Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HPE Serviceguard vs Windows Server Failover Clustering comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Microsoft are both solutions in the High Availability Clustering category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #4, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 13.3% mindshare in HAC, compared to Microsoft’s 29.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution.
HPE Serviceguard
Read 2 HPE Serviceguard reviews
  • 328 Views
  • 184 Comparison Views
0% willing to recommend
Windows Server Failover Clu...
Read 8 Windows Server Failover Clustering reviews
  • 1,321 Views
  • 504 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between HPE Serviceguard and Windows Server Failover Clustering based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two High Availability Clustering solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed HPE Serviceguard vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
HPE Serviceguard vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,053 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

HPE Serviceguard
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
4th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Windows Server Failover Clu...
Ranking in High Availability Clustering
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the High Availability Clustering category, the mindshare of HPE Serviceguard is 13.3%, up from 10.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Windows Server Failover Clustering is 29.0%, down from 35.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
High Availability Clustering
 

Featured Reviews

AH
The solution's most valuable feature is the ability to create a Mount Point Package
They should continue with the certificate for the consequent year as well. They must keep the product up and running for a long time as it is currently static. There are a lot of challenges as well. Sometimes, the mount point gets lost depending on link failure or census problems. The solution works on a standard script, but it has many tech issues to fix with the OS. You have to keep checking network connectivity, OS connectivity, etc. If any of these fails, then you do not get the certificate.
Read full review
BL
An affordable solution for warehousing but lacks scalability
We use the solution for warehouse purposes. We built an SQL server on the solution The solution has a hot-swap feature. If one of the servers fails, we’ll still have a running system. It takes a few seconds to swap to the other server. The system has no interruption and is highly available. The…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"HPE Serviceguard is stable, it has high availability for production."
"The solution's scalability is excellent."
"Some of the advantages, are it can give you the ability to choose."
"The product is stable."
"The solution switches over to another server in case the server goes down."
"The reliability is pretty good."
"The most valuable features of Windows Server Failover Clustering are the ISS, failover cluster, and DC."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily create clusters supporting geo-redundancy."
 

Cons

"Many customers want virtualization or high availability but not on HPE Serviceguard with the appliance."
"They must keep the product up and running for a long time as it is currently static."
"They could drop the price or improve the cost of the hyper-converged component of it all. Right now, licensing is expensive and complex."
"The stability is good, except for when something crashes or shuts down unexpectedly, then it can be a bit difficult to reestablish the service in a stable state."
"The tool's pricing is high."
"The product should be less dependent on network configuration."
"There are times when we do the system security updates and have to restart the server which is difficult because we need to wait until the end of the day or when working hours are finished. There are service updates that have a requirement to restart the system and it is not convenient."
"The standard, non-enterprise technical support could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is available at a high price. I rate it as a two for pricing."
"The functionality is included in Windows Server licences."
"We are on an annual license to use this solution."
"So if you acquire the Windows server license, you will also get all of the Windows services licenses."
"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
30%
Outsourcing Company
5%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
Renewables & Environment Company
5%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HPE Serviceguard?
The solution's scalability is excellent.
See all answers
What needs improvement with HPE Serviceguard?
They should continue with the certificate for the consequent year as well. They must keep the product up and running for a long time as it is currently static. There are a lot of challenges as well...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering HPE Serviceguard?
I recommend the solution to others as it is a good solution. I rate it as an eight.
See all answers
What do you like most about Windows Server Failover Clustering?
The product is stable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Windows Server Failover Clustering?
There is no extra charge except a service fee for some professional work. I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Windows Server Failover Clustering?
The solution uses external storage, while third-party solutions don't use external storage. They're using a mirror to create a partition on each server and synchronize the data in the background. I...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Veritas InfoScale Availability vs HPE Serviceguard Logo
Veritas InfoScale Availability vs HPE Serviceguard
Compared 53% of the time
More HPE Serviceguard Competitors
Veritas InfoScale Availability vs Windows Server Failover Clustering Logo
Veritas InfoScale Availability vs Windows Server Failover Clustering
Compared 48% of the time
DRBD vs Windows Server Failover Clustering Logo
DRBD vs Windows Server Failover Clustering
Compared 22% of the time
IBM PowerHA System Mirror vs Windows Server Failover Clustering Logo
IBM PowerHA System Mirror vs Windows Server Failover Clustering
Compared 14% of the time
More Windows Server Failover Clustering Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
High Availability Clustering
November 2024
HPE Serviceguard reportDownload HPE Serviceguard product report
Buyer's Guide
Windows Server Failover Clustering
November 2024
Windows Server Failover Clustering reportDownload Windows Server Failover Clustering product report
 

Also Known As

Serviceguard, HP Serviceguard
No data available
 

Learn More

Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Microsoft
 

Overview

HPE Serviceguard is a high availability and disaster recovery clustering solution, that increases uptime for your critical applications by protecting from a multitude of infrastructure and application faults across physical or virtual environments over any distance. It reduces impact of unplanned downtime with no compromise on data integrity and performance. Furthermore, it helps achieve near zero planned downtime for maintenance.
Windows Server Failover Clustering provides infrastructure features that support the high-availability and disaster recovery scenarios of hosted server applications such as Microsoft SQL Server and Microsoft Exchange. If a cluster node or service fails, the services that were hosted on that node can be automatically or manually transferred to another available node in a process known as failover.
 

Sample Customers

RI-Solution, FAW-Volkswagen, Pella, Octo Telematics, Kenya Ports Authority
Karl-Franzens-Universit_t Graz, NAV CANADA, Magnachip, ólectricit_ de France, Cambridgeshire Constabulary, Bank Alfalah Ltd., Local Government Association of Queensland
Buyer's Guide
HPE Serviceguard vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering
December 2024
Free Report: HPE Serviceguard vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Serviceguard vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our HPE Serviceguard vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering report.
See our list of best High Availability Clustering vendors.

We monitor all High Availability Clustering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.