Hubble vs IBM Planning Analytics comparison

Hubble and IBM are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. Hubble is ranked #33, while IBM is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.7. Hubble holds a 0.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to IBM’s 8.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hubble users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Hubble

Read 5 Hubble reviews

47 Views
31 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Planning Analytics

Read 24 IBM Planning Analytics reviews

1,812 Views
1,188 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Hubble

IBM Planning Analytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

IBM Planning Analytics and Hubble compete in enterprise performance management. IBM Planning Analytics has an advantage due to its advanced predictive analytics and robust planning capabilities, offering strategic insights. Hubble stands out for real-time data integration and ease of use, making it valuable for financial operations.

Features: IBM Planning Analytics includes predictive analytics, scenario modeling, and powerful data integration, enabling effective planning and forecasting. Hubble focuses on real-time financial reporting, user-friendly navigation, and accelerating period-end closes.

Room for Improvement: IBM Planning Analytics could improve by enhancing user navigation, reducing complexity in scenario modeling, and offering more cost-effective solutions. Hubble can benefit from expanding strategic planning features, improving system responsiveness during high data loads, and increasing integration options with third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Planning Analytics offers flexible deployment in cloud, on-premises, and hybrid models with comprehensive support services. Hubble simplifies deployment with a user-friendly process but requires initial guidance for optimal use, contrasting IBM's flexibility with a streamlined implementation process.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Planning Analytics involves higher initial setup costs due to its comprehensive feature set and customization options, promising significant long-term ROI. Hubble provides a cost-effective solution with lower setup costs and quicker ROI through its focus on speed and simplified reporting.

To learn more, read our detailed Hubble vs. IBM Planning Analytics Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hubble vs. IBM Planning Analytics

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,396 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hubble

Ranking in Business Performance Management

33rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Financial Performance and Strategy Management (15th), Data Visualization (27th), Financial Close Software (25th)

IBM Planning Analytics

Ranking in Business Performance Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Hubble is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Planning Analytics is 8.7%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Priya Govind

Financial / IT Director at a manufacturing company with 501-1,000 employees

Excellent for budgeting and forecasting, but long-term it will no longer be developed or supported

The fact that in a few years' time it is no longer going to be supported is a big concern. Therefore, I would advise against Hubble. Additionally, I think we underestimated the time for deployment, we thought it would be a few months and it took much longer than expected because the consultants didn't understand our process in detail before committing to the process. On a scale of one to ten, I would give Hubble a seven.

Read full review

Gnanavel-Chakkarapani

Junior Consultant at CMA CGM

Can easily create dashboards and helps businesses improve forecasting accuracy

The product has improved our company's forecasting accuracy since it serves as a very useful tool for our sales and controller teams as they easily get to enter the inputs using views in TM1, which gets loaded into our main database. If there are sales team members in different parts of the world, like in Hong Kong and Singapore, they may prefer to use IBM Planning Analytics, which is easy to use when compared to the Excel tool. Speaking about planning analytics and data analysis, I would say that our company used to use IBM Cognos Analytics for reporting, where we used to use Cognos Dynamic Cubes so that users can easily use its drag and drop features while getting to see the data for which the users had to wait for two to three minutes prior to its use. In our company, tons of data are loaded into the memory, and users can use Cognos Dynamic Cubes to analyze data and understand it. The AI capabilities of IBM have benefited our planning strategy as they are very useful for business. The tool allows the easy creation of dashboard reports using AI capabilities. No technical knowledge is required for business use cases. It is possible to integrate the product in scenarios where some new integrations are available. I remember that my company used Azure Data Factory to connect Azure, Oracle, and IBM WebSphere Application Server. When it comes to IBM Planning Analytics, it is complex to integrate it with LDAP and or any other authentication tool offered by Microsoft. In our company, some users like to integrate IBM Planning Analytics with the common LDAP or Microsoft AD, which we currently use for all our applications. The authentication part is difficult to configure with IBM Planning Analytics. The maintenance of the product is easy. My company has scheduled maintenance on the product every week, especially during forecast times, so that memories automatically lapse and users can freely access their servers. The use of the tool has had an impact on collaboration within our company's planning team since everyone knows how to easily access the data and publish the results. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are both its budgeting and forecasting."

"The scenario modeling capabilities are frequently used to create different scenarios, compare them, and see which action leads to which result."

"Planning Analytics' best features include automatic updates and slicing."

"A lot of the platform is in-memory, so Planning Analytics can run calculations quite fast. It also offers several user interfaces. And in the newest version of Planning Analytics, there is a new one called the Planning Analytics Workspace. Maybe it could be useful for the business side."

"All the different platforms are well integrated."

"The most valuable feature is that it is able to slice and dice the data."

"It's a very stable, robust product."

"The ease of use is valuable. The fact that it's plugged into Excel spreadsheets is also valuable. It provides additional functionality where you can slice and dice the information in a way that you can't do with spreadsheets"

"Its stability helps controllers win time in their planning processes."

More IBM Planning Analytics pros

Cons

"We have been advised by the owners that the budgeting tool is no longer going to be supported with future development, so my recommendation would be for them to continue to invest in development. Otherwise, at some point we will have to migrate to another technology."

"Extracting data is a little slow."

"The workspace API should be improved and documented so we know better which objects are used."

"It's wonky, and not super user-friendly with Excel."

"It is a bit expensive, but it does the job."

"Adding predefined templates could be beneficial."

"The local authentication part is difficult to manage in the product, making it an area where improvements are required."

"If we talk only about the TM1 engine, it's quite rich and possibly too rich, making it complex to perform simple tasks."

"The tool should include features for prediction. It can also improve the scalability."

More IBM Planning Analytics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Compared with the other tools in the market, IBM Planning Analytics is a bit expensive."

"IBM Planning Analytics is not the cheapest solution, but it's priced per the market standard for this type of solution. I rate the price at seven out of ten."

"It is a bit expensive, but you get what you are paying for."

"I would rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten since it's expensive."

"Our licensing cost is approximately $50,000.00 per year."

"The license of this solution is paid annually. Most of my customers choose a license that includes support."

"IBM Planning Analytics is priced well, and licensing costs are yearly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

10%

Educational Organization

43%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about IBM Planning Analytics?

The most valuable features of IBM Planning Analytics for streamlining planning processes include a unified database where all data are centralized.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Planning Analytics?

TM1 is quite expensive, and I'd rate the pricing as an eight out of ten. While we do get what we want in terms of functionalities and compatibility with other IBM tools, given the product's old arc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Planning Analytics?

Since I'm using TM1 as an old version of Planning Analytics, it wouldn't be fair to specify what needs improvement because it's possible these issues have already been addressed in newer versions. ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tableau vs Hubble

Compared 34% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Hubble

Compared 34% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Platform vs Hubble

Compared 32% of the time

More Hubble Competitors

Microsoft Power BI vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 26% of the time

SAP Analytics Cloud vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 19% of the time

Anaplan vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 10% of the time

Jedox vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Cognos vs IBM Planning Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM Planning Analytics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Performance Management

April 2025

Download Hubble product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Planning Analytics

April 2025

Download IBM Planning Analytics product report

Also Known As

No data available

Cognos TM1, IBM Cognos TM1

Overview

Hubble by insightsoftware.com is an integrated suite of business performance management apps, for JD Edwards and Oracle E-Business Suite, offering reporting, analytics, and planning in a single real-time solution that fully understands your ERP. Hubble integrates all of your critical business systems so that users at all levels have access to real-time data and the ability to automate planning, budgeting, forecasting, and financial close processes. Hubble reporting allows you to connect the whole company around a single source of truth for consistent, accurate decision making. In the financial reporting application, you have access to pre-built templates or you can create your own custom reports. The Hubble analytics application connects data from every facet of your organization to your ERP to create personalized dashboards, scorecards, and visuals. The planning application gives finance and business users the ability to budget, forecast, plan, and close in real-time. View your actuals next to budgets for an up-to-date view of current business performance. You can create your own reports, so that IT no longer needs to be involved.

Hubble

IBM Planning Analytics is an integrated planning solution that uses AI to automate planning, budgeting, and forecasting and drive more intelligent workflows.

Built on TM1, IBM’s powerful calculation engine, this enterprise performance management tool allows you to transcend the limits of manual planning and become the Analytics Hero your business needs. Quickly and easily drive faster, more accurate plans for FP&A, sales, supply chain and beyond.

IBM

Sample Customers

Dole, Ghiradelli, Ninetendo, Avon, Hallmark, Treasury Wine Estates, Kitchener-Wilmot Hydro, City of Prince George, Weingarten Realty Investors, Coloplast A/S, Western Forest Products Inc, The Deltic Group Ltd, Financial Times, Johnson & Johnson, Mitsubishi, National Geographic Maps

ManpowerGroup, Convergys, AIG, Orchard Brands, Citibank, InterGen, Northwestern University, EF Education First, Ironside, Bazan Group, CSOB Insurance, Macquarie Group, Charles Stanley, SATO, Government of Sint Maarten, BMW Financial Services

Buyer's Guide

Hubble vs. IBM Planning Analytics

April 2025

Free Report: Hubble vs. IBM Planning Analytics

Find out what your peers are saying about Hubble vs. IBM Planning Analytics and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hubble vs. IBM Planning Analytics report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.