Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs ibi iWay Service Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

ibi iWay Service Manager
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (17th)
TIBCO BusinessWorks
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

ibi iWay Service Manager and TIBCO BusinessWorks aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. ibi iWay Service Manager is designed for Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) and holds a mindshare of 0.5%, up 0.5% compared to last year.
TIBCO BusinessWorks, on the other hand, focuses on Data Integration, holds 1.0% mindshare, up 0.7% since last year.
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

Use ibi iWay Service Manager?
Share your opinion
Choon Hwa Khoh - PeerSpot reviewer
May 16, 2024
A java based platform, which is used for application integration and has a user-friendly GUI
TIBCO BusinessWorks is used as middleware for us I like TIBCO BusinessWorks because it has a user-friendly GUI for developing solutions. The palette offers a wide range of activities, making it easy to configure and drop activities into the solution. I haven't encountered any drawbacks with…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"TIBCO licensing is yearly and very costly for a company like ours."
"My understanding is that the licensing is very costly."
"I give the cost of the solution a four out of ten."
"I would rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."
"I don't have the prices of the products, but I know that TIBCO is not a cheap solution. I think that this solution is more suitable for large companies because I don't think that small- or medium-sized companies would have the money for this solution. WSO2 has the community version for free, so many of the smaller companies can use it. I'm not sure what the prices are for support, though, so I suppose the support for WSO2 is not cheap either."
"TIBCO BusinessWorks is a very expensive solution."
"The product is not cheap."
"It is a bit expensive for medium-sized companies. If you are migrating from the current version to the container-supported version, it is quite expensive. The existing licensing will not work because the product platform itself is different."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
27%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...
What do you like most about TIBCO BusinessWorks?
The ability to link to different technologies is valuable to us.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TIBCO BusinessWorks?
TIBCO BusinessWorks is a very expensive solution. Four years ago, we purchased four products with a two-course for 20 million dollars. This is a perpetual license.
 

Also Known As

Information Builders Parallel Service Manager, Parallel Service Manager
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Butler Health System
Euler Hermes, QSuper, Scandinavian Airlines
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Salesforce, Red Hat and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). Updated: November 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.