IBM Cloud Databases for Redis vs Redis comparison

IBM and RedisLabs are both solutions in the In-Memory Data Store Services category. IBM is ranked #10, while RedisLabs is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.8. IBM holds a 0.5% mindshare in IMDS, compared to RedisLabs’s 10.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of RedisLabs users are willing to recommend the solution.

IBM Cloud Databases for Redis

138 Views
51 Comparison Views

Redis

Read 19 Redis reviews

1,366 Views
1,214 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Cloud Databases for Redis

Redis

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Databases for Redis and Redis based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RedisLabs, Google, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in In-Memory Data Store Services.

Categories and Ranking

IBM Cloud Databases for Redis

Ranking in In-Memory Data Store Services

10th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Redis

Ranking in In-Memory Data Store Services

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

NoSQL Databases (8th), Vector Databases (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the In-Memory Data Store Services category, the mindshare of IBM Cloud Databases for Redis is 0.5%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Redis is 10.6%, down from 15.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

In-Memory Data Store Services

Featured Reviews

Use IBM Cloud Databases for Redis?

Share your opinion

Chethan Rao S

Software Engineer at Medflix

Performs much better than traditional databases, integrates well and lot of learning resources available

It improved the performance. For example, data structures like hashmaps in Redis make it a very fast database – much faster than traditional SQL databases. It can perform at significantly higher speeds. Latencies are very low. Our primary focus wasn't on saving money but on improving performance for that specific feature. So, performance has been the key improvement. Every calculation happened in real time. It improved the performance 10X. In our company, we have limited resources, so we can't manage the database ourselves. We use services from Azure for that. So, Redis integrates well with those services. We use Azure Cache for Redis.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which In-Memory Data Store Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

16%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Redis?

Redis is better tested and is used by large companies. I haven't found a direct alternative to what Redis offers. Plus, there are a lot of support and learning resources available, which help you u...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Redis?

Redis could improve its efficiency in handling locally stored data, not just Amazon Cloud or Google Cloud. It would be helpful if Redis could provide a one-stop solution for all data varieties, whi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Redis?

I used Redis for a one-time implementation while working on a college project. I implemented it locally on a machine and used it for a vector search.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Amazon SQS vs Redis

Compared 16% of the time

Chroma vs Redis

Compared 13% of the time

OpenSearch vs Redis

Compared 7% of the time

Faiss vs Redis

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Coherence vs Redis

Compared 7% of the time

More Redis Competitors

Product Reports

No data available

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Coherence vs. Redis

October 2024

Download Redis product report

Also Known As

No data available

Redis Enterprise

Learn More

IBM

RedisLabs

Overview

Databases for Redis gives two Redis instances—a master and a replica member—with Redis sentinels monitoring both. Accessing the database is managed through a single Kubernetes Nodeport, behind which one or more HAProxy instances handle all the traffic. It’s the HAProxy instances that manage to which we’ve added support for TLS/SSL encryption for incoming connections to the Redis server—something Redis doesn’t do out-of-the-box currently.

Redis is a high-performance, scalable, and easy-to-use caching solution that improves application performance. It is also used for session management, real-time analytics, and as a message broker.

Redis's valuable features include its ability to handle large amounts of data quickly, its simplicity and straightforward setup process, and its support for various data structures, providing flexibility for different use cases.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

1. Twitter 2. GitHub 3. StackOverflow 4. Pinterest 5. Snapchat 6. Craigslist 7. Digg 8. Weibo 9. Airbnb 10. Uber 11. Slack 12. Trello 13. Shopify 14. Coursera 15. Medium 16. Twitch 17. Foursquare 18. Meetup 19. Kickstarter 20. Docker 21. Heroku 22. Bitbucket 23. Groupon 24. Flipboard 25. SoundCloud 26. BuzzFeed 27. Disqus 28. The New York Times 29. Walmart 30. Nike 31. Sony 32. Philips

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Coherence vs. Redis

October 2024

Free Report: Oracle Coherence vs. Redis

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Coherence vs. Redis and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best In-Memory Data Store Services vendors.

We monitor all In-Memory Data Store Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.