Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog vs IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM InfoSphere Information ...
Ranking in Metadata Management
5th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog
Ranking in Metadata Management
10th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Metadata Management category, the mindshare of IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is 9.3%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog is 7.7%, down from 9.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Metadata Management
 

Featured Reviews

Giuseppe Innamorato - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 11, 2022
Reasonably priced, easy to install, and reliable
We recently suggested FlexiCapture and the ABBYY platform to a customer in Italy, but we are now waiting for their response. Unfortunately, we have no direct experience with the platform. We are a consulting service and a consulting company that also works on system integration. We use a variety of platforms ranging from IBM to Microsoft. We are specifically focused on data management and artificial intelligence solution. We use many different solutions, such as InfoSphere, and Db2 for databases for example. We have many projects also on Information Governance where we use not only IBM products but also Informatica products, for example, in the MDM arena. We work with both IBM InfoSphere Information Server and Governance Catalog.
Use IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing for IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is per user."
"In terms of pricing, I find IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog excessive. It's at the top end of the price range in terms of what you get for your money. It's an expensive product, and contractually, IBM is difficult to deal with. I can't remember the exact cost of IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog, but it could be in the region of three hundred thousand pounds."
"IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is expensive."
"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Metadata Management solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
32%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
24%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Insurance Company
8%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog?
The ability to create special rules inside the solution using Portuguese is the most valuable feature.
What needs improvement with IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog?
The scalability has room for improvement. I would like the ability to run the solution from different servers. The price has room for improvement.
What is your primary use case for IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog?
IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is used to integrate and govern our information.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

IBM Information Governance Catalog
IBM Data Catalog
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rabobank, QuadReal Property Group, Jakarta Smart City
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Alation, SAP and others in Metadata Management. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.