Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM InfoSphere Optim vs Informatica Data Archive comparison

IBM and Informatica are both solutions in the Database Development and Management category. IBM is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.0, while Informatica is ranked #22. IBM holds a 2.5% mindshare in DDM, compared to Informatica’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Informatica users who would recommend it.
IBM InfoSphere Optim
Read 3 IBM InfoSphere Optim reviews
  • 647 Views
  • 252 Comparison Views
66% willing to recommend
Informatica Data Archive
Read 2 Informatica Data Archive reviews
  • 248 Views
  • 145 Comparison Views
66% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

Informatica Data Archive and IBM InfoSphere Optim compete in data archiving and management. Informatica holds an advantage in pricing and support, while IBM excels in advanced features for comprehensive data management.

Features: Informatica Data Archive offers efficient data archiving, adherence to compliance, and storage optimization. IBM InfoSphere Optim provides application data management, testing efficiency, and robust lifecycle management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM InfoSphere Optim offers a versatile deployment model for complex IT environments and comprehensive customer service. Informatica Data Archive features a straightforward deployment process with reliable customer support, better suited for less complex setups.

Pricing and ROI: Informatica Data Archive presents competitive setup costs with better immediate ROI due to affordable pricing. IBM InfoSphere Optim requires a higher initial investment but offers long-term benefits and enhanced ROI through extensive capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Informatica Data Archive Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Informatica Data Archive
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM InfoSphere Optim
Ranking in Database Development and Management
16th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Informatica Data Archive
Ranking in Database Development and Management
22nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Database Development and Management category, the mindshare of IBM InfoSphere Optim is 2.5%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Informatica Data Archive is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Database Development and Management
 

Featured Reviews

Ajai Lal - PeerSpot reviewer
Very supportive of Db2 and easy to customize, but IMS features are not user friendly and the support of these features is lacking
We work on two different types of databases, one being IMS and the other Db2. While the solution is very supportive of Db2, it is not so friendly when it comes to IMS databases. When we had questions for the support team conerning the IMS database, we found their knowledge to be lacking, likely owing to lack of experience on their part. I would not say that the initial setup is complex. Neither would I say that it is straightforward. Certain features require technical knowledge.
Read full review
SB
Easy to understand layer flows, reliable, and excellent support
We are using Informatica Data Archive for clients' legacy systems to confirm the data from their legacy system to the new system based on the SQL Server The most valuable features of Informatica Data Archive are ease of use, and the flows from one layer to the next are simple to understand. The…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I feel the solution to be a bit faster than the traditional methods, which makes it easy to customize."
"We like that we can easily restore the database with just a few clicks. The database is linked as well."
"One of the most valuable features of Informatica Data Archive is its performance."
"The most valuable features of Informatica Data Archive are ease of use, and the flows from one layer to the next are simple to understand."
 

Cons

"While the solution is very supportive of Db2, it is not so friendly when it comes to IMS databases."
"We're looking for a solution that can be implemented on AWS. IBM InfoSphere Optim can be implemented on AWS, but it costs more than double what we're currently paying. So, it's not really of good value for us."
"The recovery features could improve in Informatica Data Archive."
"Informatica Data Archive could improve by providing training. Training is one area where we lack, there are not very many trained resources in the market for sales, GPM, proposals, new offerings, or new features that are being added to this solution. It would be really helpful for consultants, like me, to understand the new, cool features these solutions are constantly adding. Training is something, that should be in place."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IBM InfoSphere Optim is a very expensive solution. Actually, it's the most expensive archiving solution that we have."
"The price of Informatica Data Archive is reasonable. Different versions of the solution are available, such as the professional edition and enterprise edition."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
30%
Healthcare Company
9%
Insurance Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

Solix Enterprise Data Management vs IBM InfoSphere Optim Logo
Solix Enterprise Data Management vs IBM InfoSphere Optim
Compared 50% of the time
More IBM InfoSphere Optim Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Database Development and Management
January 2025
IBM InfoSphere Optim reportDownload IBM InfoSphere Optim product report
Buyer's Guide
Database Development and Management
January 2025
Informatica Data Archive reportDownload Informatica Data Archive product report
 

Also Known As

IBM Optim, Optim
Data Archive
 

Overview

IBM Optim solutions manage data from requirements to retirement. They boost performance, empower collaboration, and improve governance across applications, databases and platforms. By managing data properly over its lifetime, organisations are better equipped to support business goals with less risk.
IBM

Retire legacy applications, manage data growth, improve application performance, and maintain compliance with structured archiving.

Informatica
 

Sample Customers

Durham Police Department, Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc., Continental, KCE Electronics Public Company Limited, The University of Adelaide, Migros Zurich, COPROB
Clopay
Buyer's Guide
IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Informatica Data Archive
January 2025
Free Report: IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Informatica Data Archive
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Informatica Data Archive and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Informatica Data Archive report.
See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.

We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.