Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM) vs Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Customer service is good, but technical support faces delays, prioritization issues, and limitations in log file interpretation assistance.
Sentiment score
3.9
Informatica Test Data Management's customer service is praised for excellence, though some users report global support challenges.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.8
IBM InfoSphere Optim TDM has limitations in data generation, complexity, user interface, inefficiencies, licensing, and installation, requiring enhancements.
Sentiment score
4.2
Informatica Test Data Management must improve data masking, transformations, UI, compatibility, integration, and address user experience and performance issues.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Some users faced scalability issues with IBM InfoSphere Optim TDM, but most found it scalable across multiple platforms without extra hardware.
Sentiment score
5.8
Informatica TDM is scalable, supporting both horizontal and vertical expansion, efficiently handling large databases with minimal tuning required.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
IBM InfoSphere Optim TDM costs depend on CPU/MIPS, with higher costs and enterprise licenses, offering annual and monthly payment options.
Sentiment score
4.4
Users recommend subscription or short-term rental for Informatica TDM due to project suitability and high upfront licensing costs.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
9.5
IBM InfoSphere Optim TDM is stable, with positive user ratings, though maintenance can be complex in certain environments.
Sentiment score
7.0
Informatica Test Data Management is generally stable and reliable, though some users experience occasional instability and minor issues.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.8
IBM InfoSphere Optim TDM is praised for its data masking, flexibility, user-friendliness, and effective non-production environment management.
Sentiment score
7.5
Informatica TDM excels with data masking, dynamic features, strong engines, and effective data discovery through RegEx and automated workflows.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM InfoSphere Optim Test D...
Ranking in Test Data Management
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Informatica Test Data Manag...
Ranking in Test Data Management
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Test Data Management category, the mindshare of IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM) is 9.7%, down from 14.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) is 17.8%, up from 15.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Data Management
 

Featured Reviews

Ajai Lal - PeerSpot reviewer
Supports both legacy and non-legacy systems
The solution's initial setup is neither complex nor too easy. Around six or seven people, including database administrators, were involved in the solution's deployment. On a scale from one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy, I rate the solution's initial setup a four to five out of ten.
Mukul Shukla - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient test data management with good automation and speeds up processes
I face multiple issues, but these are not due to a lack of functionality in the product but rather its inherent complexity. There is a lag while opening the console, which is a concern from my end. Additionally, the logs are not always clear, and sometimes, accessing the PowerCenter server becomes necessary to identify errors.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Data Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Insurance Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
24%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM)?
The platform's ability to generate metrics is the most valuable feature for data management. It is a user-friendly and easy-to-use tool.
What needs improvement with IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM)?
TDM's efficiency in terms of generating reports needs improvement. It could work faster.
What do you like most about Informatica Test Data Management (TDM)?
The tool enabled us to leverage Teradata Parallel Transporter to write the masked data efficiently to our Teradata warehouse.
What needs improvement with Informatica Test Data Management (TDM)?
I face multiple issues, but these are not due to a lack of functionality in the product but rather its inherent complexity. There is a lag while opening the console, which is a concern from my end....
What is your primary use case for Informatica Test Data Management (TDM)?
I am an administrator for the Informatica Test Data Management solution. My team uses it to generate test data, create dummy data, replicate production data by masking it, and use it within the QA ...
 

Also Known As

IBM Optim Test Data Management, Optim Test Data Management, IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management
Informatica TDM
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Dignity Health
Vale, Hot Telecommunication
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM) vs. Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.