. HPE ProLiant DL Servers is rated 8.6, while Huawei FusionServer RH Series Rack Servers is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of HPE ProLiant DL Servers writes "Good availability and management console with good reliability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Huawei FusionServer RH Series Rack Servers writes "Simple to use and compatible with all other operating systems". HPE ProLiant DL Servers is most compared with Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers, Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers, HPE Apollo, Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers and Oracle SPARC Servers, whereas Huawei FusionServer RH Series Rack Servers is most compared with Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers and Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers.
See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.
We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.