Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Cloud Video vs UberConference comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Cloud Video
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
40th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
CDN (31st)
UberConference
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
48th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of IBM Cloud Video is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UberConference is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

RL
Great user interface and easy to implement
I like the corporate looking user interface for the audience and very straight forward log-in process too. The user interface of other solutions such as GoToWebinar can be confusing for a less tech-savvy audience. IBM has thoroughly thought through everything and the flexibility to integrate the API to expand the registration gateway allows us to have an extra layer of security. Furthermore, the brand IBM is reputable in the market for its data and network security.
Use UberConference?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

IBM Ustream
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Airbnb, N3 Results, University of Notre Dame
DOMO, Netflix, fitbit, The New York Times
Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: April 2025.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.